It’s Back to Basics for Benefits Priorities

Prior to the pandemic, ultra-low unemployment put a spotlight on ‘lifestyle benefits’ for employees. The COVID-19 downturn has already shifted the focus of many plan sponsors.

Because the unemployment rate was roughly 3.3% before the advent of the coronavirus outbreak, employers were broadly focused on offering generous benefits, including what are known as “lifestyle benefits.”

Lifestyle benefits include everything from gym memberships to reimbursements for pet sitting, says Brian Colburn, senior vice president of corporate development strategy at Alegeus.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

“In such a competitive market for talent, most employers were not wanting to rock the boat on health or other benefits,” he says. “They were keeping reasonably rich plans, including lifestyle accounts.”

When COVID-19 came on the scene, things changed completely overnight, Colburn says.

“Labor market changes usually take a year or two to occur,” he adds. “With COVID, things changed in a matter of weeks. Employers looked to keep services that generate the most value for employees at a lower cost. This meant cutting back on some ancillary benefits.”

Employers now are focused on the possibility of offering high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) paired with health savings accounts (HSAs), Colburn says. “That is the biggest thing we have seen from our end of the market.”

Scaling back on company matches to 401(k) plans and contributions to profit sharing accounts are two other areas where employers are trying to save money, says Lisa Loesel, an employee benefits partner with McDermott Will & Emery.

“Depending on what kind of plan they have and the terms set forth for them, we have seen plan sponsors delay the timing of their contributions, change the amount, move from a fixed to a discretionary amount or even cut their contributions indefinitely,” Loesel says.

Among sponsors offering a pension plan, more are de-risking their plans.

“The market happens to be favorable for doing this right now,” she says.

Various companies are also offering their employees voluntary early retirement, says Kathy Barber, vice president of benefits and compensation at Ayco. To avoid having to lay off employees or furlough them, some employers are cutting executive workers’ salaries, and this is happening at a higher rate than in prior down markets, Barber says.

Barber also expects that more employers will look to freeze their pensions, following the onslaught of the pandemic.

“I expect to see some companies looking to terminate their pension benefits and get them off the books by transferring the risk to an insurance company,” Barber says.

One area where sponsors seem to be bucking the trend of cutting back, Loesel says, is by offering more financial wellness and education resources. In fact, an AllianceBernstein survey of plan sponsors and participants, conducted before the pandemic occurred, found that financial wellness programs were an area of keen interest. Sixty-five percent of sponsors offer a financial wellness program, up from 43% two years ago, says Jennifer DeLong, senior vice president, managing director and head of defined contribution (DC) for the Americas at AllianceBernstein. The median participation rate in these programs by participants is 50%, up from 30% a year ago.

“While those are very big jumps, they are not surprising, given the fact that the types of financial wellness programs that employers have been offering in recent years have continued to increase,” DeLong says. “Many of the larger companies have been offering these programs to attract and retain employees. There has been increasing interest in holistic financial wellness and retirement readiness, to improve workers’ overall financial lives.”

While Loesel says her clients are increasing their financial wellness offerings, DeLong says the economic uncertainty that the pandemic has created for companies may, in the long run, put these programs at risk. Companies may have to weigh offering a financial wellness program with offering a 401(k) match, she says.

Regardless of the fate of financial wellness programs, Barber says she hopes that employers help employees who have taken advantage of a coronavirus-related distribution (CRD) from their retirement plan.

“Many companies have been surprised by the number of employees who have taken a CRD,” Loesel says. “They should make sure that employees who took coronavirus-related distributions know that they have the opportunity to repay those distributions over three years. They could also move to a stretch match to encourage higher deferral rates. There needs to be a refocus on saving when finances allow.”

How Times of Turbulence Can Show What Your Plan Is Really Made Of

Ben Lewis, with TIAA, discusses why it may be a good time for plan sponsors to review their plans and how to do so.

As employers manage increased financial pressures and uncertainty, ensuring the financial well-being of their employees remains a top priority. Retirement plan design is a critical way for employers to improve employee financial well-being, and it’s important for plan sponsors to evaluate their plans to make sure they are meeting their objectives during these difficult times.

It may not feel like an ideal time for plan sponsors to review their retirement plan offerings; however, market stress and current economic hardships may uncover plan design shortfalls, gaps or opportunities. Taking time now to revisit and re-evaluate plan design and its impact on retirement plan health can support employees’ financial well-being and retirement security in this age of uncertainty.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Setting Plan Goals

Setting the right goals and aligning retirement plans with the most important objective—helping employees generate monthly retirement income they can’t outlive—is critical to preparing employees for a secure retirement. In fact, according to a study conducted by TIAA, 53% of plan sponsors reported that helping employees retire on time and maintain their standard of living was a primary objective of their plan. Ensuring employees can replace their income when they stop working begins with plan design, but also extends to employee engagement through education, advice, digital tools and effective communications programs that reach all employees.

