Retirement-Age Households Show a ‘Chunk or Nothing’ Withdrawal Pattern

Observing drawdown patterns can inform plan sponsors about how to design their plans to facilitate withdrawals and about what guidance participants need.

As the large Baby Boomer generation nears and enters retirement, more retirement plan sponsors have been thinking about how they can facilitate the drawdown phase for participants.

The retirement income market—defined as assets controlled by households age 65-plus with $100,000 to less than $5 million who take 4% or more of personal assets as income—is currently 8% of U.S. household assets, up from 4% of assets in 2006. Based on incidence of pensions and behaviors of retirees, regardless of pension status, data and consulting firm Hearts & Wallets estimates this market will grow to encompass 11% to 12% of assets in 2029.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Observing drawdown patterns can inform plan sponsors about how to design their plans to facilitate withdrawals and can inform sponsors and advisers about what guidance participants need. Defined contribution (DC) plan participants are unlikely to feel confident about retiring when they receive no retirement income projections and no help defining discretionary versus required expenses.

Consumer behavior shows a consistent “chunk or nothing” pattern in retirement, first identified by Hearts & Wallets in 2012, where nearly half (43%) of households age 65 and older draw either nothing (0% of assets) or chunks (8% or more of assets). Looking at 2013, 2015 and 2019, Hearts & Wallets found that more than one-third of households that make $100,000 to $250,000 took 0.0% to 0.9% of assets, while between 20% and 24% took 9% or more of assets as income. Approximately three in 10 households making between $250,000 and $500,000 took 0.0% to 0.9% of assets and between 13% and 20% took 9% or more. However, wealthier households—with $500,000 to less than $5 million in investable assets—do not follow the chunk or nothing pattern.

The once-espoused 4% rule has fallen out of favor, with some saying that is not an appropriate withdrawal amount for everyone depending on individual circumstances and some saying that with the forecasted lower return environment, 4% is just too much. Looking at 2013, 2015 and 2019, Hearts & Wallets data shows that among households age 65 and older with $100,000 to less than $5 million in investable assets, the majority withdrew less than 5% from their accounts—with the percentage of those doing so decreasing as the amount of investable assets increased.

Still, in 2019, 21% of households making $100,000 to $250,000 withdrew 4% or more as income. Twenty-eight percent of households making $250,000 up to $500,000 withdrew 4% or more.

However, Hearts & Wallets found the behavior of drawing 4% or more is cyclical with distress in the economy, as shown by a spike in 2008, which then reverted to the secular growth path. In 2006, among households age 65 and older with $100,000 to less than $5 million in investable assets, 20% withdrew 4% or more; this jumped to 48% in 2008. Since then, the number of households withdrawing 4% or more has hovered around one-third. Hearts & Wallets projects this will spike to 50% in 2021.

“Income-taking advice needs to be enhanced and include advice on which accounts to tap,” said Amber Katris, Hearts & Wallets subject matter expert and co-author of the report. “Not only is the retirement income market now substantial, but also many consumers need to generate cash during COVID-19. During times of reduced income, similar needs exist for retirement income and short-term cash, both of which involve sustaining spending. Households impacted by COVID-19 may also need solutions that include short-term debt.”

COVID-19 Compliance Corner: New Requirements and Options for Health/Cafeteria Plans

Each week, Carol Buckmann, with Cohen & Buckmann P.C., will explain legislative provisions or official guidance related to the COVID-19 pandemic that affect retirement and health plan sponsors.

Recent IRS, Department of Labor (DOL) and Health and Human Services (HHS) guidance has imposed new requirements for health and cafeteria plans, including flexible spending accounts (FSAs). Participants have extended time to make coverage elections, make COBRA payments and file benefit claims. Sponsors of cafeteria plans also have new options to provide additional relief to participants, including the ability to make additional mid-year elections to change coverage. These requirements and options require coordination with insurers and administrators and should be clearly communicated to employees.   

New Coronavirus-Related Requirements

Coverage. Group health plans, regardless of whether they are part of a cafeteria plan, are now required to cover coronavirus diagnosis and related treatment without applying cost sharing requirements. Similar coverage is required for telemedicine visits. The IRS has issued guidance providing that high deductible health plans (HDHPs) which work in tandem with HSAs may cover these services before the deductible has been met.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Extended Deadlines. Plans must ignore the period from March 1 to 60 days after the national emergency ends, called the “Outbreak Period,” in calculating deadlines. We don’t yet know the ending date of the Outbreak Period because the national emergency is still in effect. The clock begins to run again after the Outbreak Period ends. For example, a qualified beneficiary has 60 days following the COBRA notice to elect coverage. If a qualifying event such as a layoff occurred on March 31 and notice was sent on April 1, assuming the national emergency ended on June 30, the qualified beneficiary would have 60 days following June 30 in which to make the election. This extension also permits delays in notifying the plan that a qualifying event has occurred and paying COBRA premiums and extends the 30-day grace period for late payments that generally applies under COBRA.

