Millennials Lack Confidence in Social Security’s Future

Despite their pessimism, Social Security remains a portion of Millennial’s plans for living in retirement.

The majority of young Americans lacks confidence in the future of Social Security, according to the most recent GenForward study from the University of Chicago. The survey found this sentiment to be strongest among African Americans and Latinos.

The study report notes, “While there are debates among experts about the financial stability of Social Security, it appears that most young adults are pessimistic that the system as currently constructed will exist into the future.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Despite their pessimism, Social Security remains a portion of Millennial’s plans for living in retirement. Fifty-seven percent of Asian Americans reported they plan to rely on Social Security when they retire. That figure is 48% for African Americans, 53% for Latinos and 46% for whites.  

Asked what type of retirement savings or pension they have, the most common response in each racial and ethnic group is that Millennials have no retirement savings or pensions. Whites and Asian Americans are most likely to have a 401(k) or other defined contribution (DC) plan through an employer, and most likely to also have retirement savings outside a retirement account (though African Americans are most likely to have a defined pension through an employer).                           

The majority of Millennials in each ethnic group lack confidence they will be able to retire when they want to (61% of Latinos, 60% of African Americans, 54% of Asian Americans and 52% of Whites).

A significant amount of optimism was reported when it came to whether Millennials will be better off financially than their parents. When asked, “In terms of household finances, do you think you will eventually do better or worse than your parents have done?” 76% of Latinos agreed, as did 62% of African Americans, 65% of Asian Americans (65%) and 47% of Whites.

However, the study report concludes that “many whites feel that they are experiencing economic stagnation or decline, while African American, Latino and Asian American Millennials perceive that their economic standing is likely to improve on that of their parents.”

“A Report on the Lived Economics of Millennials,” can be found at GenforwardSurvey.com

Cost Considerations When Freezing Your DB Plan

Just because a plan is frozen, doesn’t mean fees will go away altogether.

If you purchased a large home when raising a family, would you continue to pay for it once the kids have grown and moved away? For many, it may be worth downsizing to fit a new set of needs and goals. 

That’s the analogy Monica Gallagher, a partner at October Three Consulting, utilizes to describe the work of administering a frozen defined benefit (DB) plan. Just because a plan is frozen doesn’t mean fees will go away altogether, so a reassessment of needs and services is always in order once a DB plan is frozen. 

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

According to Gallagher, along with Stu Lawrence, national retirement practice leader from Segal, expenses concerning administration of the plan; actuary and accountant tasks; and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) premiums are all still responsibilities sponsors must face when freezing their plans. While most employers outsource plan administration, says Gallagher, others team with providers to tame plan data and answer phone calls concerning benefit accruals. Additional services involve employing actuaries and accountants to evaluate liabilities of pension plans, calculate contributions and audit the plan.

Lawrence notes that while auditing a plan may grow slightly easier as a frozen plan decreases in number of participants, costs—for the most part—will remain the same. “The costs haven’t changed. It might be easier to do an audit of those plans, and the fees from the actuarial calculation might go down, but the accountant and actuary will still charge their basic fee,” he says.

Those that entirely terminate their plan—which can only occur if an employer pays out the value to the worker in a single sum, or finds an insurance company to stand in the shoes of the plan via a pension buyout—face no concerns over PBGC fees, as once a plan is terminated, the fees are dropped.

“Once you terminate a plan, and you in effect settle the liabilities, you no longer have to pay PBGC,” says Gallagher. 

According to Lawrence, DB plans can be in one of four stages—ongoing, closed, frozen and terminated. A terminated plan requires that an employer settles the plan obligation with the worker; ongoing plans have participants who are still accumulating benefits as service continues; closed plans, also known as soft-frozen plans, block new participants from entering, yet allow existing employees to resume benefit accrual; and frozen plans strictly disallow all participants from accruing benefits.

“For most, you start with an ongoing plan, you may become a closed plan, a frozen plan, and at some point, you’re going to be a terminated plan,” says Lawrence.

NEXT: A path for DB plan stages

The experts warn that it is generally not suitable for a closed plan to remain in that state indefinitely. 

As Lawrence describes, when existing plan participants age in a closed plan, pay raises and higher salaries are given; therefore in ten years’ time, when the only workers in the plan are those with a decade of service or more, the plan “transitions from a closed one to a discriminatory one,” because it only favors the higher paid. This, in turn, forces the plan to freeze, unless the plan sponsor finds another way to address discrimination testing challenges. 

“Closed plans can be a temporary state, but at some point, just by the passage of time, it’ll become a discriminatory plan, and then it has to become a frozen plan,” Lawrence explains. However, lawmakers are working to amend nondiscrimination rules for closed or frozen plans.

Rather than allow a closed plan to eventually shift to frozen, Lawrence advises employers to lay out a journey for the plan, and then stick to following it. “A lot of employers overlook the journey to get to the destination,” he says.

As a first step, Lawrence recommends increasing risk mitigation, through gauging the plan’s risk profile, and then conferring with a consultant on how to decrease uncompensated risk.

“If you don’t have the big picture of not only the destination, but of the steps and the journey, if you don’t have that and you live each day at a time, it might actually work against the employer in the future,” he says.

Automated technology—combined with self-service support—can help reduce expensive costs previously accepted for active pension plans. Once a plan is frozen, Gallagher suggests employers calculate and certify all plan benefits immediately.  

As a final move, employers may consider switching vendors—an action considered traditionally expensive with active plans. But, for a plan that is frozen, there are minimal expenses to consider, Gallagher says.

«