Grouping Benefits to Enhance Financial Wellness

Instead of giving employees a list of benefit products, plan sponsors should consider presenting them as resources for different life stages, which can lead to better participation.

Packaging a group of benefits and using one communication strategy for an entire workforce can be arduous and generic. A MetLife study suggests that, instead, employers should organize a suite of tools designed to navigate an employee’s financial well-being at every stage of their lives.

As workforces diversify and face greater challenges, employers are tasked with offering benefits that support financial, physical, mental and social health, all while providing employees with what they want: more options, according to a research report from MetLife’s 19th Annual U.S. Employee Benefit Trends Study (EBTS).

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

To take on a more targeted approach, employers need to come up with a strategy. “As a first step, employers should consider their approach to communications and make sure that it is not ‘one and done’ during open enrollment each year,” says Missy Plohr-Memming, senior vice president of group benefits at MetLife. Plohr-Memming points to research from MetLife’s 2021 EBTS study that found nearly seven in 10 employees wanted to hear from business leaders about their benefits after they had already signed up for them.

Next, she says, plan sponsors should develop a communications plan that speaks to any distinctive needs. One way to do this is by promoting value-added features of benefits that coincide with different major life events.

“For example, employers can highlight how benefits for the birth of a child can be relevant to improving an employee’s financial wellness,” Plohr-Memming says. “Sharing real-life stories of how benefits work together to support employees is a personalized and effective approach to drive engagement and enrollment in benefits.”

Alok Deshpande, CEO of SmartPath, says sponsors face challenges when communicating about their benefits, and many employees do not view their employer as a source of financial wellness help.

“As employers think about their communication strategy, the first step is for them to let employees know that they can use their employers as a resource,” he explains. “Employers should be able to provide some format of tools and support that they couldn’t get on their own.”

Plan sponsors can provide benefits to participants beyond medical insurance and a retirement plan, he adds. For example, offering calculators and decision-support tools allow employees to answer their own questions while helping them decide what steps to take.

Increasing engagement with such benefits and products can also lead to other perks for employees. As an example, Deshpande says employers can use their buying power to drive discounts on interest rates for homeowners who do not hold a high enough credit score to receive a loan at a reasonable rate. “You’re starting to see people lean into that, and I think early wage access for certain loans have been the winners of providing real, tangible benefits to those that might not be able to get it outside,” he says.

Offering benefits for all stages of life includes retirement, too. MetLife’s study found 48% of employees cited their ability to retire as a top source of financial stress and anxiety. To improve employee well-being and keep them on track for retirement, employers should build a comprehensive benefits package that offers a solid retirement plan—including implementing automatic enrollment and a company match—as well as supports employees’ short-term and long-term financial health, Plohr-Memming says.

Deshpande says a focus on retirement can vary in different life stages. For example, younger workers at the start of their careers might focus on building an emergency savings account or paying off student loan debt. Offering a full match and an investment lineup allows these employees to contribute more without adding to their financial stress. “Getting 100% of the match and making investment selections are the most important steps people can make earlier on,” he says.

Even if employees forego certain benefits, communicating with different demographics ensures each employee is informed and understands how benefits can impact their financial wellness, Plohr-Memming explains.

“By offering comprehensive financial wellness programs for employees at all life stages—and communicating the value of those benefits effectively through regular emails, workshops and more—employers can ensure that their employees are thinking critically about their financial futures when the time comes to make benefits elections,” she says.

House Committee Expected to Advance ‘SECURE Act 2.0’

Commenting on the expected legislative action, sources agree the stakes remain high when it comes to addressing the U.S. retirement security gap.

The House Ways and Means Committee has scheduled a markup session for 11 a.m. EST, May 5—i.e., tomorrow—focused on advancing the “Securing a Strong Retirement Act.”

A markup session is where a committee formally considers a bill and debates amendments, should any be put forward by committee members. Typically, such sessions conclude with a vote on a final version of a bill for full House floor consideration, though other outcomes are possible that would potentially pause or slow the bill’s progress. Should the committee advance the bill by majority vote, it is possible the full House could vote on the legislation in the coming weeks or months.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Retirement industry observers have taken to referring to the ambitious Securing a Strong Retirement Act as the “SECURE Act 2.0,” because it would build in various important ways on the success of the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act. This legislation, passed into law late in 2019, delivered a host of popular retirement-focused reforms, including the establishment of a new marketplace for pooled employer plans (PEPs) and the creation of a framework for delivering portable in-plan lifetime income investments.

Among the follow-up legislation’s most popular features are a provision to increase the qualified plan required minimum distribution (RMD) age to 75, the elimination of barriers to even broader use of lifetime income products, the expansion of retirement savings opportunities for nonprofit organization employees, and the creation of greater clarity regarding startups’ tax credits that incentivize small businesses to join multiple employer plans (MEPs) and PEPs.

Commenting on the pending legislative action, Wayne Chopus, president and CEO of the Insured Retirement Institute (IRI), said the stakes remain high when it comes to addressing the U.S. retirement security gap. While the SECURE Act represented a great advancement, he says, much more can be done to help lower- and middle-income Americans pursue greater financial stability.

“The enactment of the SECURE Act in late 2019 was a big step forward for workers, retirees and their families,” Chopus tells PLANSPONSOR. “It has put them on a path toward relieving some of the anxiety they feel about their future retirement security. However, we also know there is still much more that needs to be done to build their economic equity, strengthen their financial security, and protect their income in a way that can sustain them throughout their retirement years.”

In a recent conversation with PLANSPONSOR, Catherine Reilly, Smart USA’s director of U.S. retirement solutions, said the firm’s hopes remain high that the SECURE Act 2.0 could become law this year. Reilly noted that her background as a self-described “policy wonk,” having earned a master’s degree in public administration from the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, has certainly come in handy as she worked to help Smart transition its PEP business from the U.K. to the U.S. Echoing comments from other industry professionals, Reilly said the new bill could significantly accelerate the progress being made in closing the coverage gap.

“SECURE 2.0 doesn’t have a retirement plan mandate per se, but it would require employers that already offer a plan to implement automatic enrollment for most employees, which would be a good start toward addressing the coverage gap overall,” Reilly said. “Unfortunately, even SECURE 2.0 is not a full solution for all sectors, for example gig workers. It may help in that it does reduce the service requirements for long-term part-time workers, but that’s not exactly the same group of people.”

Chopus says the insurance industry is hopeful that the SECURE Act 2.0 might permit plans to use qualified longevity annuity contracts (QLACs) as a component of their qualified default investment alternative (QDIA). The sources agree this would be a powerful step toward driving wider acceptance and usage of in-plan annuities.

The full text of the Securing a Strong Retirement Act, as introduced, is available here.

Among the many other provisions detailed across some 140 pages of text, the legislation proposes expanding auto-enrollment in retirement plans, simplifying and increasing the saver’s credit, enhancing 403(b) plans, and indexing the individual retirement account (IRA) catch-up limit. Other sections address the treatment of student loan payments as elective deferrals for purposes of retirement plan matching contributions and describe a new military spouse retirement plan eligibility credit for small employers.

«