Satisfying Electronic Disclosure Requirements for SPDs to New Hires

Experts from Groom Law Group and CAPTRUST answer questions concerning retirement plan administration and regulations.

In the past, we have been providing a hard copy summary plan description (SPD) to all our new employees in their new hire packet as part of our onboarding process; however, we are looking to reduce the amount of paper we send to employees. We are thinking of including a notice in the new hire packet, that provides a link to a website where the SPD can be electronically accessed by participants. Would this be compliant with the Department of Labor’s (DOL) regulations regarding electronic disclosure with respect to new hires?”

Charles Filips, Kimberly Boberg, David Levine and David Powell, with Groom Law Group, and Michael A. Webb, senior financial adviser at CAPTRUST, answer:

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

As you know, the administrator of a benefit plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) must provide certain disclosures and documents to participants and other specified individuals at stated times or when certain events occur.  When providing these documents, the administrator must “use measures reasonably calculated to ensure actual receipt of the material by plan participants.”  In 2002, the DOL provided two safe harbors that would permit an administrator to electronically furnish documents and still be deemed to satisfy ERISA’s disclosure requirements. The DOL’s 2020 final rule on electronic disclosures created a new electronic delivery safe harbor that provides significantly more flexibility in this area. 

The DOL appears to anticipate the scenario you describe in its discussion of providing a paper initial notice of internet availability to plan participants as follows:

“This initial notice must explain that covered documents will be provided electronically to an electronic address, identify the specific electronic address to be used for the individual, include any instructions to access the documents, include a notice that materials may not be available for more than a year or, if later, after the posted document has been superseded by a subsequent version of the document, and an explanation of the rights to request a paper version of any document and the right to opt out of electronic delivery globally. This paper notice is required both before a plan fiduciary begins to rely on the safe harbor (after its effective date), and when employees are newly hired over time.”

Note the slight, yet significant, difference, however, in what the DOL is describing compared to what you are describing. Whereas your notice provides a link to access the SPD, what this language is stating is that you need to first provide a notice, on paper, that the participant will be emailed/texted at a specific specified email address/smartphone number with the information necessary to access the website where the SPD will be posted. After that you would then email/text the notice (described as a “notice of internet availability” in the final rule) that is similar to what you proposed be included in your new hire packet.

Thus, your process, as outlined, would not be compliant with the language in the final rule. However, as noted, this is a safe harbor, which means that it is not the only method of satisfying the ERISA’s disclosure requirements electronically, though an administrator who complies with any of the DOL’s electronic disclosure safe harbors will be deemed to have satisfied those disclosure requirements. Thus, before you abandon your proposed process, you may wish to contact ERISA counsel well-versed in such matters to determine whether your proposed method might satisfy ERISA disclosure requirements or could be tweaked to be compliant.

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.

Do YOU have a question for the Experts? If so, we would love to hear from you! Simply forward your question to Rebecca.Moore@issgovernance.com with Subject: Ask the Experts, and the Experts will do their best to answer your question in a future Ask the Experts column.

CITs, Retirement Income Products and ESG Investing Poised for Growth

Asset managers polled by Cerulli Associates reported trends they see for DC plan investments.

As registered investment adviser (RIA) aggregator firms continue to acquire smaller players in the defined contribution (DC) space, investment managers are starting to take notice of their growing influence in deciding DC plan investments, a recent study suggests. There has been a shift in distribution dynamics as many RIA firms look to centralize their investment analysis and research.

According to Cerulli’s “U.S. Defined Contribution Distribution 2021: Uncovering Investment-Only Distribution Opportunities” report, many aggregator firms have taken an institutional approach to their investment decisionmaking process, centralizing the due diligence and investment analysis at the home-office level. By doing so, they have taken much of the investment research and analysis responsibilities out of the hands of the firm’s field advisers, enabling them to spend more time helping plan sponsors with their plan design, participant education and communications, and recordkeeper oversight.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

In addition to centralizing the investment research function, some RIA aggregator firms are leveraging their scale and investment expertise to create their own 3(38) investment manager open-architecture, white-label investment products and solutions. The report notes that 66% of managers believe aggregators have become a primary influencer in deciding DC plan investments in the $25 million to $250 million segment, and that rises to 68% for the $250 million to $500 million range.

“Managers that understand the investment decisionmaking process, adviser concerns and potential platform changes on the horizon will be well-poised to capture plan assets controlled by RIA aggregators,” says senior analyst Shawn O’Brien.

CITs Poised for Growth

Key DC plan decisionmakers, including advisers and consultants, continue to favor collective investment trusts (CITs) due, in large part, to their relatively low-cost structure and pricing flexibly, the Cerulli report notes. The firm recommends that target-date managers strongly consider CITs for their future target-date series launches.

The vast majority (92%) of managers currently offer a target-date series in a CIT, and 2021 has seen the use of CITs grow in place of other, traditional funds as the retirement vehicle of choice. Nearly all (97%) CIT providers cite lower costs as a very important factor when developing their CIT products. Other factors considered in development and distribution of CITs that managers found very important include having an additional vehicle offering for the existing investment strategy (78%), the ability to negotiate fees (72%), the ease of distribution (47%) and the speed of product development (38%).

In recent years, many CIT providers have lowered their investment minimums and, in certain cases, waived them altogether. Cerulli’s report finds that those with low or no investment minimums are more tenable investment options for smaller plans and advisers and could help promote stronger adoption down market.

Retirement Income

Retirement income remains a prime area of focus for asset managers and plan fiduciaries, as industry experts note there is no “one-size-fits-all” retirement income product or solution. Asset managers believe target-date funds (TDFs) with a retirement income vintage are most likely to capture the greatest new flows for in-plan options (38%), followed by a dynamic product (22%). Dynamic qualified default investment alternatives (QDIAs) that start participants off in an accumulation-focused vehicle—e.g., TDFs—before automatically transitioning them into a managed account offer participants the benefits of personalization as they approach their retirement years.

Slightly less than a quarter (21%) of target-date managers offer a target-date series with a guaranteed income component. Providers note that some plan sponsors are beginning to adopt TDFs with a guaranteed income component, but adoption is still far from widespread, Cerulli says.

Most defined contribution investment-only (DCIO) asset managers (63%) indicate that greater interest in retirement tiers will have a positive impact on their business. Plan sponsors looking to implement retirement tiers are likely to exhibit an interest in helping their retired employees navigate the retirement phase of their lives and may look to offer a suite of customized and off-the-shelf retiree-focused investments.

ESG Investing

A shift in political attitude has placed environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing back in the spotlight, Cerulli notes. Further guidance from the Department of Labor (DOL) may help plan sponsors and their fiduciary partners navigate their decisionmaking process as they implement ESG investment products.

Cerulli found that 65% of retirement specialist advisers believe ESG products will gain broader adoption in the DC market in the coming years, and 67% of asset managers believe interest in ESG investing will have a positive impact on their DCIO business, up 20% from last year. Despite a proliferation of ESG investment products, DC plan fiduciaries have historically been hesitant to offer ESG-branded investment products.

Several TDF managers indicate they plan to incorporate ESG principles into their investment process moving forward. The Cerulli report notes that many DC-focused asset managers run ESG screens on their investment products and third-party subadvisers regardless of whether their investment product is ESG-branded.

Retirement specialist advisers, on average, expect to add an ESG investment option to the plan menu for nearly one-quarter (22%) of their DC plan clients. The new, softer DOL stance on including ESG investments in plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) will likely help ease barriers to adoption within the ERISA-covered DC space, Cerulli notes.

«