Money Isn't Everything, American Workers Say

January 4, 2008 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Given a list of 15 benefits and characteristics that may be important in choosing a job, "how much one is paid, the total compensation" ranked 10th among American workers surveyed.

The health insurance plan offered with the job ranked at the top of the list, with 84% saying it is very important, according to the survey report. Job security and clarity in the rules at work ranked next (82% each), followed by the retirement or pension plan offered with the job (76%).

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The fifth-ranked important job characteristic was working in a flexible, family-friendly workplace, chosen by 71% of respondents.

The survey found differences among demographic groups. Health insurance was ranked high by more women than men (89% v. 78%), as was a retirement plan (81% v. 72%). A family-friendly workplace also received more votes from women.

Eight of the characteristics ranked as more important by minority Americans than by white Americans and none were less important.

Having the potential for promotions is very important to Gen X workers (74% of those age 18-29), compared with Baby Boomers (58% of those age 42-61). Job security was also more important to the Gen X group (88%) than Boomers (79%), the report said.

The retirement plan at work ranked as very important to 84% of government employees, 72% of those in private business, and 73% of those who work for non-profits. In several key areas respondents said state and local jobs offer better options.

In terms of overall job benefits, a majority (58%) said state and local government is better; 23% see no difference, and 14% said private jobs are better. The numbers are almost exactly the same for job security, where 58% said state and local careers are better. Sixty-two percent of private-sector workers and 63% of government workers agreed that government jobs provide better benefits.

The telephone survey of 1,200 adults age 18 and older in the continental United States was conducted October 24, 2007 – November 4, 2007, by Princeton Survey Research AssociatesInternational for The Center for State and Local Government Excellence.

The survey report, Security: What Americans want from a job, is here .

African American Former Employee to Get $2.5M from Lockheed

January 3, 2008 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Lockheed Martin Corp. has agreed to pay $2.5 million to an African American former employee to settle charges of harassment and discrimination.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) described the settlement as the largest individual payment for racial-discrimination claims it has obtained. Legal experts said the case may cause employers to re-examine policies around racial harassment and workplace discrimination, the WSJ reported.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

In the lawsuit, filed in 2005 in U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, the EEOC claimed Charles Daniels, an aviation electrician with Lockheed from 1999 to 2001, was subjected to racial harassment by co-workers on a daily basis and threats of retaliation – including lynching – after he complained to supervisors. The EEOC alleged the company refused to discipline the harassers.

However, Lockheed said the “characterization of the facts” is false. Company spokesman Joe Stout told the WSJ that several of the allegations were not reported to the company. When management learned of the matter it “conducted investigations and took the appropriate remedial actions based on the facts presented at that time,” he stated, according to the news report.

Stout said Lockheed decided to settle because it was in the best interests of the company and Daniels to put the matter behind them. He added that employees involved in the matter have left the company or are being terminated, and the company has barred individuals in the case from working at the company in the future.

Stout noted that Lockheed has clear policies against discrimination and it promotes diversity, and he pointed out there are no other discrimination suits relating to the Lockheed unit where Daniels worked.

The settlement agreement is here .

«