IRS Extends Closed DB Nondiscrimination Relief

The IRS says proposed permanent amendments to nondiscrimination regulations can be anticipated.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has extended temporary nondiscrimination relief for defined benefit (DB) plans that provide ongoing accruals but that have been amended to limit those accruals to some or all of the employees who participated in the plan on a specified date.

In December 2013, the IRS released Notice 2014-5, which permitted certain employers that sponsor closed DB plans and also sponsor a defined contribution (DC) plan to demonstrate the aggregated plans comply with the nondiscrimination requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(4) on the basis of equivalent benefits, even if the aggregated plans do not satisfy the current conditions for individual testing on that basis. In the recently released Notice 2015-28, the IRS extends the relief for an additional year by applying that relief to plan years beginning before 2017 if the conditions of Notice 2014-5 are satisfied.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

A significant number of DB plans have been closed to new entrants, and the plan sponsor of a closed DB plan typically provides a DC plan for its new hires, the IRS said. Under these arrangements, in the early years after the DB plan has been closed to new entrants, the plan may be able to satisfy the coverage requirement of § 410(b) without being aggregated with the DC plan. However, the § 410(b) minimum coverage test typically becomes more difficult for the closed DB plan to satisfy over time, as grandfathered employees in the old system typically build seniority and become more highly compensated than younger workers entering the DC plan.

If the closed DB plan cannot satisfy the coverage requirement of § 410(b) on its own, it will need to be aggregated with another plan in order to satisfy that coverage requirement, the IRS continued. If the DB plan is aggregated with a DC plan that covers the employer’s new hires to satisfy the coverage requirement, then it is also required to be aggregated with the DC plan for purposes of satisfying the nondiscrimination requirements of § 401(a)(4). In the typical case, the aggregated plans will fail the requirements of § 401(a)(4) unless they are permitted to demonstrate compliance with the nondiscrimination requirements on the basis of equivalent benefits.

The IRS said the extension described Notice 2015-28 is provided in anticipation of the issuance of proposed permanent amendments to the § 401(a)(4) regulations.

Last fall, members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance introduced legislation that would make a permanent change in nondiscrimination rules for certain closed DB plans.

Ameriprise Financial Settles ERISA Fee Litigation

Ameriprise will pay $27.5 million to settle a 401(k) excessive fee lawsuit.

Ameriprise Financial has agreed to settle a closely watched Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) suit, Krueger v. Ameriprise Financial, for $27.5 million in plan reimbursements and remedies.

The settlement also includes non-monetary benefits for 401(k) plan employees, according to plaintiffs’ attorney Jerry Schlichter, managing partner of the St. Louis-based firm Schlichter Bogard and Denton. He says the non-monetary relief obtained, in addition to the financial terms, “not only significantly benefits Ameriprise’s employees and retirees but also sets a standard for best practices for plan sponsors.”

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

A joint motion for approval of the settlement was filed by the parties in the court of Judge Susan Richard Nelson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, who must approve the settlement. 

In a complaint originally filed on September 28, 2011, the plaintiffs alleged that Ameriprise failed to ensure that the recordkeeping and management fees and expenses paid out of the assets in its defined contribution 401(k) plan were reasonable. They alleged that the plan’s fiduciaries breached their duties of prudence and loyalty in selecting and retaining proprietary investment options. Further, it was alleged they engaged in prohibited transactions by receiving compensation from the plan as a result of those decisions in order to benefit its subsidiary Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC. 

Ameriprise denied all of the allegations, contended that the fees were reasonable and contended it complied in all respects with the law and did not commit any fiduciary breaches. In the settlement, Ameriprise has agreed to terms designed to strengthen and add value to its 401(k) plan as part of the non-monetary relief, Schlichter says. The settlement period will be three years during which the Minnesota court will retain jurisdiction. 

In a statement to PLANSPONSOR, Ameriprise said: “We have a strong 401(k) plan that is administered for the sole interests of participants. The settlement does not require any changes to our plan, which will maintain the existing broad and competitive selection of investment options and features. The plan has always included funds we manage, as well as funds from other companies and a brokerage window that offers participants additional choice.”

According to the Schlichter announcement, within one year of the effective settlement date, Ameriprise has agreed to conduct a request for proposal (RFP) competitive bidding process for recordkeeping and investment consulting services.  Second, Ameriprise will refrain from receiving compensation for administrative services provided to the plan other than reimbursement of direct expenses from the plan as permitted by ERISA. Third, Ameriprise will pay fees to the plan recordkeeper on a flat fee or per-participant basis. 

Finally, Ameriprise will provide participant statements that comply with all applicable Department of Labor participant disclosure regulations that include a disclosure of all plan expenses paid by the participant (directly or through investment options); a list of all transaction fees paid by the participant; benchmarks for each fund; and statements, in dollar terms, of the money paid by the participant in administrative recordkeeping costs and for each investment option. Ameriprise will also consider the use of collective investment trusts or separately managed accounts and will seek the lowest cost of participation for any collective trusts used. 

Moving forward the plan’s fiduciary committee for investment selection will not include any member who is an executive of Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC or its investment management affiliates. 

An estimated 24,000 current and former Ameriprise employees will benefit from the settlement, Schlichter says.

«