Fifty-nine percent of businesses offer wellness
initiatives primarily to invest in or increase worker health and engagement,
while 41% aim to control or reduce health-related costs, according to a survey from the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans (IFEBP).
The survey found that approximately one in four (26%) organizations with wellness initiatives is analyzing the return on
investment (ROI) of its programs. Further, 93% of organizations that analyze and are aware of
their wellness program’s ROI are achieving positive results. On average,
organizations see a return of $3 for every $1 spent. A majority (54%) of organizations
tracking more specific endeavors say wellness efforts have improved engagement,
while another 45% say wellness efforts have reduced absenteeism, and 38% report wellness
efforts have positively affected their organization’s overall bottom line.
Nontraditional wellness initiatives such as discounted wearable
tracking devices, themed dress-up days, game leagues, collaborative work spaces,
and standing/treadmill desks are emerging within the workplace. According to the survey, there is a
growing emphasis on such initiatives, the most popular
including:
Encouraged use of vacation time or time off –
66%;
Mental health coverage – 63%;
Tuition reimbursement – 63%;
Community charity drives – 57%; and
On-site events or celebrations – 50%.
Top traditional wellness initiatives include:
Flu shot program – 71%;
Smoking-cessation program – 54%;
Health risk assessments – 51%;
Health screenings – 50%; and
Wellness competitions or fitness challenges –
42%.
“Employers are taking a greater interest in the social and
mental well-being of their employees,” says Julie Stich, Certified Employee
Benefit Specialist, director of research. “Both traditional and nontraditional
wellness benefits are creating the return on investment employers are looking
for in their workplace wellness programs.”
The Workplace Wellness Trends survey included 479 benefits
and human resources (HR) professionals, financial managers, and other professionals
from the U.S. and Canada. Organizations represented a variety of sizes,
regions, and industries or jurisdictions. The complete survey and more
information are available here.
Major life events—unemployment, divorce, serious health
issues, buying a home—can disrupt long-term saving and investing, and negatively
impact retirement plans, according to TD Ameritrade’s 2015 Financial
Disruptions Survey.
A disruption in a financial plan can have a significant
impact on the amount people are able to put away each month for retirement. TD
Ameritrade calls people who have experienced an event that cuts into saving for
retirement “disrupted Americans.”
The Financial Disruptions Survey explores the impact of
these life events on the average American’s long-term saving habits, reveals a
frightening economic hit and uncovers lessons learned.
There is an opportunity cost to disruptions: Financial
disruptions have cost $2.5 trillion in long-term and retirement savings
for Americans. The most common disruption? A loss of employment or having to
take a lower-paying job.
A majority of disrupted Americans (84%) were saving for
retirement before the disruptive event, with an average of over $500
saved per month. Nearly half of those surveyed (40%) said they felt that having a
steady income meant they were prepared for a life-altering event.
Prior to the disruption, disrupted Americans were most
likely to discuss their financial plans with a spouse or partner.
Most disrupted Americans (79%) had to reduce their saving
and expenditures during the disruption, and, on average, decreased their
retirement saving by almost $300 a month. Half of those surveyed needed to
withdraw money from savings or borrow funds.
Disruptions last nearly five years, resulting in $16,000
less being saved per person than would have been without the disruption.
Decreasing expenditures, using less credit and repaying debt are the most
likely changes made by disrupted Americans to recover financially.
Every human being faces the threat of a financial disruption
because there will always be external factors that can upset the course of a
person’s life, observes Lule Demmissie, managing director of retirement at TD
Ameritrade.
Plan on Disruptions
“The key is to have a financial plan that incorporates risk
management because no one knows when these disruptions can occur,” Demmissie says.
“Saving and planning for our retirement does not guarantee we will be 100%
protected from disruptions, but what it can do is help shelter us from the
unexpected and give us a stronger footing in adjusting after a disruption. In
retirement planning, time can be an asset or a liability.”
On average, disrupted Americans who are back on track with
their long-term retirement goals took almost five years to get there. Yet, half
of them (49%) will need to delay retirement or forego it
completely. With the benefit of hindsight, disrupted Americans said they would
have saved a greater proportion of their income (44%) or started saving or
investing earlier for retirement (36%). Another 26% said they wished they had
been more educated about long-term saving and investing.
Spending
less on luxuries/discretionary items (58%);
Having
employment with an excellent salary (56%); and
Investing
in/maintaining a well-balanced portfolio (51%).
Plan participants need to understand their retirement goals,
regularly evaluate their portfolios and be prepared to make adjustments to the
long-term strategy along the way.
“A retirement plan is adjustable and should evolve over
time, so self-directed investors are in a better position to more easily take a
hands-on approach to their retirement and investing strategies,” Demmissie
says. “While no one can predict when, or if, a financial disruption will occur,
the key is to focus on what can be controlled.”
Other findings of the survey are:
21% of
disrupted Americans do not expect to recover financially from the
consequences of the disruption;
26% of
disrupted Americans check the performance of their investments more
frequently since the event;
19%
say they are more likely to hold investments longer, even if the value
fluctuates; and
18%
discuss their investments with a financial planner or adviser more
frequently.
TD Ameritrade estimated the $2.5 trillion loss by way of the following calculation: On average, a survey respondent experiencing a disruptive event will save almost $300 less per month for a period of almost five years, meaning his savings pot will be $16,000 less than it would have been without the event. Sixty-six percent of survey respondents—158 million disrupted Americans out of a possible 240 million U.S. adults—experienced these sorts of disruptions over the course of their lives, translating to a national loss of $2.5 trillion.
The study surveyed 2,019 American adults nationwide who experienced an event or situation that had a negative effect on their financial plans for retirement or the long term. The survey was conducted online between November 21 and 29, 2014, by Head Solutions Group on behalf of TD Ameritrade.
The 2015 Financial Disruptions Survey can be downloaded here,
and the survey findings can be seen in an infographic at TD Ameritrade’s website.