2023 HSA Conference: HSA Administration Structure

The proper administration of health savings accounts by plan sponsors is critical so employers do not face ERISA regulations, experts explained.

Plan sponsors offering health savings accounts must be careful to practice proper administration—by following Department of Labor and IRS guidance—or risk being subject to Employee Retirement Income and Security Act regulations.

Although employer-provided high-deductible health plans are subject to ERISA, the associated HSA offered to employees is generally not, as long as the employer limits its involvement with the HSA, explained panelists at PLANSPONSOR’s 2023 HSA Conference.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“It’s very important that these requirements be followed strictly, because if [plan sponsors] slip up and do not comply with one of them, you are stepping into ERISA territory,” said Carol Buckmann, partner at Cohen and Buckmann PC.

Employers have turned to offering HDHPs to limit the costs of health insurance, and an HSA is often paired with the HDHP as an additional benefit for employees.

Appropriate plan sponsor use of the HSA benefit requires employers to observe several “special rules that have been promulgated by the Department of Labor” to limit involvement with the HSA so that it will not be treated as an ERISA plan, Buckmann explained.

For HSA providers and plan sponsors, it is not in the best interest of either to be regulated under ERISA, added Buckmann.Plan sponsors and vendors regulated under ERISA “are going to have difficulty finding an administrator who will take on an HSA plan that is subject to ERISA, [because] … they know that’s a lot more exposure,” Buckmann said.

HSA Administration

The DOL and IRS rules must be followed by plan sponsors to limit involvement with the HSA, preventing the greater oversight, paperwork and regulation that would be required under ERISA.   

Proper plan sponsor HSA use requires employee participation to be voluntary, although employers may use automatic enrollment; employers cannot limit the ability of employees to transfer assets to different HSA administrators; employers cannot limit the use of HSA funds or withdrawals; employers cannot influence employees’ HSA investment decisions; and employers must offer a reasonable availability of investment options, Buckmann explained.  

Under DOL guidance, the “broad range of investment alternatives” standard can be satisfied by the plan sponsor including a minimum of three investment options, said Ellen Goodwin of Groom Law Group.

“Probably 99% of the HSAs out there in the world work diligently to avoid ERISA coverage,” said Goodwin. “The Department of Labor has really provided a road map for employers, and almost all HSAs are set up to follow this roadmap.”

In-Plan Investments

Invested account dollars—HSA assets not held in cash deposits—were $33.8 billion at year-end 2022, compared to $34.4 billion a year earlier and $23.8 billion at the close of 2020, research by Devenir found recently.

HSA holders can invest savings via investment lineups to cover qualified medical expenses, but plan fiduciaries should avoid influencing the investment offerings beyond selecting the provider, Goodwin said.

“It’s clear from DOL guidance that an employer can choose one or more providers to make HSAs available to employees, and those providers can offer the providers own curated lineup of investment alternatives,” Goodwin said. “That’s fine, but an employer should always seek to avoid customizing the providers lineup by striking particular funds from the lineup or adding new ones to the lineup. That you don’t want to do, because that can be viewed as influencing participant investment decisions and could cross you into the line of ERISA territory.”

DOL guidance affirms a plan sponsor can replicate the same menu offered in the 401(k) in the HSA or a subset of the lineup and still remain not be covered by ERISA, Goodwin added.

Plan sponsors will want to check beforehand, however, if certain conduct will spill over into ERISA territory. If they are unsure, they should check with in-house or outside employee benefits counsel, Buckmann added.

“You should be very cautious about crossing over the line, because there are many consequences, including [the plan sponsor] may find fact participants suing for losses because you’ve breached your fiduciary responsibilities, [and ] there’s possible fiduciary responsibility for administrators,” she said.

Plan Consequences

Plan sponsors with an HSA benefit that does fall under ERISA requirements will have to: complete a Form 5500 with the IRS and DOL Form 5500 every year and have a summary plan description for the benefit. Plan sponsors will also face greater regulatory risks and fiduciary liability if covered by ERISA, Buckmann said.

Better Late Than Never: New Bill Would Permit CITs in 403(b)s

A bill is planned to amend securities laws, close a SECURE 2.0 loophole and clear the way for CITs in 403(b) plans.

Representative Frank Lucas, R-Oklahoma, plans to introduce legislation that would amend several securities laws to permit collective investment trusts to be used in 403(b) plans for the first time.

The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 updated tax law to permit CITs into 403(b)s, but it did not update the necessary securities laws to do the same. Without both changes, CITs cannot be used in 403(b) plans. CITs are similar to mutual funds but, due to lower regulatory requirements, tend to have lower fees.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Lucas’ bill would specifically amend the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933 to permit the use of CITs by 403(b) plans.

CITs and mutual funds are both pooled investment vehicles that follow stated investment objectives and strategies, but CITs are not subject to the prospectus and financial reporting requirements or the expense rules of securities laws.

The provisions of SECURE 2.0 that would have permitted CITs in 403(b)s originated in the House Committee on Ways and Means, but the House Committee on Financial Services asserted jurisdiction over the securities law aspect of the changes, and some committee members had concerns about the changes. Ultimately, there was not enough time to pass both sets of amendments before the new Congress was sworn in.

The Financial Services Committee chair is now Representative Patrick McHenry, R-North Carolina, which may improve the provisions’ odds of final passage, though the concept of harmonizing 403(b) and 401(a) plans has broad support.

David Ashner, an ERISA attorney with Groom Law Group, says the Lucas bill would update all three laws necessary to make this correction and allow CITs to be used by 403(b)s. He says “there is nothing missing here,” and the bill as written would complete a very popular objective of the SECURE 2.0 project that did not find its way into the December 2022 legislation.

Robert Abramowitz, a partner in the Morgan Lewis law firm, says updating all three acts would remove any ambiguity about whether CITs are permitted investment structures for use in 403(b) plans, and this should be the final act required.

403(b) plans are currently the only tax-preferred retirement plan that does not have access to CITs. Ashner says of the tax law changes that the “whole point of this is to get parity” between different defined contribution-style retirement plans.

Lucas’ office did not return a request for comment.

«