Job-Seekers Want a Retirement Plan

Most Americans look for a retirement plan when considering a job offer, yet only 50% of employers offer one.

Nearly 80% of employees view benefits such as a retirement plan as being key considerations when accepting a new position, the ADP Research Institute found. However, only 50% of companies provide a retirement option. While some employers are concerned about cost and disinterest among management and employees alike, the size of the company itself may be another reason it does not offer a retirement savings vehicle, according to ADP.

“Employers with less than 50 employees need to balance the benefits of plan sponsorships with [their] costs, time commitments and fiduciary responsibilities,” ADP says in its report, “Retirement Savings Trends: How Employers Can Extend Coverage and Simplify the Retirement Readiness Process.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

In terms of industry, the percentage of employers that provide retirement benefits varies widely. Manufacturing leads the field with 67.1% of manufacturers offering retirement benefits, which could be due to “the prevalence of unions in this sector, where certain benefit offerings may be contractually mandated,” ADP says. “On the other hand, in the leisure and hospitality sector, only 23.3% of the companies offer retirement benefits, consistent in an industry with a high percentage of temporary, part-time and seasonal workers.”

After manufacturing, the top five industries for providing retirement benefits are information (63.0%); professional and business services (55.9%); financial activities (52.4%); education and health services (51.5%); and transportation and utilities (49.7%).

Similarly, there is a disparity between smaller and larger companies, which “could be attributed to cost, administrative complexity and the fiduciary responsibilities that accompany offering a retirement plan,” ADP says. “Small employers also lack the bargaining power of larger firms because they generally have less assets invested in their plans.”

Employers with 5,000 or more workers were most likely to provide retirement benefits (98.4%), followed by those with 1,000 to 4,999 employees (96.0%). For companies with fewer than 1,000 employees, the percentage offering retirement benefits steadily declines according to their size. Nine in 10 (93.3%) of those with 500 to 999 workers offer these benefits, as do 85.3% with 50 to 499 workers, 60.3% with 20 to 49 workers, and just 33.0% with one to 19 workers.

The data represents 10 million employees at 161,000 companies, all between the ages of 20 and 69 and earning at least $20,000 annually.

(b)lines Ask the Experts – Do We Have to Hire an Outside Adviser?

“I work at a Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) 403(b) plan sponsor. We currently do NOT engage an investment adviser for the plan. Instead, we review the investments on our own.

“Does ERISA require us to engage an outside adviser? Or is it a recommendation as a best practice?” 

Michael A. Webb, vice president, Cammack Retirement Group, answers:

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Excellent question! ERISA does not mandate the use of the investment adviser, and indeed, there is not a tremendous amount of guidance about the subject.

However, the Department of Labor (DOL) does state the following in its publication Meeting Your Fiduciary Responsibilities:

“The duty to act prudently is one of a fiduciary’s central responsibilities under ERISA. It requires expertise in a variety of areas, such as investments. Lacking that expertise, a fiduciary will want to hire someone with that professional knowledge to carry out the investment and other functions. Prudence focuses on the process for making fiduciary decisions. Therefore, it is wise to document decisions and the basis for those decisions. For instance, in hiring any plan service provider, a fiduciary may want to survey a number of potential providers, asking for the same information and providing the same requirements. By doing so, a fiduciary can document the process and make a meaningful comparison and selection.”

Thus, according to this guidance, an adviser selected in a diligent and well-documented process can be of benefit to the many plans that lack in-house expertise on retirement plan investing and/or other fiduciary practice areas.

Thank you for your question!

 

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.

«