Expanding on the Retirement Saver’s Credit

Awareness of the saver’s credit is low, and the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies suggests that employers design campaigns to promote it.

The saver’s credit, established by the Economic Growth and Tax Reconciliation Relief Act of 2001 and made permanent in the Pension Protection Act of 2006, has enjoyed success, but it could be even more successful with ongoing promotion and the implementation of policy reforms for its expansion, suggests a new study.

In its 22nd Annual Transamerica Retirement study, “The Saver’s Credit: A Tax Credit That Pays to Save for Retirement,” the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies says that the number of U.S. tax filers who have claimed the credit increased from 5.3 million in 2002 to 9.6 million in 2019.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The average amount of the credit dipped from $199 in 2002 to $191 in 2019. On the other hand, the annual cost of the saver’s credit to the federal government has grown from $1.06 billion in 2002 to $1.84 billion in 2019, the study says.

The TCRS study finds that only 48% of workers at for-profit companies are aware of the saver’s credit. Awareness is even lower among workers who are more likely to be eligible to benefit from it. Part-time workers are less aware than full-time workers (40% vs. 50%) and women are less aware than men (41% vs. 54%).

The study says employers play an essential role in facilitating retirement savings by providing workplace retirement savings plans, such as 401(k) or similar plans, or payroll-deducted IRAs. Workers with access to those plans are more likely to save for retirement than those without them.

Workers at for-profit companies with a household income of less than $50,000 have saved $3,000 in all household retirement accounts, and workers with a household income of $50,000 to $99,999 have saved $42,000, compared with $172,000 among those with a household income of more than $100,000, the study says. Part-time workers’ savings are substantially less than full-time workers’ ($29,000 vs. $74,000) and women’s savings are less than half that of men’s ($43,000 vs. $91,000). These vulnerable groups could especially benefit from the saver’s credit, the TCRS notes.

Communicating information about the saver’s credit can be valuable for employees, but the study found that only 43% of employers both are aware of the credit and actively promote it to their employees. Large and medium-size companies are more likely to promote the credit—75% and 64% of them do, respectively—than small companies, of which only 36% do. Additionally, the study found that 38% of employers were not even aware of the credit.

To help improve retirement security, especially among vulnerable demographic groups, the study says a collective effort is needed to maximize the impact of the credit. The study recommends implementing an educational campaign to promote the saver’s credit and how to claim it.

The study also suggests policymakers consider opportunities to enhance and expand the credit by making the saver’s credit refundable so that all retirement savers who meet the income and eligibility requirements can fully benefit. Currently, the credit only benefits those with a tax liability, but by making it refundable, low- to middle-income workers without a tax liability would be incentivized to save and benefit.

The study also suggests eliminating the non-income-related eligibility requirements, which hold that one must be 18 or older, cannot be a fulltime student and cannot be claimed as a dependent on another’s tax return. The current requirements exclude younger workers who should be encouraged to start saving as early as possible so they can maximize their long-term savings horizon and benefit from the potential compounding of investments.

Retirement Plan Appreciation Remains High

However, survey data shows there are some areas where employers could improve their communication strategies to optimize plan utilization and understanding.

TIAA released its 2022 Retirement Insights Survey last week, and among the findings are clear signs that employers need to remain focused on the fundamentals of quality retirement plan communications. 

While they say important gains have been made, employers remain concerned about employees not knowing enough about financial topics and not making the most of their company’s retirement plans. TIAA’s data shows 56% of employers cited this worry in 2020, and the number has since increased to 61%.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Relatedly, the TIAA research shows only 44% of employees are currently receiving financial advice. Of this group, the majority—or 31% of the total respondent population—found an adviser on their own, compared with the 13% of the respondent population that were linked to their current adviser by their employer.

Those employees who are more likely to say they have manageable debt levels are overrepresented among participants who say they work with an adviser, own annuities and feel they understand their employer’s retirement plan well. According to TIAA, those who understand their plan well are also more likely to say retirement savings are a current goal.

When it comes to the lingering impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the TIAA data shows some clear effects. A nearly two-thirds majority say the pandemic has either significantly or marginally increased their overall level of stress. At the same time, 56% of employees surveyed say they now appreciate their company’s health insurance benefits either significantly or marginally more than they did prior to the pandemic’s onset. On the other hand, only 48% say the same about their employer’s retirement plan.

According to the survey, knowledge among both employers and employees regarding the requirements and opportunities stemming from the passage of the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act in late 2019 has decreased over the past two years. In the latest survey, 38% of the total survey respondents say they are extremely or very knowledgeable about the SECURE Act, which is down from 50% in 2020. Fewer say they are extremely or very familiar with the legislation’s lifetime income disclosure requirements, and the same is true when it comes to the law’s provisions requiring greater portability of in-plan annuity products.

Much of the survey data speaks to the evolving levels of interest voiced by employers and employees about in-plan guaranteed lifetime income products. Among employees not interested in an in-plan GLI annuity, cost is the top reason cited. According to TIAA, employers recognize this dynamic, and they often see products’ complexity as a major challenge preventing broader adoption of GLI solutions. Generally speaking, employees see such products as being more pricey, more confusing and more restrictive than employers do—perceptions that highlight the opportunity for targeted education and communication efforts. TIAA says employers will need to emphasize the lower costs of these options in-plan versus outside of their plan to appeal to employees.

Employers can also consider including more targeted and nuanced information alongside mandatory income projections. According to the survey, almost two-thirds of employers think income disclosure will increase employees’ GLI interest. Case in point: over seven in 10 employees have received a retirement income projection and say it is helpful.

«

You have 0 free articles remaining

Become a Washington Technology Insider today!
Already an Insider? Login here