DOL Plans Research Study About Retirement Strategies

The Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration has asked plan sponsors and their service provider partners for help on a major upcoming research project. 

Hoping to assess the impact of its information collection requirements and to minimize the reporting burden related to upcoming research projects, the Department of Labor’s (DOL) Employee Benefit Security Administration (EBSA) is asking for the retirement planning industry’s help.

EBSA says it is soliciting comments on the usefulness of a forthcoming information collection request (ICR), which the regulator is planning to use to conduct a multi-year household survey that will investigate retirement planning and decisionmaking. Beyond looking to minimize the cost and time impact of compliance and reporting, EBSA says it also hopes this request for comment will ultimately help the public understand the Department’s information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The call for comments comes as the EBSA is “planning to undertake a long-term research study to develop a panel that will track U. S. households over several years in order to collect data and answer important research questions about how retirement planning strategies and decisions evolve over time.” In explaining the project, DOL says it believes “still relatively little is known about how people make planning and financial decisions before and during retirement.”

As the EBSA’s request for comment explains, a major hurdle to retirement research is the lack of data about how people make these decisions related to retirement. “Gaining insight into Americans’ decisionmaking processes and experiences will provide policymakers and the research community with valuable information that can be used to guide future policy and research,” DOL says. “This investigation will explore a set of research questions on retirement savings, investments, and drawdown behavior by conducting a study that tracks retirees and future retirees over an extended period.”

A main goal of the project will be to “combine household reports of such items as retirement account contributions and investment allocations with survey responses on planning methods and strategies and on financial advice received to perform a cross-sectional analysis, conditional on other respondent attributes.”

NEXT: More about the project’s goals 

EBSA hopes that eventually “multiple waves of data” will be drawn from various surveys and will be utilized to analyze how retirement planning strategies, decisions, and outcomes evolve over time.

“Prior to administering the surveys, the data collection instruments will be pretested via cognitive interviews, pilot surveys, and debriefing of respondents to the pilot surveys,” EBSA explains.

At this preliminary stage, EBSA says it is particularly interested in comments that evaluate whether the collections of information described above are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility. EBSA also wants to “evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the collections of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., by permitting electronic submissions of responses.”

Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the ICRs for Office of Management and Budget approval of the necessary extensions of the DOL's information collection authority; they will also become a matter of public record, EBSA notes.

The full request for commentary appears here and will be published in the February 29, 2016, edition of the Federal Register. Responses are due within 60 days. 

Wells Fargo Sees Growth in CIT Use

CITs have been made more accessible for small to mid-size retirement plans.

Wells Fargo announced it has experienced a 37% increase in the number of collective investment trusts (CITs) being offered in retirement plans it recordkeeps, and a 57% increase in CIT assets, from the end of 2012 to end of 2015.

“Without question, we’ve seen more growth in the small to mid-size plan market,” Jeff Kletti, head of Investments at Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement and Trust in Minneapolis, tells PLANSPONSOR. He adds that there is still growth in the large plan space, but it is not as high since large plans have had more access to CITs all along.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Kletti attributes the growth of CITs overall to a combination of media attention and recent litigation. “I think more plans are open to exploring more options, including CITs,” he says, adding that it doesn’t mean CITs are the only way to deliver lower costs and are not necessarily right for every plan.

As for growth in Wells Fargo’s own business, Kletti says the company has provided more education to plan sponsors to make sure they understand how CITs work and know the differences between CITs and mutual funds. As a result, more plan sponsors are familiar now with CITs.

In addition, Kletti attributes the growth of CIT use in Wells Fargo’s business to the type of products it launched in 2012. Wells Fargo consolidated and restructured its legacy CIT offering, and launched its first non-affiliated manager strategies for CITs. Kletti explains that mostly asset managers offer CITs, and historically, they have had high asset minimums typically restricting the use of CITs to only the largest plans. “We wanted to bring the idea to plans that didn’t have access in past,” he says. Wells Fargo offers CITs with no minimums, allowing plans of all sizes to access these potentially lower-cost options.

“Personally, I think CIT adoption will only pick up,” Kletti concludes.

«