4th Circuit Revives Case Over Transfers to Cash Balance Plan

The appellate court found that Bank of America’s closing agreement with the IRS did not make the case moot.

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that participants in Bank of America’s cash balance plan still have a claim for relief for illegal transfers of their 401(k) account balances to the cash balance plan.

The appellate court first determined that the plaintiffs had standing to sue under Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Section 502(a)(3), which provides that a plan beneficiary may obtain “appropriate equitable relief” to redress “any act or practice which violates” ERISA provisions contained in a certain subchapter of the United States Code. The court found that the transfers violated ERISA’s anti-cutback provisions, as determined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) during a plan audit, and that the relief the plaintiffs are seeking—the profits Bank of America made from the assets transferred—is “appropriate equitable relief.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The 4th Circuit noted that the U.S. Supreme Court found that “[a] case becomes moot only when it is impossible for a court to grant any effectual relief whatever to the prevailing party.” The court said, “If an accounting ultimately shows that the bank retained no profit, the case may well then become moot.  But as long as the parties have a concrete interest, however small, in the outcome of the litigation, the case is not moot.” 

Finally, the court determined that the statute of limitations of 10 years under North Carolina trust law applied in the case. The first of the transfers in question took place in 1998, and the plaintiffs filed suit in 2004, so their claims are not time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

NEXT: Case background.

In 1998, NationsBank amended its 401(k) plan to give eligible participants a one-time opportunity to transfer their account balances to its defined benefit cash balance plan. The cash balance plan allowed participants to select investment options, but they were purely notional, and participants were credited with what their accounts would have received if invested in those options. The bank invested plan assets in investments of its choosing, and if those investments earned more than the return applied to participants’ accounts, the bank kept the difference.

The plaintiffs filed their lawsuit in 2004, seeking to obtain the profits the bank was keeping. In 2005, after an audit of the bank’s plan, the IRS issued a technical advice memorandum, in which it concluded that the transfers of 401(k) plan participants’ assets to the cash balance plan between 1998 and 2001 violated Internal Revenue Code § 411(d)(6) and Treasury Regulation § 1-411(d)-4, Q&A-3(a)(2). According to the IRS, the transfers impermissibly eliminated the 401(k) plan participants’ “separate account feature,” meaning that participants were no longer being credited with the actual gains and losses “generated by funds contributed on the participant[s’] behalf.”

The IRS determination led a federal district court to move the participants’ case forward. However, the bank entered into a closing agreement with the IRS, paying a $10 million fine and setting up a special-purpose 401(k) plan to restore participants’ accounts. The district court determined that, following the closing agreement, the participants no longer had standing to sue.

The appellate court reversed the district court’s decision and remanded the case for further proceedings.

The opinion in Pender v. Bank of America Corporation is here.

Franklin Templeton Expands TDF Series

The firm has added a 2055 fund to its target-date fund series.

Franklin Templeton Investments has expanded its retirement target fund lineup for U.S. investors with the introduction of Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund.

Like other funds in the lineup, the fund’s assets are allocated among the broad asset classes of equity, fixed-income and alternative investments by investing predominantly in other Franklin Templeton mutual funds, based on each underlying fund’s predominant asset class and strategy. The new fund joins a lineup that includes 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045 and 2050 funds.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“The Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund is aimed at Millennial investors who plan to retire in or near the year 2055 and reflects our ongoing commitment to innovating solutions for the retirement marketplace,” says Yaqub Ahmed, head of the investment-only division in the U.S. for Franklin Templeton Investments.

Like the existing Franklin LifeSmart Retirement Target Funds, the new 2055 fund will target a 5% allocation to alternative investment funds to take advantage of their lower correlation, in general, with traditional asset classes. The funds’ managers have the ability to tactically adjust this allocation within a range of 0% to 10% as they shift the funds’ allocations based on changing market conditions.

“As part of our continued efforts to generate better designed retirement funds, we include a strategic weighting to alternative investment funds for each of our Franklin LifeSmart Retirement Target Funds,” says Tom Nelson, one of the funds’ portfolio managers with Franklin Templeton Solutions. “We have found through extensive research and modeling that this asset class may provide diversification benefits and may help improve the risk/return profile of these portfolios.”

Each of the Franklin LifeSmart Retirement Target Funds is organized as a “fund of funds” that invests primarily in three specialized managers—Franklin, Templeton and Mutual Series—and may also include an array of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for additional diversification. The range follows a “to retirement” glide path, which means that each of the funds reaches its most conservative allocation at its target date.

«