With lifetime income as the primary objective, plan sponsors can look at a variety of metrics and plan data to understand how well their plan is performing. An employer’s retirement provider, consultant or adviser can help with evaluating the plan to determine its health.

Optimizing Retirement Plan Design and Outcomes

Employers can gauge their retirement plan’s overall retirement readiness through the plan’s income replacement ratio—a measure of how much pre-retirement income individuals are expected to replace in retirement. With that as a starting point, plan sponsors can then evaluate how plan design and other plan elements are aligned to improve employees’ financial well-being and, ultimately, lifetime income at retirement.

The following are some key steps to help determine if a retirement plan is performing in line with plan objectives during the current economic downturn.

Understand plan health: As mentioned earlier, a plan’s retirement readiness is a great starting point, but it’s important to dig deeper to evaluate how different employee segments are doing. A deeper plan analysis could include looking at employees based on age, gender, changes in contribution behavior or other criteria. For example, some employees may have reduced or stopped their plan contributions due to financial hardship or to build up their emergency savings. Understanding employees’ unique financial situations and retirement readiness provides opportunities for employers to help them now or re-engage with them once the crisis subsides.

Examine the default investment option: In many plans, default investment options are capturing the majority of new contributions, highlighting the importance of selecting an appropriate and effective default option. Some important considerations include not only how the default performed at the plan level during this time period, but also how it performed for employees at different lifestages. With so many participants remaining in the plan after retirement, it’s also important to consider if the default is meeting the needs of retired employees and providing them with monthly income for life. The passage of the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act has made it easier to include guaranteed options in a retirement plan, and embedding a fixed annuity in a default option can benefit both employees saving for and living in retirement.

Evaluate investment offerings: Remember that an investment menu should offer a diversified portfolio for growth and guaranteed lifetime income to ensure all employees are retirement ready. Recent market volatility may help identify any gaps, overlap or underperformance by asset classes. Plan sponsors may find gaps in conservative investment options such as stable value or fixed annuities or growing demand for sustainable or impact investment options. Plan sponsors should carefully document their analysis and take appropriate action, whether that means taking no action or replacing, adding or removing an investment option.

Revisit education, advice and communications programs: Understanding employees’ retirement readiness levels can help plan sponsors create tailored education and communications programs. Employees that have taken coronavirus-related distributions (CRDs) or loans may need extra help getting back on track financially. And some employee segments may benefit from education about the benefits of diversification. There could also be Baby Boomers approaching retirement without a lifetime income plan or guaranteed income allocations. Knowing who needs help allows plan sponsors to offer employees the support they need through education, objective advice and the many digital tools and resources available to them.

Taking Action

Implementing effective plan design solutions to better prepare employees for lifetime income should also take into consideration the financial challenges facing employers. Raising employer matches or implementing automatic escalation features have helped raise employee total savings rates, but these approaches may not be realistic or feasible at this point in time.

Employers can model the effects of plan design changes under consideration to understand the costs and expected benefits. This approach can help employers evaluate potential changes and create a road map for short- and long-term plan adjustments.

Today, 50% of households are “at risk” of not having enough to maintain their living standards in retirement, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, and that percentage is likely to increase as participants navigate the financial effects of the coronavirus. Taking time now to re-evaluate plan performance and optimize plan effectiveness is not only an important part of a plan sponsors’ fiduciary obligation, but also puts participants in the best position to be able to meet their retirement savings goals, even in times of uncertainty.

 

Ben Lewis is senior managing director and head of institutional sales at TIAA Individual & Institutional Services LLC. Lewis has dedicated himself to helping Americans understand why they should save for retirement—and how they can save.

This material is for informational or educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). This material does not take into account any specific objectives or circumstances of any particular investor, or suggest any specific course of action. Investment decisions should be made based on the investor’s own objectives and circumstances.

This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal or tax advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice. Any opinions of the author do not necessarily reflect the stance of Institutional Shareholder Services or its affiliates.

 

Guarantees are subject to the claims-paying ability of the issuing company.

Investment, insurance and annuity products are not FDIC insured, are not bank guaranteed, are not bank deposits, are not insured by any federal government agency, are not a condition to any banking service or activity and may lose value.

TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, LLC, Member FINRA, distributes securities products.

©2020 Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America-College Retirement Equities Fund, 730 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017

1205186

«