SageView Advisory Group has hired Kerrie Casey to deliver retirement planning services from within its Boston practice.
Casey has 19 years of experience delivering retirement plan
consulting services to corporate and not-for-profit plan sponsors, the firm
says. In her new role as retirement plan consultant with SageView, Casey will
be a lead contact for new clients choosing to work with the firm. She will also
drive vendor requests for proposals (RFPs) and focus on strategic plan design and
tactical delivery of retirement benefits for plan sponsor clients.
Casey will also participate on the firm’s investment
committee. Stephen R. Popper, the managing director of SageView’s Boston office, says Casey “brings a wealth of knowledge and experience … that will enable our client’s retirement
plan committees to make knowledgeable, sound decisions that can stand the test
of time.”
Casey’s background includes recordkeeping, employee
education, implementation, compliance and consulting at Fidelity, Tofias,
Sentinel Benefits and MMA-New England, formerly the Bostonian Group. She earned
a bachelor’s of science in finance from Bentley College and a master’s in arts
from UMass Boston. She holds multiple securities registrations, is a qualified
401(k) administrator and an accredited investment
fiduciary.
A loss of liquidity in global fixed-income markets, as well as other factors, has set the stage for what could be significant increases in institutional use of bond ETFs, a study finds.
Bond
exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are taking on an increasingly vital role in
institutional portfolios as regulations have forced global bond dealers to
reduce their inventories and market-making activities.
Regulations have sapped liquidity from
the bond markets, according to the results of a new study, “Bond Market Challenges Continue to Drive Demand for Fixed-Income ETFs,” from Greenwich Associates. Meanwhile,
historically low interest rates are forcing investors to search for yield,
while simultaneously preparing for a long-expected pick-up in rates and
volatility.
Over
the past 12 months, institutions’ need for liquidity has been a primary driver
of fixed-income ETF demand. More than half of the institutions in the study that
have experienced liquidity problems say these issues have had a direct impact
on their investment processes. While institutions of all types have struggled
with reduced liquidity in bond markets, ETFs have not suffered the same fate as other bond investment vehicles. Since 2008, bond ETF liquidity has grown more than four and a half times, or at
an annual growth rate of 33%, according to Greenwich Associates.
Those
dynamics are boosting institutional demand for ETFs. “Overall, 59% of
fixed-income ETF investors in the study reported they have increased their
usage since 2011, with growing numbers of institutional investors turning to
ETFs as a liquidity enhancement tool,” says Greenwich Associates consultant
Andrew McCollum.
Institutions also are
turning to ETFs to more readily achieve fundamental investment goals. For the
past several years, investors have been adjusting portfolios in response to
historically low yields, the potential for a prolonged rising rate cycle and to
better weather spikes in volatility.
“As
institutions shorten duration, diversify portfolios and seek out sources of
attractive return by shifting assets to specialized and niche investments, they
have found ETFs to be highly flexible tools to address both long-term strategic
and short-term tactical investment objectives,” McCollum says.
These
trends seem poised to keep growth of ETF usage by institutions at robust levels
in the years ahead. One-quarter of the institutions in the study—and 40% of the
investment managers—plan to increase their use of bond ETFs in the coming 12
months.
This
momentum is likely to continue as institutions revisit internal investment
guidelines and limits that had previously capped investors’ use of ETFs. Given
these factors, Greenwich Associates expects fixed-income ETF usage will
continue to build as institutional investors meet the realities of a
challenging fixed-income marketplace with new and broader allocations to this vehicle.
Between
January and March 2015, Greenwich Associates interviewed 128 U.S.-based
institutional investors about their use and perceptions of fixed-income
exchange-traded funds. The
respondent base included 37 investment managers (firms managing assets to
specific investment strategies/guidelines), 27 registered investment advisers,
50 institutional funds (pensions, endowments and foundations), and 14 insurance
companies.
The sample population
comprised 60 current active users of fixed-income ETFs and 68 non-users in
order to determine current and future use of fixed-income ETFs by active users,
as well as the current reasons non-users don't actively use fixed-income ETFs
and their expected future interest.