Understanding Tribal Government Retirement Plans

Administering tribal government retirement plans requires understanding of federal law, state law and tribal law.

The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) established that tribal government employee benefit plans would not be treated as governmental plans, unless all the participants in the plan were performing essential governmental and not commercial activities.

So, any tribal employee benefit plans covering any “commercial” employees—for instance, those working in tribal gaming operations—must comply with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code in the same way as employer-sponsored plans in the private sector.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

An exception occurs under 457 regulations, says Jennifer McCoy, senior plan consultant with Strategic Retirement Partners in Shorewood, Illinois. Those regulations do not recognize tribal governments, so they cannot sponsor a 457 governmental plan. As a result, tribal governments commonly set up 403(b) or 401(k) plans, she explains.

“There are general guidelines and facts and circumstance testing that can be applied to determine what functions fall under the government or the enterprise activities,” she says. Tribal governments can sponsor an ERISA-compliant plan that covers the employees of enterprise as well as government entities, or they can sponsor two separate plans: one that is an ERISA-compliant plan for commercial entities, and a non-ERISA plan for government employees. 

McCoy, who has worked with tribal governments using both approaches, explains that the non-ERISA plan for government employees is not subject to compliance testing, Form 5500 filings and disclosure requirements, and plan oversight is self-regulated.

As sovereign nations, explains Cory Blankenship, associate vice president and relationship manager, retirement services at USI Consulting Group in Knoxville, Tennessee, tribes understand their relationship with the federal government as one of government to government. They are at times subject to federal law, which can occasionally limit the tribe’s degree of sovereignty.

“It is our inherent right to govern ourselves and our affairs,” says Blankenship, who is a member of the Cherokee tribe.

Blankenship’s tribe, with lands at the southern Gate of Smoky Mountain National Park, has had a tourism economy since 1940s, with restaurants, gift shops and other retail businesses. He explains that it is the most-visited park in the National Park system, and tribal lands must be crossed to access the park at the southern end in North Carolina.

Blankenship explains the tribe has rolled up all the entities—including a hospital, a school system, vocational opportunities program—into two 501(c)(3)s. Since the tribe’s gaming operation is a commercial operation, its retirement plans are subject to ERISA—but the tribe’s government plan is not.

NEXT: A tribe’s multiple plans

Blankenship’s tribe also offers a defined benefit (DB) plan for elected officials. When someone is elected to a tribal council position, he explains, he does not earn Social Security benefits during that period of service. “For many tribes, when members come into leadership positions they’re there for an extended time,” perhaps six or seven terms, Blankenship explains, during which they do not pay into the Social Security system. The DB was created in order for these members to earn retirement benefits while serving their tribal nation.

What tribes want, Blankenship says, is to know that the plan is keeping pace, making sure it’s well funded, that the tribe sponsoring the plan understands actuarial values, where the tribe needs to be, and the future liabilities.

The plan should promote the social and financial well-being of a tribe. Since the tribe provides employment to tribal members, across different tribes situations can vary. For example, some 80 or so tribes across the country have access to gaming. Blankenship explains that because of geography, other tribes may not be as fortunate—perhaps the location makes them less likely to take advantage of tourism, or they cannot enter the gaming space because of some federal acknowledgement that prevents the enterprise.

Some, new to economic development and with almost no previous opportunities for competitive wages, now want to be able to provide benefits and opportunities for growth, and a plan should allow enrolled members to be able to retire with good benefits, Blankenship says.

Many tribes are concerned about Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regulations, Blankenship says, with some taking the position they are not subject to these regulations because they are sovereign nations, but any practitioner of Indian law knows that this would be the case only when a federal law has explicit language that excludes Indian tribes. Each tribe does business differently, Blankenship explains, with some only doing business by consensus and others more willing to delegate decisions to some members.

An Indian tribe is not just any other government, Blankenship says. “Its functions are unique and complex. You really need a team that understands federal law, state law and tribal law.”

A Plan Sponsor Transfers Nonqualified DB Plan Risks

Many plan sponsors have used annuity purchases for their qualified DB plans to ensure participants’ benefits are protected from market volatility; a similar strategy can be used for nonqualified DBs.

When Ralph Balestriere, CFO of the Red Wing Shoe Company in Red Wing Minnesota, came to the company in 2010, he found its qualified defined benefit (DB) plan assets were mismanaged in the recessionary period.

The wrong investment vehicles were used; the plans were banking on interest rates rising, which didn’t happen. “I said, this is enough, let’s get out of our DB plans,” he tells PLANSPONSOR. “We are not in the pension business, and we don’t have a lot of resources to manage investment strategy in our DBs.” The company offers three qualified DB plans as well as a nonqualified DB plan—the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP)—and a nonqualified deferred compensation plan.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

According to Balestriere, the company has had a de-risking strategy for its DB plans for the last three years. It’s using a de-risking glide path for investments; has offered a lump-sum window for vested, terminated participants; and has received a prohibited transaction exemption from the Department of Labor (DOL) to contribute some shares of the company into its plans.

With the end goal of making sure the DB plans were not subject to market volatility, once the SERP became 100% funded, Red Wing decided to do an annuity buy-in. Balestriere says he presented the decision to the company’s board in December 2015 and they were enthusiastic about it—three of the board members are participants in the plan.

The task of finding the right annuity provider was given to Red Wing’s adviser since 1995, Mesirow Financial. Greg Giles, president of the compensation and executive benefit strategies group and senior managing director at Mesirow in Chicago, says Mesirow vetted insurance companies and interviewed them. “The approach we took was to use DOL Interpretive Bulletin 95-1 guidance for annuity selection for qualified plans,” he tells PLANSPONSOR. “We recognized we were not being held to that fiduciary standard, but it made sense to hold insurance companies to standards and evaluate pricing.” Pacific Life was chosen as the annuity buy-in provider in 2016.

NEXT: The buy-in and its benefits

Giles adds, “This was one of most fun, creative, exciting things we’ve worked on in a long time. This forced us to think outside the box, to take strategies used in qualified plans and use them for nonqualified plans.”

While the complete plan de-risking process took years, once Pacific Life was selected, the transaction was closed within 30 days. The SERP has about $26 million in assets and 20 participants, 15 of whom are retired. The difference between a pension buy-out and buy-in is that, with a buy-in, the company still keeps responsibility for the plan payments and communications with participants. The transaction was seamless to participants. According to Giles, it was a corporate finance transaction to secure the plan’s balance sheet from longevity risk and invisible to participants.

So, the buy-in has eliminated the market volatility risk for the plan. “We don’t have to worry about another recession anymore,” Balestriere says. But, it also has addressed longevity risk.

Giles explains that the SERP does not offer lump-sums, but offers lifetime annuities to participants and surviving spouses. “When we looked at potential payouts, we were betting on the mortality of not only participants, but spouses. So how much do we fund the rabbi trust assuming mortality when some outliers could live to 103?” The buy-in makes sure payments will be provided.

Balestriere says he would tell other nonqualified DB plan sponsors it was a very simple, logical, easy process, and he felt comfortable with the transaction. “It was a no-brainer, and it helps you sleep better at night.” But, he says plan sponsors should realize it is not cheap. There is an expense and it has to be recorded on profit/loss statements. Plan sponsors should be ready to accept that.

«