Employers Use SDBAs to Give Employees Choice

Self-directed brokerage accounts can also help keep participants in the plan and be an avenue for offering not-so-standard investment options, but they’re not right for every plan.

This summer, the federal Thrift Savings Plan will allow participants to allocate some of their assets to a self-directed brokerage account, or SDBA, becoming the latest large employer plan to incorporate an SDBA into its offerings.

SDBAs allow plan sponsors to keep their menu streamlined, while also alleviating specific investment demands from some participants. About half of large plans now offer SDBAs to plan participants, a share that has inched up slowly over a couple of decades, although less than 3% of participants in a given plan make use of the brokerage window, according to Alight.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

These accounts have historically been found mostly in plans of professional services firms, such as doctors or law practices, where a small but important segment of an employee population wanted access to more sophisticated and diverse investment options than were available in the core menu.

Growth in SDBAs in recent years, however, has also come from plan sponsors looking for ways to offer certain types of investments that some participants might be asking for, such as environmental, social, and governance options, or faith-based investments. “Self-directed brokerage accounts seem to come up more now as a way to solve for more diversified needs that weren’t coming up five years ago,” says Jennifer Doss, director of institutional solutions for CAPTRUST in Raleigh, North Carolina.

SDBAs are also an option that some plan sponsors use to keep retirees or those who have separated from the company from taking their assets with them. “Plan sponsors would rather these folks stay in the plan now,” says Michael Kreps, a principal at Groom and the co-chair of the firm’s Retirement Services Practice Group. “They work really hard to get the fees down and to make the plan work for more people, so they want to limit the outflow. Participants can always come out of the investment window, but once they’re out of the plan, they can’t come back.”

Another factor that drives interest in SDBAs is a recent merger or acquisition, in which two companies have to merge vastly different fund lineups in their retirement plan. “In those cases, a brokerage window is a fairly palatable add to the lineup, so that participants who lost their favorite fund can go there and find that fund,” says Greg Ungerman, senior vice president and defined contribution practice leader at Callan. “That’s with the caveat that in a brokerage window, they tend not to be institutional shares, and there are no collective investment trusts, so it’s retail pricing.”

Not for Everyone

While SDBAs make sense for some plan sponsors, they’re not necessarily right for every plan, says Allie Rivera, vice president of investment and retirement services for OneDigital Retirement + Wealth. “If not having a brokerage window is creating a barrier for employees who won’t participate because of their religious beliefs, then offering a brokerage window is a solution,” Rivera says. “But on the flip side, if you have a diversified investment lineup and your participant base is satisfied, and you have high participation rates, then this might not make sense.”

In addition, SDBA fees have fallen in recent years, allowing more employers to consider whether they’re a viable option for their plan. Still, SDBAs are about three times more popular in the largest plans (those with more than 5,000 participants), at 44%, than in the smallest (fewer than 50 participants), at 15%, according to data from the Plan Sponsor Council of America.

“SDBAs have become a very low-cost tool that a lot of participants use in a meaningful way to help them achieve their goals,” says Nathan Voris, director, investments, insights and consultant services at Schwab Retirement Plan Services in Richfield, Ohio.

A Charles Schwab report found that at the end of last year, the average participant balance in an SDBA was about $353,000, up 6.4% over the previous year. That balance was significantly higher at $558,470 for advised accounts, than for non-advised accounts ($304,164). “The self-directed brokerage account is a great tool for a 401(k) participant who has an adviser who can provide direction on using it and make that part of their overarching strategy,” Voris says.

For now, most plan sponsors aren’t making advisers available specifically for the brokerage window. They either have just the standard advice component that they offer to every plan participant or participants using SDBAs are conferring with their outside advisers.

To Limit or Not to Limit Investment Options

Advisers say the best structure of an SDBA will depend on its size, the objectives of the plan, and the needs of participants. If a plan sponsor does offer an SDBA, all participants must have access to it. Voris says some plan sponsors do a proactive survey of plan participants before introducing an SDBA to gauge interest and get a sense of whether it’s a feature that participants would use.

Six in 10 plans don’t put any limitations on the investment options within the SDBA, while 31% limit investments to mutual funds only and 9% limit to only mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, according to Alight. Another restriction that some sponsors impose is not allowing participants to purchase the retail-priced shares in a mutual fund that the plan offers at a lower price, Ungerman says.

Among the participant assets in SDBA plans, equities remain the most popular asset, comprising 37% of holdings. Mutual funds were the second-largest holding, at 30%, followed by ETFs at 21% and cash at 11%, according to Schwab. Just 1% of investments in SDBA were in fixed income at the end of 2021.

Beyond limiting investments to funds only, Doss says best practice is not to place too many limitations on the accounts, since too many restrictions cross the line for making the account into a designated investment option.

“Most practitioners take the position that the employer has fiduciary responsibility to select the investments available under the plan,” Kreps says. “But with respect to [a brokerage] window, the employer as a fiduciary has only the responsibility to prudently select the provider of the brokerage window, but not the underlying investment.”

