Participants Do Not Factor Tax Rates Into Retirement Savings Decisions

Researchers found that although education increased participants’ use of expected tax-rate changes in their plan choices, participants continued to display an economically “irrational” preference for pre-tax deferrals over Roth deferrals.

Researchers for the Center for Retirement Research (CRR) at Boston College examined individual choices between Roth and pre-tax deferrals to retirement plans.

The results of their experiments suggest that individuals may not systematically rely on their beliefs regarding their relative tax rates when making plan choices, but that at least part of that failure is due to a lack of awareness and/or understanding. However, the researchers say, although education increased participants’ use of expected tax-rate changes in their plan choices, participants continued to display an economically “irrational” preference for pre-tax deferrals. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The researchers found this to be systematically related to participants’ more general non-economic attitudes and preferences and the relation of these attitudes and preferences to the features of the plans being evaluated. However, they did find that investment risk preference is negatively associated with a preference for pre-tax deferrals and may be influenced by tax-related contextual variables as well.

“Consistent with prior research, our results suggest that individuals, on average, do not respond rationally to the relative economic incentives associated with alternatively structured plans. Further, although errors can be reduced with increased awareness, our evidence illustrates that individuals systematically incorporate non-economic factors into their retirement plan choices, often leading to a preference for [pre-tax deferrals] even when such a choice is economically adverse,” the researchers say in their report.

Even when participants were educated about how their tax rates before and after retirement related to their retirement income, 49% who reported that they expected their tax rates to be lower in retirement nonetheless elected to make their contributions to on a pre-tax basis. Conversely, only 18% of those who reported that they expected their tax rates to be higher in retirement nonetheless selected to make their immediate contributions as a Roth deferral.

The research found that participants, on average, prefer to pre-pay for consumption and positively discount future payments. As the researchers expected, they link the tax costs and savings of Roth deferrals more than they do pre-tax deferrals and see the tax costs and savings of Roth deferrals as more uncertain than those of a pre-tax deferrals.

One other finding of the research is that a sense of urgency regarding saving for retirement is positively associated with savings rates. “While this is not surprising in itself, the current crisis in retirement preparedness suggests that current marketing and education campaigns are not sufficiently stoking investors’ sense of urgency,” the researchers said. “Further research into the factors that increase a sense of urgency for retirement saving could be fruitful for future campaigns aimed at increasing savings rates.”

The research report can be downloaded from here.

Americans Worry Inflation Will Derail Their Retirement

Nearly one-third are "panicked" or "very worried" about inflation's negative effects.

Nearly one-third, 32%, of Americans are “panicked” or “very worried” about inflation, Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America found in a survey. However, 64% do not have a plan to address the rising cost of living in retirement. Among the 36% who do, 51% said their plan is simply to be more frugal with money.

Fifty-four percent of Americans said they are “terrified” or “very concerned” that inflation will impede their ability to pay for health care. The same concerns were expressed about paying for long-term care (45%), living the lifestyle they would like to have in retirement (40%), being able to pay for housing (33%), paying for groceries (29%) and being able to afford to travel (27%).

Americans expect inflation to increase by an average of 4.4% a year. However, 31% thought it could increase between 5% and 10% a year, and 8% said it would be more than 10% a year. The fact is, Allianz Life says, the average inflation rate over the past 20 years in the U.S. has been 2.15%.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

“Although it may be an option for managing expenses, frugality is not a financial strategy that will mindfully and effectively address the rising cost of living throughout retirement, especially one that could last 30 years or more,” says Deb Repya, Allianz Life vice president of consumer insights. “There are many factors to consider when planning a long, comfortable retirement, and addressing inflation is a critical piece of that puzzle.”

Ipsos conducted the survey for Allianz Life among 1,213 adults in July.

 

«

 

You’re viewing the first of three free articles.

 Subscribe to a free PW Newsletter! 

…subscribing gets you free access to PW’s online content!

If you’re a subscriber, please login.