Sen. Warren Says Annuity ‘Perks and Kickbacks’ Rampant

Senator Elizabeth Warren issued a report about collusion between the annuity and advisory industries that is nothing short of scathing.

U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) released a new report that is sure to cause controversy in the retirement advice industry, finding as it does that annuity providers use “expensive vacations to European castles and villas, beach getaways, free iPads, golf outings, expensive jewelry and more” to incentivize advisers to put their own interest ahead of clients.

Warren, who has been a vocal supporter of President Obama’s retirement-minded policies, says her new report highlights the need for a strong federal conflict of interest rule to protect retirees, such as the ongoing rulemaking effort at the Department of Labor.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The report examines “15 leading annuities providers” who supplied answers to letters sent by Senator Warren earlier this year. Warren says the results clearly highlight the ways that annuity companies can incentivize agents to put their own interests ahead of their clients.

“Overall, 13 of the 15 companies investigated admitted to offering kickbacks either directly to agents, indirectly through third-party gift payments, or both,” Warren says, adding she will continue to use her power as a U.S. Senator to oppose the status quo of high finance. “Two of the 15 leading annuities providers indicated that they refuse to provide non-cash direct or indirect kickbacks, suggesting it is straightforward, though uncommon, to build a successful advising business without offering such inducements.”

Warren says companies “shouldn’t be allowed to offer expensive vacations, prizes and other kickbacks to agents in exchange for selling costly, second-rate investment products to unsuspecting customers.”

NEXT: Role of third-party marketers questioned 

Other findings of the report suggest annuity companies also create conflicts of interest and evade some existing restrictions “by offering perks and inducements to annuity sales agents through third-party marketing organizations.” She adds that “current disclosure rules are inadequate to ensure that customers are informed about the incentives agents receive for selling them specific financial products.”

“Because of loopholes in the law, it is perfectly legal for some advisers to steer customers into complex financial products that will earn the highest rewards, perks and prizes for the advisers—even if they are bad options for their customers,” Warren says.

For its part, the annuity industry was quick to fire back and challenge Senator Warren’s assertions. In a statement shared with PLANSPONSOR, the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) reminds investors that annuities are a highly diverse product set and “are the only financial products in the marketplace that guarantee lifetime income.”

Carl Wilkerson, ACLI vice president and chief counsel for securities and litigation, says ACLI and its member firms are “disappointed with the report issued today by Sen. Elizabeth Warren because it may raise inappropriate and unnecessary worries among retirees and workers considering retirement about an insurance product that that can provide financial security and peace of mind. Americans need continued, viable access to guaranteed lifetime income. Life insurers paid out $74 billion in annuity benefit payments in 2014.”

Wilkerson, unsurprisingly, says the senator’s report “misrepresents the comprehensive regulatory framework that governs conduct in the sale of insurance products and protects consumers’ interests.” Life insurers comply with laws that regulate permitted non-cash compensation practices and support their full enforcement, he adds.

“Life insurers remain fully committed to providing Americans the products and services they need to meet their financial and retirement security needs.”

A PDF copy of Senator Warren's report is available here.

Some Buildings Promote Better Productivity than Others

Improved indoor environmental quality doubled participants’ scores on cognitive function tests, according to a study by researchers at the Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health’s Center for Health and the Global Environment, SUNY Upstate Medical University and Syracuse University.

Employees’ cognitive performance scores averaged 101% higher in green building environments with enhanced ventilation compared to a conventional building environment. “We know green buildings conserve natural resources, minimize environmental impacts and improve the indoor environment, but these results show they can also become important human resource tools for all indoor environments where cognitive abilities are critical to productivity, learning and safety,” says John Mandyck, chief sustainability officer for United Technologies, the primary supporter of the study.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The double-blind study evaluated the cognitive performance of 24 participants who performed normal work activity in a laboratory setting that simulates conditions found in conventional and green buildings, as well as green buildings with enhanced ventilation. At the end of each day, participants completed a 1.5-hour cognitive assessment. Researchers measured cognitive function for nine functional domains, including basic, applied and focused activity levels; task orientation; crisis response; information seeking; information usage; breadth of approach; and strategy.

The largest improvements in cognitive function test scores occurred in the areas of crisis response, information usage and strategy. Crisis response scores were 97% higher for employees in the green environment and 131% higher for the green environment with enhanced ventilation and lower carbon dioxide levels compared to the conventional environment. Information usage scores for green and enhanced green environments were 172% and 299% higher than in the conventional environment, respectively. For strategy, green and enhanced green scores were 183% and 288% higher than the conventional environment.

“This study suggests that indoor environments can have a profound impact on the decision-making performance of workers, which is a primary indicator of worker productivity,” says Dr. Joseph Allen, Assistant Professor of Exposure Assessment Science at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Director of the Healthy Buildings Program at the Center for Health and the Global Environment at Harvard Chan School, and Principal Investigator for the study.

The full report is available at www.CHGEHarvard.org/COGfxStudy and www.theCOGfxStudy.com.

«

 

You’re viewing the second of three free articles.

 Subscribe to a free PW Newsletter! 

…subscribing gets you free access to PW’s online content!

If you’re a subscriber, please login.