Choosing a Provider

Voris says plan sponsors introducing an SDBA now should look for an experienced provider that can walk them through the process and help them communicate it to participants. “It’s a pretty well-worn path,” he adds. “It’s not the Wild West. There are tools and resources that can help an engaged participant build a diversified portfolio.”

Like other elements of a 401(k) plan, sponsors need to follow a diligent process when introducing the SDBA. “You just want to make sure that you are thinking about it during the recordkeeper selection process, and make sure that you understand the fees and how it’s going to be communicated to participants,” Doss says.

Fee compression and growing awareness of diverse participant base needs may continue to drive interest in SDBAs.

Strategies to Simplify DC Plan Investment Menus

Plan sponsors can use a layering approach and white labeling to help defined contribution plan participants select investments.

Retirement plan sponsors can help participants with investment decisions by ditching duplicate funds, simplifying their choices through layering, and white labeling investments. 

While many participants are defaulted into target-date funds—the most prevalent industry-wide qualified default investment alternative, or QDIA—TDFs are also a simple choice for those who select investments on their own and want diversification. However, there is still a cohort of participants who prefer to choose their own asset allocation mix.  

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“A simple, yet effective way of simplifying the investment choices is for a plan sponsor to ensure that it’s offering enough investments to allow the participants to diversify and have different selections across different categories,” says Adam Rivett, consultant at OneDigital Retirement + Wealth.

An industry-accepted, well-known investment advisory and fund researcher’s “Style Box” description is useful to cull the investment menu, he says. “To not overwhelm them with paralysis of analysis by giving them too many choices, a best way to do that is not to have overlapping funds in the same style box,” Rivett says.  

Investment Layers  

A method for plan sponsors to arrange investments on a defined contribution plan investment menu is through layers of sophistication to account for complexity, explains Steve Vernon, a consulting research scholar at the Stanford Center on Longevity.

The first layer is an asset allocation fund, such as a TDF. From there, the plan sponsor should include three to six investment options for participants who want to allocate on their own. The final layer is a brokerage window where participants can select from any mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, and individual stocks and bonds, says Vernon. “That provides really sophisticated investors with flexibility,” he says.

An additional benefit of layering is that it could target personalized asset allocations and risk tolerance for participants by accounting for outside assets they have, Vernon adds. “Some participants have their investments spread among other IRAs [individual retirement accounts], and their spouse might have savings accounts, and they may have more specialized needs,” says Vernon.

A maximized asset allocation strategy could be to invest based on the total assets a participant has across different accounts. “This layering approach lets people have a one-size-fits-all fund which would be target-date fund, or a mix your own assets depending on their overall savings situation,” Vernon says.

Among the three to six investment options to allow for diversification without more complexity, plan sponsors could include a broad-based stock fund, a broad fixed income fund, and a stable value or money market fund for principal protection, says Vernon. 

Plan sponsors can also offer within the investment menu or within a brokerage window access to stocks or bonds that hedge against inflation or provide investments uncorrelated to traditional stocks. These could include Treasury inflation protection securities, or TIPS, real estate funds, and real estate investment trusts, sources say.

White Labeling

Another option for DC retirement plan sponsors to simplify investment menus is a white labeling approach. Plan sponsors could white label funds simply to take the provider’s name out of the fund name, or they can offer a single investment that uses a mix of underlying funds to offer participants multi-manager exposures to various assets. This second approach is also a way to ditch duplicate funds in the same style box. For example, a plan sponsor can offer a single option called the Large-Cap Equity Fund, but assets in the fund are directed to several underlying funds.

“[With white labeling], you have an investment adviser who’s actually taking care of the review of the funds, and you can have multiple managers there,” says Robyn Credico, defined contribution practice leader, North America, at Willis Towers Watson. “You can do a lot more interesting things that help the participant without confusing them.”

She warns, however, that white labeling can carry heavy costs. Access is often restricted to plans with assets of $500 million and above because of the cost of administration.

Rivett says white labeling has begun to move down-market through collective investment trusts. CITs, which are pooled, tax-exempt investment vehicles that commingle assets, and are administered by the bank or trust which acts as the trustee, can allow for more plan flexibility.

However, a plan sponsor turning to white labeling should have a good justification to do it because there are “plenty of low-cost index funds available,” in the market, Vernon suggests.

He says a plan sponsor might want to first exhaust those options and determine whether readily available low-cost index funds meet the needs of their employees. The plan sponsor also must have enough assets to make white labeling funds worthwhile.

“If they do have enough demand for a white label fund and they think that the current availability of low-cost index funds doesn’t meet participants needs then white labeling can be a good idea,” he says.

Communicating About the Investment Menu

After a plan sponsor has ensured that its investment menu offers quality, well-performing, diversified investments, it will want to ensure participants actually use the funds offered to them, says Rivett.  Plan sponsors should make sure participants understand the investment choices and how to use them.

Plan sponsors can’t just offer a fund, walk away, and let participants have at it. “As a fiduciary, I don’t want to take the risk of offering investments if nobody uses them,” says Credico.

«