Data and Research February 27, 2015

Majority of Catholic Dioceses Plan to Freeze Pensions

Eighty percent of Catholic dioceses offer lay employees a 403(b) plan, while 15% offer a 401(k).
Reported by

More than 57% of Catholic dioceses are planning to freeze or terminate their pension plans, according to a survey from USI Consulting Group.

More than three-fourths (76.1%) of respondents have an open and ongoing pension plan for lay employees, while 6.5% have already implemented a soft freeze of their plans and 17.4% have implemented a hard freeze.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Nearly three in ten (28.9%) of Catholic dioceses report their pension plans for lay employees are 80% funded or less. Fifty-three percent said their plans are 81% to 100% funded, and the rest are more than 100% funded.

Eighty percent of the dioceses that responded to the survey indicated they offer lay employees a 403(b) plan—half offer a plan with a diocesan contribution and nearly three in ten offer one without a diocesan contribution. Nearly 15% offer lay employees a 401(k) plan.

Among those that make a diocesan contribution to their defined contribution plans, 35.4% offer a fixed percentage, 16.7% offer a fixed percentage based on years of service, 16.7% offer a matching contribution and 31.2% offer both a fixed percentage and a matching contribution. More than 15% indicated their maximum possible diocesan contribution is 10% or more.

The USI Diocesan Retirement Survey results are based on responses from 87 archdioceses/dioceses from 39 states. Results are here.

Compliance February 26, 2015

GAO Finds Lump-Sum Information Materials Deficient

The GAO recommends that the Department of Labor require defined benefit plan sponsors to notify the agency when they offer lump-sum payment windows.
Reported by

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) says it reviewed 11 packets of informational materials provided by defined benefit (DB) plan sponsors offering lump sums to as many as 248,000 participants, finding that all lacked at least some key information needed to make an informed decision or were otherwise unclear.

GAO identified eight key types of information that participants need to have a sound understanding of a lump-sum offer. While GAO did not review the packets for compliance or legal adequacy, most packets provided a substantial amount of this key information.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

However, the relative value notices were often unclear about how the value of the lump sum compared to the value of the lifetime monthly benefit provided by the plan. Similarly, many packets did not clearly indicate the interest rate or mortality assumptions used, limiting participants’ ability to assess how the lump-sum payment was calculated.

In addition, according to GAO, few of the packets informed participants about the benefit protections they would keep by staying in their employer’s plan—full or partial protections provided by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation if the plan sponsor defaults. GAO says this omission is notable because many participants it interviewed cited fear of sponsor default as an important factor in choosing the lump sum.

GAO noted that participants potentially face a reduction in their retirement assets when they accept a lump-sum offer. The amount of the lump-sum payment may be less than what it would cost in the retail market to replace the plan’s benefit because the mortality and interest rates used by retail market insurers are different from the rates used by sponsors, particularly when calculating lump sums for younger participants and women. In addition, participants who take a lump-sum payment face potential investment challenges, and some may not continue to save their assets for retirement but instead spend some or all of the lump sum.

The GAO recommends that the Department of Labor (DOL) improve oversight by requiring DB plan sponsors to notify the agency when they implement lump-sum windows, and coordinate with Treasury to clarify guidance about the information plan sponsors provide to participants. In addition, GAO suggested the Department of Treasury should reassess regulations governing relative value statements, as well as the interest rates and mortality tables used in calculating lump sums.

The full GAO report may be downloaded from here.

«