Compliance October 14, 2015

GASB Proposes Amendment to Include Multiple-Employer Plans

Stakeholders raised concerns regarding the inability of governments whose employees are provided pension benefits through multiple-employer pension plans to obtain information required under GASB Statement No. 68.
Reported by

The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) today proposed new guidance intended to assist governments that participate in certain multiple-employer pension plans to meet the reporting requirements of GASB Statement No. 68, “Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions.”

The proposed guidance would apply to governments that participate in certain private or federally-sponsored, multiple-employer defined benefit pension plans, such as Taft-Hartley plans or plans with similar characteristics. The guidance would establish separate standards for note disclosures of descriptive information about the plan, benefit terms, contribution terms, and required supplementary information presenting required contribution amounts for the past 10 fiscal years. The requirements of the proposal would be effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The GASB said that during the implementation of Statement No. 68, stakeholders raised concerns regarding the inability of governments whose employees are provided pension benefits through such multiple-employer pension plans to obtain required information related to pensions. Specifically, stakeholder concerns focused on the inability of those governments to obtain measurements and other relevant data points needed to comply with the requirements of the Statement.

The GASB’s Exposure Draft, “Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions Provided through Certain Multiple-Employer Defined Benefit Pension Plans,” is here. Comments are due by November 16.

Data and Research October 14, 2015

Using Recordkeeper Proprietary TDFs Not a Given

Plan sponsors and participants stand to gain from advisers shopping around.
Reported by

Retirement plan recordkeepers can no longer count on selling their target-date funds (TDFs) to the plans they serve. A new study finds that almost half of the advisers who sell defined contribution (DC) plans now go shopping for clients’ TDFs, netting them the best fund for the best price—and often from a competitor.

This and other findings appear in Market Strategies International’s Cogent Report, “Retirement Plan Adviser Trends.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“This is the first year we’ve seen plan advisers championing proprietary and non-proprietary options equally, which underscores how competitive the target-date market has become,” says Sonia Sharigian, senior product manager at Market Strategies and the annual report’s co-author.

The likelihood an adviser will suggest an external TDF increases, too, in line with a plan’s assets under management (AUM). Nearly six in 10 (59%) DC specialists managing $50 million or more in defined contribution AUM urge plan sponsors to consider an external asset manager’s fund instead.

The trend to such funds may not be surprising. According to Linda York, vice president, Syndicated Research and Consulting at Cogent Reports, the percentage has been edging up every year. “In 2013, just 32% [of advisers] recommended external target-date fund providers. In 2014, that number was 41%. Now, in 2015, it’s up to 47%,” she notes.

As to why, she posits “a variety of factors.” These include greater scrutiny of plan fees and wider choice of target-date options. Also, “the fact that more plan providers are offering more open architecture in their fund offerings means more advisers have access to external managers,” she says.

NEXT: What lesser competitors stand to lose

Less competitive recordkeeper fund providers could potentially lose a growing amount of market share, as target-date funds now rank as advisers’ second favorite investment option, trailing only traditional, actively managed mutual funds, the paper says. Four in 10 DC advisers (41%) recommend a target-date or lifecycle fund as the plan’s default—twice as many as suggest any other type of qualified default investment alternative (QDIA).

“The move toward external target-date providers, along with [an] increasing popularity of index funds, shows that retirement plan advisers are acknowledging their clients’ concerns of managing plans more responsibly, including seeking the best overall value for the money,” says York. “Among the elite group of DC specialists[—i.e.,  those managing $50 million or more in defined contribution assets—]we find strong preference for both active and passive target-date fund providers, indicating that asset managers will not only need to compete on performance and price, but also find ways to further differentiate their target-date offerings in the marketplace.”

Generally speaking, investment managers can differentiate themselves by adhering to the tried and true: reliability, trustworthiness and consistent performance, showing the adviser they are easy to do business with, the report says.

Other findings include:

  • Nearly three-quarters (73%) of established DC advisers also recommend index funds to their clients, up from 64% in 2014.
  • The percentage of advisers selling defined contribution plans is growing. Two-thirds (65%) of advisers report managing defined contribution assets as part of their overall book of business this year, up from 60% in 2014. “Established DC advisers who manage $10 million or more in DC AUM represent 27% of all advisers, up from 23% a year ago,” York says.
  • Defined contribution advisers work with an average of 4.7 investment managers in their DC plans, down from 5.3 in 2014; however, they concentrate their business with just 2.7 plan recordkeepers—a number that has held steady for several years.

The report is based on a survey, performed in August, of 486 active advisers to defined contribution plans.

Market Strategies International is a market research consultancy that studies consumer/retail, energy, financial services, health care, technology and telecommunications topics.

More information about “Retirement Plan Adviser Trends” can be found here.

«