457s Popular Supplemental Retirement Plans for Governments
March 4, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – Supplemental retirement plans are important to employers and employees of state and local governments, says a new issue brief.
“Supplemental Retirement Plans Offered by City and County
Governments,” from the Center for State and Local Government
Excellence, examines 20 municipalities around the United States and finds 457 plans are the dominant supplemental plan type (see “457 Plan Reflections”), with
almost all plans being locally managed and using a single vendor. Some municipalities
offer 401(k) plans, with a few offering 401(a) and 403(b) plans.
“With the recent recession and the aging of the Baby Boomer
population, there has been a growing concern about the financial status of
public pension funds and the financial sustainability of governmental spending
on retirement benefits,” say the authors of the brief. “If future generations
of public employees are going to have adequate retirement income, they will
need to save more, both on their own and through supplemental retirement saving
plans.”
The brief also finds that with these supplemental plans:
The number of investment options differs;
While most allow loans, only four of the 20 plans
studied have employer matching contributions; and
Employees have access to information about the plans
from local employer, vendor or state websites, high-quality information is not
always available.
According to the authors of the brief, “To understand the
importance of 457 and 401(k) plans for city and county employees more fully, it
is important to determine participation and contributions rates, and to
determine whether the factors highlighted in this brief influence employee
retirement savings behavior.”
March 4, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - In a stronger position, new choices are being made in the management of pensions in Russell Investments’ $20 billion club.
The
$20 billion club consists of 19 corporations that together represent roughly
40% of the pension assets and liabilities of all U.S. publicly-listed
corporations. Their combined pension deficit had been growing in recent years
as interest rates have fallen. But 2013 saw a sharp reversal of that pattern,
with more than $100 billion wiped off of the deficit thanks to strong asset
performance and a rise in interest rates of almost 0.9%.
According
to Bob Collie, FIA, chief research strategist of Americas Institutional at
Russell, the median discount rate used to value U.S. plan liabilities—which had
fallen from 6.4% to 4.0% in the previous four years—rose to 4.89%. This alone
accounted for a gain of some $69 billion. Helped by another strong year on the
asset side and plans sponsor contributions, this meant that over 40% of the
deficit was wiped out; the net shortfall of assets below liabilities fell by
some $106 billion.
Investment
returns—which totaled almost 9%—comfortably outpaced the interest cost on liabilities.
Contributions from plan sponsors were around $27 billion, which was almost
double the value of new benefit accruals. While only Bank of America has
worldwide pension assets in excess of liabilities, that goal is now within
sight for a number of these corporations.
“This
improved position is affecting how plans are being managed,” Collie says in a
recent article. Smaller shortfalls mean smaller contributions, less investment
risk and a growing emphasis on defined contribution.
From a low of $12
billion in 2008 (less than the value of new benefit accruals that year), plan
sponsor contributions averaged more than $25 billion a year from 2009 to 2013
due to catch-up contributions required as a result of the losses of 2008. But
as deficits shrink, the need for continued catch-up contributions also shrinks.
MAP-21
may also have some effect on contribution levels in 2014 (see “The Impact of MAP-21”). As a result, expected contributions for 2014 disclosed
in the latest reports came to some $14.3 billion. “With a combined total
shortfall of $114 billion, catch-up contributions will continue to be required
from several of these corporations for the next few years, but probably not at
the level that seemed likely a year ago,” Collie says.
With
the improved funding position, many plans are moving to liability-driven investing
(LDI). For example, according to Collie, Ford’s 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission notes that they have
“adopted a broad global pension derisking strategy” as a result of which they
expect to reach an 80% fixed income allocation in the U.S. “over the next few
years as the plans achieve full funding”. In a similar vein, United Technologies’
10-K notes that “the interest rate hedge is dynamically increased as funded status
improves.”
Collie
points out that one observation that came out of last year’s analysis of the
$20 billion club was that the 2012 liability value of $915 billion was possibly
as large as the liabilities were ever going to get. “Those liabilities fell by more
than $73 billion in 2013 and, barring a substantial drop in interest rates, it
looks like 2012 was indeed ‘peak pension’: America’s private sector defined
benefit system is now officially shrinking,” he says.
As
of the end of 2012 (the most recent publicly available data) the defined
contribution plans of the $20 billion club totaled about $400 billion in the
U.S. alone; less than the defined benefit assets of these corporations, but catching
up fast. “The $20 billion club is a club that was chosen based on the size of defined
benefit plans, but even here we see the steady rise of DC,” Collie says.
The 19
corporations that make up the $20 billion club are AT&T, General Electric,
Northrop Grumman, Bank of America, General Motors, Pfizer, Boeing, Dow Chemical,
Hewlett-Packard, Honeywell, Raytheon, United Parcel Service, E.I. DuPont de
Nemours, IBM, United Technologies, Exxon Mobil, Lockheed Martin, Verizon
Communications and Ford.