Get more! Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.
PSCA Expresses Disagreement with Lifetime Income Proposal
While Edward Ferrigno, PSCA’s vice president, Washington Affairs, said the PSCA is “pleased that the DOL recognizes the importance of educating participants about this important issue,” the PSCA disagrees with the approach outlined in the DOL proposal.
The Council does not support a mandate for lifetime income illustrations, but rather directing participants to retirement income calculators instead. It is worried that the safe harbor in the intended regulation will result in a major reduction in the availability of other retirement income calculators, which will be to the detriment of participants.
In addition, the letter said:
- The DOL should elaborate on its authority to mandate such income illustrations;
- The DOL proposal should be product neutral, not singling out annuities but also offer other products, be they insured or non-insured ones;
- The DOL should specify that Field Assistance Bulletin 2006-03 applies to this intended illustrations rule. The bulletin in question provides that disclosures required under ERISA Section 105 may be provided by delivering a notice that the disclosure is available at a secure website and that a free written disclosure will be provided upon request; and
- While projections are critical to any lifetime income illustrations, such estimates need to consider future behavior.
“There are other ways for the DOL to encourage retirement savings,” said Ferrigno. “The PSCA recommends that the DOL maintain the practice of including retirement calculators on [their] website and make changes to highlight their existence on the site.” The letter also recommended that the DOL issue guidance that clarifies that such calculators take “future contributions and investment returns into account, and provide estimates that are expressed in current dollars,” as well as a disclaimer that such figures are estimates and not definitive.
“Any illustration should describe the assumptions on which it is based and should state that the illustration is merely an estimate,” added Ferrigno.
The letter can be downloaded from here.