Retirement Security Act of 2019 Introduced

The bipartisan legislation is designed to help close the $7.7 trillion retirement savings gap. 

Senators Susan Collins, R-Maine, chairman of the Senate Aging Committee, and Maggie Hassan, D-New Hampshire, have introduced the Retirement Security Act of 2019.

The bill would permit more businesses to join multiple employer plans (MEP), which the Senators say would help lower retirement plan costs by permitting businesses to pool their buying power and otherwise share administrative fees. The bill would protect members of a MEP from losing their tax benefits if another employer in the MEP fails to meet the minimum criteria necessary to obtain tax benefits.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The bill would also direct the Department of the Treasury to simplify and consolidate required plan notices in order to reduce costs, and it would permit employers to provide matches of up to 10%.

“As chairman of the Senate Aging Committee, ensuring that more people are better prepared for retirement is one of my top priorities,” Collins said. “Our bipartisan legislation would significantly improve the financial security of many Americans by reducing the cost and complexity of retirement plans, especially for small businesses.”

Collins noted that data from the Center for Retirement Research has found there is a $7.7 trillion gap between what Americans need for a secure retirement and what they actually  have.

(b)lines Ask the Experts – Who Is Responsible for Maintaining Beneficiary Designations?

Experts from Groom Law Group and Cammack Retirement Group answer questions concerning 403(b) plans and regulations.

“We have gotten into a bit of a misunderstanding with our 403(b) plan recordkeeper as to who is responsible for maintaining updated beneficiary designations. Who is ultimately responsible for maintaining such designations?”

 

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Stacey Bradford, Kimberly Boberg, David Levine and David Powell, with Groom Law Group, and Michael A. Webb, vice president, Retirement Plan Services, Cammack Retirement Group, answer:

 

As with many compliance questions, the answer to this one resides, at least initially, in your plan document. The document should contain language stating precisely who is responsible for maintaining plan records, which would include beneficiary designations. In many plan documents, the entity responsible is the plan administrator, which is typically the employer or a committee.

 

However, that does NOT mean that the responsibility cannot be delegated to a recordkeeper via a service agreement with that provider, and in this age of electronic enrollment, that is often the case. However, the Experts have come across situations, particularly in smaller plans, where the plan sponsor thought the recordkeeper was maintaining the records, but the recordkeeper thought the plan sponsor was maintaining the records! Obviously, this is not a good situation and should be avoided.

 

Thus, plan sponsors should review the service agreement with their recordkeeper and confirm whether the recordkeeper is responsible for obtaining and storing beneficiary designations. In addition, there needs to be clear procedures in place that ensure that beneficiary records are properly updated for life events, such as marriage, divorce, etc. Finally, since the plan participants are often the weak link in the beneficiary designation chain, plan sponsors/recordkeepers should communicate to participants on a regular basis the importance of updating their beneficiary designations.

 

 

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.

 

Do YOU have a question for the Experts? If so, we would love to hear from you! Simply forward your question to Rebecca.Moore@strategic-i.com with Subject: Ask the Experts, and the Experts will do their best to answer your question in a future Ask the Experts column.

«