Special COBRA Considerations.

Plan sponsors may delay sending out COBRA notices during the Outbreak Period under the same guidance, but it is advisable to send COBRA notices as soon as practicable together with an explanation of the new deadlines. The explanation is important because the DOL’s model COBRA notices do not explain the new coronavirus relief.

It is not clear how inquiries about coverage and claims that come in during the extended election period must be administered if no election has yet been made. Insurers and administrators should develop procedures to hold claims during this time so that retroactive payments may be made if coverage is elected. 

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Special Enrollment Periods.

Group health plans must permit employees to change their elections outside of the normal enrollment period if the employee has a change in individual or family status, including marriage, birth or adoption of a child and loss of health coverage by the employee, a spouse or dependent. Under the extension rules, the usual 30- or 60-day enrollment period will be extended during the Outbreak Period. However, if an election is made, coverage is not required to be retroactive except in the case of birth, adoption or placement for adoption. It is not clear how the retroactive coverage must be administered.

Optional Provisions for Cafeteria Plans.

Many FSAs allow mid-year changes to cafeteria plan elections for the HIPAA change in status events discussed above, and for reasons permitted in IRS regulations. These permitted mid-year changes are exceptions to the requirement that cafeteria plan elections must be in effect for the entire year. Recognizing the fact that current circumstances, such as closures of day care centers and cancellations of summer camp or elective surgery, may have made prior elections inappropriate, the IRS relief also permits, but does not require, cafeteria plan sponsors to allow prospective mid-year elections during 2020 to:

  • enroll in employer-sponsored health coverage if the employee initially declined;
  • change an existing election for health coverage to enroll in different health coverage sponsored by the same employer (including changing enrollment from self-only coverage to family coverage);
  • revoke an existing election for employer-sponsored health coverage, if the employee attests in writing that the employer’s coverage will be replaced by other health coverage not sponsored by the employer (for example, a spouse’s employer’s plan) and the employer does not have actual knowledge to the contrary;
  • revoke an election, make a new election, or change an existing election regarding a health FSA; and
  • revoke an election, make a new election, or change an existing election regarding a dependent care FSA.

However, a plan sponsor may provide that elections may not be reduced below expenses already incurred or impose other limits to avoid adverse selection.

Optional Extension of Time to Prevent Forfeitures.

Cafeteria plans are subject to a “use it or lose it” rule under which unused amounts must be forfeited at the end of the year. One exception to this rule is that health FSAs and dependent care FSAs may have a “grace period” after the end of the year (up to March 15 for calendar year plans) under which claims incurred after the end of the year may be applied to the prior year’s elected limit. Plans are permitted to have extended grace periods up to December 31 under the IRS relief. Health FSAs may use this extension even if they permit limited carryovers of unused elected amounts.

Claims and Appeals.

The Outbreak Period must be disregarded in determining whether the following participant actions under a plan’s claims procedures are timely:

  • Filing initial benefit claims;
  • Appeals of adverse benefit determinations;
  • Filing for Affordable Care Act (ACA) external review under the federal process; and
  • Perfecting a request for ACA external review under the federal process.

Action Steps for Plan Sponsors.

Plan sponsors need to make sure that their plan administration providers are able to comply with the new HIPAA and COBRA election deadlines and administer any optional provisions that the plan sponsor wants to implement. They should ask insurers how claims will be handled during extended election periods.

Plan sponsors should also be aware that required amendments to reflect changes to their cafeteria plans are not required now but must be made by December 31. Finally, all plan sponsors should be on the alert for an announcement- that the national emergency has ended and for further guidance.

 

Carol Buckmann is a co-founding partner of Cohen & Buckmann P.C. As a highly regarded employee benefits and ERISA [Employee Retirement Income Security Act] attorney, Buckmann deals with the foremost issues in ERISA, including pension plan compliance, fiduciary responsibilities and investment fund formation.

She has 40 years of practice in this area of the law and a depth of experience on complex pension law and fiduciary problems. She regularly shares her thoughts on new developments in the benefits industry on Insights, Cohen & Buckmann’s blog, and writes and speaks on ERISA topics. Buckmann has been recognized by Martindale-Hubbell as an AV Pre-eminent Rated Lawyer, was selected for inclusion in the Best Lawyers in America and was named one of the Super Lawyers in Employee Benefits.

This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal or tax advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice. Any opinions of the author do not necessarily reflect the stance of Institutional Shareholder Services or its affiliates.

«