PBGC Issues Proposed Rule for Multiemployer Plan Mergers

The proposed rule would provide guidance about the process for requesting a facilitated merger, including a request for financial assistance.

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) is proposing a rule to facilitate mergers of multiemployer pension plans.

The proposed rule will be published in the Federal Register Monday, June 6. It implements changes under the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 (MPRA).                

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Section 121 of MPRA amends the existing rules under section 4231 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by adding a new section 4231(e), which clarifies PBGC’s authority to facilitate the merger of two or more multiemployer plans if certain statutory requirements are met. For purposes of section 4231(e), “facilitation” may include training, technical assistance, mediation, communication with stakeholders, and support with related requests to other government agencies.  In addition, subject to the requirements of section 4231(e)(2), PBGC may provide financial assistance (within the meaning of section 4261 of ERISA) to facilitate a merger it determines is necessary to enable one or more of the plans involved to avoid or postpone insolvency. 

The proposed rule would provide guidance about the process for requesting a facilitated merger under section 4231(e) of ERISA, including a request for financial assistance under section 4231(e)(2). The proposed rule would also reorganize and update the existing regulation.

“Plan mergers can make multiemployer pensions more stable and secure,” says PBGC Director Tom Reeder. “PBGC can help save troubled multiemployer plans before they fail. That helps plan participants and reduces the long-term costs of the pension insurance program.” Mergers can stabilize or increase the base of contributing employers, combine plan assets for more efficient investing, and reduce plan administrative costs.

The agency said its ability to provide financial assistance is constrained by its limited financial resources. PBGC will need additional resources to help all the plans that need assistance. Before assisting a merger, PBGC must determine that the merger is necessary to avoid plan insolvency, the assistance will reduce the agency’s expected long-term loss, and the assistance will not harm its ability to meet existing obligations.

Last year, the agency issued an interim final rule about allowing multiemployer plan partitions to help them avoid insolvency.

Text of the proposed rule for mergers, along with instructions for submitting comments, is here.

Willis Towers Watson Offers Illiquidity Risk Premium Index

“The index helps plan sponsors determine where and when it is good to take liquidity risk,” says Thierry Adant, with Willis Towers Watson.

Willis Towers Watson introduced its Illiquidity Risk Premium (IRP) Index.

In a research paper, “Understanding and Measuring the Illiquidity Risk Premium,” the company observes that investors generally do not have a good understanding of what they’re being paid for having their capital locked up. By referencing the principle “what gets measured gets managed,” the company explores what investors should demand for accepting illiquidity risk and how this can be measured by using a new IRP index.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

According to Willis Towers Watson, the index enables comparison of IRPs across assets on a consistent basis, so as to make relative-value statements about the attractiveness of taking illiquidity risk across those assets.

Thierry Adant, a consultant for credit research at Willis Towers Watson in New York City, tells PLANSPONSOR, “We think liquidity listing is underutilized. Having a good understanding of whether [defined benefit plan sponsors] are getting paid enough is better than blind allocations. The index helps plan sponsors determine where and when it is good to take liquidity risk.”

According to Adant, the IRP Index is a proprietary offering Willis Towers Watson has been using for a number of years, but is now introducing it to investors because of a change in the market liquidity regime, not just for bonds but other assets. “If [liquidity] is managed correctly, it can make a big difference over time,” he says.

The company warns that its IRP index currently indicates that IRPs are at the low end of fair value and are likely to remain so for some time unless there is a significant downside event, which would push all risk premium—including IRPs—higher.

«