All Generations Struggling to Meet Retirement Goals

A survey reveals motivations to get retirement plan participants to save more.

Millennials, more so than other generations, grasp the importance of retirement savings, a survey by Natixis Global Asset Management found.

Sixty-nine percent of Millennials, compared to 55% of Baby Boomers, think workers should be required to save for retirement. Eighty-two percent of Millennials, versus 77% of Generation X, think employers should be required to offer retirement plans. Seventy-six percent of Millennials, compared to 66% of Boomers, think companies should offer matching funds, and 84% of Millennials want investment options that reflect their personal values.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Millennials began saving for retirement, on average, at age 23, while Gen Xers didn’t start until age 27 and Boomers at 31. While 81% of Boomers are counting on Social Security, only 55% of Millennials think it will still be in existence by the time they retire.

Sixty percent of the 951 workers that Natixis surveyed said they have figured out how much they will need in retirement. Boomers think they will need an average of $934,677 and are 34% on the way there ($317,790). Gen Xers say they will need $810,387 and have 24% of their target saved ($194,492), and Millennials have a target of $869,662 but have only 8% of this saved ($69,573).

Forty-one percent of workers save less than 5% of their salaries, and 28% have taken out a withdrawal from their retirement savings. Among Millennials, withdrawals jump to 43%.

“Younger workers in particular are grappling with a different set of retirement challenges, compared to previous generations,” says Ed Farrington, executive vice president for retirement strategies at Natixis. “Their retirement savings strategies are encumbered by a number of factors such as student loan debt, a lack of company pensions and a sense of doubt that Social Security will be a source of income in retirement. Employers would do well to focus on designing comprehensive plans that offer greater incentives and a better range of investment choice that especially appeal to this large portion of the workforce.”

NEXT: How many aren’t participating?
The survey found that 31% are not participating in their employer’s retirement plan. The No. 1 reason they give as to why is that their employer is not offering enough of a match, or no match at all (48%). Thirty-five percent said it is due to rising health care costs, and 20% said it is because they are saving for their child’s education. Thirty-three percent of Millennials said student loan debt is an impediment.

Among the 69% who are participating in their retirement plan, 63% say it is because of the company match, 56% cite the tax incentives, and 52% point to the automatic deductions from their paycheck. Sixty-nine percent say they would contribute more if their employer boosted their match.

Workers who have received financial advice have, on average, 10% more saved than those who did not. Seventeen percent said they would save more if they had access to financial advice. However, only 30% of the workers surveyed said their employer offers financial advice.

Eighty-seven percent said they would save more if they were permitted to participate in their company’s retirement plan from the first day they started working there. Twenty-three percent said they would be incentivized to save more if their plan automatically escalated their contributions.

Forty-five percent said they did not know how much they will need for retirement. Natixis says that financial education is obviously needed, as only 55% correctly answered a question about compounding interest.

CoreData conducted the survey for Natixis in August and September.

SURVEY SAYS: Additional Time Needed in a Day

There’s often not enough time in the day to get everything we want or need to get done, or to get enough sleep.

Last week, I asked NewsDash readers, “How many hours would you add to the 24-hour day to get everything you want or need to get done, and how would you spend those hours?”

Slightly more than 18% of responding readers said they needed 6 hours, while 16.4% said they needed none. Three hours was chosen by 16.4% of respondents; 14.5% selected 2; and 12.7% chose 4. Nine percent said they needed 5 extra hours, 7.3% need more than 6 and 5.4% just need 1.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Sleep was the activity for spending that extra time chosen by the majority (63.5%) of respondents, followed by spending time with family (36.5%) and reading and household chores (both tied at 30.8%). One-quarter of readers said they would spend that extra time on their hobby, and 21.1% each said they would spend time with friends and spend time volunteering or on special projects. More than one in ten readers (11.5%) said they would spend the extra time catching up on TV shows and movies, and 5.8% would work.

One-quarter of responding readers chose “other.” Many of those respondents said the extra hours would be just “me time.” Other responses included exercising, playing games, crafting and spending time with pets.

