DC Participants Get Jumpy on Equity Holdings

October 20, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – After an especially quiet nine-month start for 2014, the first half of October saw a major upswing in 401(k) participant trading activity, according to Aon Hewitt.

Aon Hewitt tracks 401(k) account activities of nearly 1.3 million participants through the Aon Hewitt 401(k) Index. Rob Austin, director of retirement research at Aon Hewitt, tells PLANSPONSOR that the first 13 days of October brought five days of “moderate” or “high” trading activity. To put that in perspective, from January through September 2014, there had been only 12 total “moderate” or “high” trading days among 401(k) plan participants.

“Up until this point 2014 was shaping up to be an incredibly light trading year overall,” Austin says. “Then all of a sudden in the first few weeks of October we saw five days that came in above normal. What was going on? It’s due to the stock market swings, that much is clear.”

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Indeed, the highest trading days for 401(k) participants so far in October have clustered right on and after the days when the S&P 500 lost 1.5% or more. When individuals were making trades, they tended to move from equities and into fixed income, the index shows.

Austin says he is not surprised that the biggest trading days came right after stock market drops, nor that participants favored fixed income on the days when trading volume came in above normal levels.

“We experienced a few daily declines of around 2% so far in October, and clustered right around those days we saw a lot of activity—people were clearly saying, ‘Get me out of here, I don’t want to be in this volatile market,” Austin observes. “For the most part they are selling equity and buying fixed income.”

Strikingly, this participant behavior runs counter to much of the advice being shared by investment professionals and consultants heading in to the end of 2014. Russell Investments, for example, just published its fourth-quarter 2014 global investing outlook, which provides updated strategy and guidance for multi-asset portfolios via Russell’s global team of investment strategists.

While investors are currently experiencing the third-oldest bull market in the past 50 years, Russell’s strategists say we are not likely to face a major turning point in the near future. They maintain the core investment strategy views stated originally in their 2014 Annual Outlook—characterized by a moderate preference for equities over fixed income, a liking for credit, and a bias against exposure to rising long-term interest rates.

Russell researchers admit that volatility has been increasingly recently based on geopolitical events and concerns about slowing global growth, especially in Europe and other non-U.S. markets, but it has not been enough to derail an equity preference for individual investors or institutions. Against this backdrop, Austin says it is clear that some 401(k) participants are letting their emotions get the better of them when it comes to setting and executing long-term investing goals.

He says the Aon Hewitt index shows participants’ growing worries about potential equity losses are resulting in increased and potentially inappropriate allocations to fixed income. For example, looking at October 14, when the S&P 500 went down 1.65%, about 90% of trades executed the following day were to fixed income, Austin says.

“It’s usually the case that when we see something like a 2% drop or more in the equity markets, a vast majority of trades placed the following day are moving from equities over to fixed income,” Austin explains. “We also find that after the stock market goes up a little bit, we see a propensity for people to move more into equities. It’s not nearly at the same volume, but we do see an uptick.”

This means that participants are being reactive to the markets, Austin says.

“Ultimately it’s a harmful behavior—they’re basically selling equity after it’s reduced and buying equity after it’s gone up,” Austin explains. “So that’s really just the old adage of buying high and selling low. That is self-defeating behavior to some extent.”

The phenomenon is as unfortunate as it is dependable, Austin adds.

“We have found consistently over time that, whenever we see a market correction and stocks start to lose some ground, people in 401(k)s tend to be more active and they tend to move towards fixed income,” Austin says. “This is not surprising, but it is something that we are somewhat disappointed to see whenever there is a bit of a pullback from Wall Street.”

PBGC Issues Guidance About Funding Relief Effect on Reporting

October 20, 2014 (PLANPSONSOR.com) – The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) issued guidance about the effect of pension funding relief passed earlier this year on certain reporting requirements.

Technical Update 14-2 provides PBGC guidance about the effect of the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014 (HATFA) on annual financial and actuarial information reporting under section 4010 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and part 4010 of PBGC’s regulations. HATFA extends relief provided in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)—passed in 2012—which allowed defined benefit plans to discount future benefit payments to a present value using a 25-year average of bond rates rather than a two-year average. Plan sponsors may elect to wait until the 2014 plan year to use HATFA rates for funding purposes, in which case the MAP-21 rates will apply for the 2013 plan year. 

In 4010 filings, defined benefit (DB) retirement plans are required to provide, among other things, the following actuarial information for plans other than exempt plans:

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

  • The funding target attainment percentage (FTAP), average funding target attainment percentage (AFTAP), and funding target determined as if the plan has been in at-risk status for funding purposes for five years, which are reported directly on Schedule P; and
  • The actuarial valuation report submitted as an attachment to the 4010 filing.

The filings are due 105 days after the end of the “information year” (e.g., April 15th after year end if the information year is the calendar year). The required actuarial information relates to the plan year ending within the information year.

PBGC Technical Update 12-2 provides guidance about how the MAP-21 stabilization rules affect 4010 reporting. It specifies the calculations where the stabilization rules are to be disregarded (e.g., 80% gateway test) and the calculations where the stabilization rules are to be used (e.g., $15 million funding shortfall waiver, actuarial valuation report data). The rules and concepts set forth in PBGC Technical Update 12-2 continue to apply, PBGC says. 

HATFA’s retroactive application for 2013 may cause a timing issue for some 4010 filers, the agency warns. If a 4010 filing contains actuarial information for 2013 based on segment rates that differ from those the plan ultimately uses, ordinarily the filing would need to be amended, but the PBGC said it appreciates that it would be unduly burdensome to require such amendments. Therefore, 4010 filings need not be amended solely to revise actuarial information that changed because of a decision to use HATFA rates for the 2013 plan year of a plan reported in the filing.

The text of PBGC Technical Update 14-2 is here.

«