Among readers who left comments, quite a few said it is not an issue of needing more time in the day, but prioritizing what deserves or needs to be spent doing. Other readers suggested adding more time just wouldn’t work because others would just demand more, or as one reader said, “It is just like a raise, the more you have the more you spend, so I don’t think extra hours would work!” I have to give a shout out to the reader who said: “Tell my boss I need more time to read PLANSPONSOR and all the useful news!” Editor’s Choice goes to the reader who said: “Gee, if I didn’t have to work, the length of the day would be just perfect.” 

Thanks to all who participated in the survey!

Verbatim 

I would probably add 6 hours. 2 for sleeping and 4 for hobbies and interests I don't get to explore, in part because there's not enough time in a day.

Time management has always been a personal challenge. All the electronic distractions don't help things.

I hope I wouldn't spend any more of this time working!!! Or commuting!

I would not add hours to the day. I would propose the calendar be changed to add a whole new day to give us an 8 day week. That would be a 3 day weekend every week?! The extra day would be a weekend day so that during the work week I would not have to worry about catching up on home activities and would still work the long hours without feeling as guilty.

I wouldn't add time for anything but sleep. I always seem to find the time to work, do chores, etc. it is sleep that loses out. If I had more time I'd only use it for sleep.

I'm fairly organized, so just one hour to devote to doing things that I would like to do, but just don't have enough time to do.

By the time I get home from work, exercise, cook dinner, and do the dishes I'm pooped! If I try to read, my eyes are closed within 2 minutes! I'd add more hours for sleeping so I can read.

This is, of course, a silly question because we are not adding more hours to a 24-hour day. But your list in question 2 could help people prioritize what's important enough to them to fit within the astronomically determined period we call a day.

If only I had the extra hours I would use it to sleep, but if everyone had them I would say no thanks. That would just mean that people would find 6 more hours of things for me to do each day and I can't imagine how tired I would be in that scenario.

I need to find another person to delegate to, that should free up some time!

Americans simply work too much, and employers feel entitled to too much of our time.

It is just like a raise, the more you have the more you spend, so I don't think extra hours would work!

I plan to expand my available hours in a day by retiring soon!

I work 10-12 hour days, commute at least 60 minutes most days and get about 5 hours of sleep a night. A little more time to sleep and relax would help immensely and then maybe I wouldn't be so crabby all the time!

The extra hours need to be added to the 6-10 pm hours.

Verbatim (cont.)  

I would like to do more to remove things from my daily life which may be considered unimportant and non-essential.

Are you insane? Adding more hours to the day means your boss just adds more to do.

It's not so much about adding in hours. What's more important is a firm partition between personal relax time and time for everything else.

I keep asking my wife for an 8th day that no one else knows about.

I don't think we necessary need more hours in a day. I just wish I didn't need to sleep 8 hours to be fully productive. I am currently studying for my CPA, so having any additional time to study and be productive vs. sleeping would be awesome.

Not sure it really would make a difference to add hours to the day. It's human nature (in the U.S. anyway) to work too many hours and not spend enough time with family!

Currently working 10+ hour day, leaving no time for volunteering, working out, etc. I keep saying I'll change my priorities, but work then piles up.

We need to slow down and enjoy life more instead of running from one thing to the next. Life is too short.

Tell my boss I need more time to read PLANSPONSOR and all the useful news!

Somehow we need to change expectations regarding just how much we need to get done in a day! Let's give ourselves and each other a break!

I don't need more hours in the day. I need more staff to help do the work!

Gee, if I didn't have to work, the length of the day would be just perfect.

If there were more hours in the day, they would probably be claimed for working. I spend enough time doing that already. If there aren't enough hours in the day, the answer is not to add more hours, but to reduce the things we are committed to. Less not more!

I wish that the extended hours would also include extended daylight.

Presently attempting to rid my life of those activities that have no meaning or purpose, such as useless meetings, Facebook, fluff work, etc. Have a good day.

 

NOTE: Responses reflect the opinions of individual readers and not necessarily the stance of Asset International or its affiliates.

«