Empower Participants’ Retirement Savings Fall

Despite savings rates decreasing slightly, 75% of study respondents are not planning to reduce retirement contributions.

Retirement savings rates have decreased 0.20%, the number of participants taking out loans increased 13% and hardship withdrawals jumped 24%, over the last 12 months, new Empower data shows.

Average account balances for participants surveyed have declined by approximately 27%, over the last year, finds the research study, Empowering America’s Financial Journey – How People Save, Invest and Get Advice. The decline is due to poor investment performance that aligns with broad drops in equity and fixed income markets, Empower states in the study.

Several challenges to workers’ retirement preparedness are coalescing, explains Edmund F. Murphy III, president and CEO at Empower.

“When the economy is experiencing a downturn, American workers need guidance and support to help deter them from making financial decisions that may negatively affect them down the road,” he states in a press release.

Inflationary pressures from increased prices and market declines in 2022 are taking a toll on retirement savers, as many are being forced to prioritize short-term financial challenges over long-term goals, such as retirement, Empower finds.

Empower data also shows that more than nine of 10 respondents consider inflation a top concern, followed by recession fears at 85% and cost of health care at 83%. The study finds 50% of respondents have cut back on daily expenditures to counter inflation.

“We found that nearly half of Americans have cut back on daily expenses, created a budget or cut back on entertainment and one in five Baby Boomers and Gen Xers postponed retirement,” adds Luis Fleites, director of thought leadership for Empower.

The share of study respondents who consider retirement a top financial goal dropped to 53% from 67%, the study finds. Empower data also shows, for retirement plan participants, ‘making ends meet’ is now a top financial goal for 26% of Americans.

The study also finds, despite the “free money” reference to describe an employer’s matching contribution that almost 30% of participants aren’t maximizing their employers match and the percent increased to 48% for  — eligible workers who do not interact with the retirement plan — unengaged participants — compared to 22% of engaged participants.

Additionally, engaged participant savings rates are 56% higher than rates for unengaged participants, Empower data shows.

According to the study, when respondents were asked what actions — from a list of 14 — they have taken, plan to take or have plans to take to counter inflation 71% of Americans say they are not planning on selling assets or investments , compared to 16% who are planning to and 13% who have already.

The study finds 51% are not expecting to change their risk tolerance or approach to retirement investing and 75% are not planning to contribute less to their retirement savings accounts, compared to 12% who plan to decrease contributions and 13% who have done so.

Despite challenges facing retirement plan participants, “it’s encouraging to see that most savers haven’t changed their investment approach and are still focused on saving and planning for their future,” adds Murphy, in the release.

“This illustrates that while we are shifting our focus on short-term spending and planning for now, most savers are still trying to remain long-term focused,” says Fleites.

The study included key takeaway recommendations for plan sponsors to help bolster workers’ retirement readiness from survey respondents.

Empower said it was important to remember that respondents were asked what financial advice they would offer their younger selves, with saving early and as much as possible their overwhelming message:

  • Save as much as you can: Target saving for retirement a total of 10% to 15% of income but if you can’t, save what you can.
  • Max your match: Make sure you’re maximizing the employer retirement plan match.
  • Save consistently: If you change jobs, don’t take time off from saving for retirement and don’t reduce your savings rate. The key is to save consistently.

The Empower survey was conducted by FGS Global on behalf of Empower. The study included an online survey of full-time employees at for-profit companies with access to a defined contribution plan offered by their employer and was conducted from August 2 to 14 with a sample size of 2,505 Americans between the ages of 18 and 70.

Empower recordkeeping data cover 4.3 million participant accounts with their current employer from primarily corporate defined contribution plans with balances greater than zero, according to the recordkeeper data.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

SECURE 2.0: What’s Not to Like? Nothing, Apparently.

It is becoming harder and harder to find a party who offers anything other than support for SECURE 2.0.

It seems as if everyone from Allianz to Wells Fargo has offered support for the retirement reforms package dubbed SECURE 2.0.

SECURE 2.0 consists of two Senate bills and one House bill that are widely expected to be consolidated and passed this December.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

An industry letter circulated by the Insured Retirement Institute and sent to Congressional leadership urging the passage of SECURE 2.0 was signed by 61 industry participants and lobbying organizations, including the American Retirement Association, Fidelity Investments and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

The letter notes that life expectancies for retired Americans are extending at a time when many Americans have damaged financial health as a result of the pandemic. The letter particularly praises the provisions that would make it easier for small businesses to offer retirement plans and for workers with student debt to have their debt payments matched by their employer as retirement plan contributions.

Brad Campbell, a partner at the Faegre Drinker law firm, said during an online webinar Thursday that SECURE 2.0 is still expected to pass during the lame-duck session of Congress, but will likely have to pass without “regular order” due to how little time is left in the year. Regular order is the standard long-form process of legislating, which includes time for amendments and hearings. Campbell was especially enthusiastic about provisions for auto-enrollment, auto-escalation and student loan repayment matching.

A provision found in all three bills that has received vociferous support from Vanguard is the provision that would allow 403(b) plans to invest via collective investment trusts, which under current law is permissible for 401(k) plans but not 403(b), according to David Stinnett, the head of strategic retirement consulting at Vanguard. A CIT is a vehicle similar to a mutual fund that is only available to qualified retirement plans but which is exempt from certain regulations that normally apply to mutual funds and is often subject to lower fees than mutual funds.

Stinnett also praised the student-loan provision, as well as the emergency savings provisions, which vary across the three bills. One Senate bill provides for pension-linked emergency savings accounts, while the other Senate bill and the House bill make emergency withdrawals from a retirement plan easier. Stinnett says both approaches have their merits but believes that allowing for easier withdrawals from retirement plans would be somewhat easier administratively for sponsors than a separate ESA. He also hopes Congress will account for that sponsors will have to undertake in the final bill.

Jessica Sclafani senior defined contribution analyst at T. Rowe Price, also supported the 403(b) provision at a press event on Thursday.

In addition to the letter organized by the IRI, the Bipartisan Policy Center Action organization published an open letter on Thursday urging passage of SECURE 2.0 particularly praising its emergency savings provisions. The letter also encouraged legislators to consider expanding access to emergency savings for those who lack retirement plan access, a reference to all three bills linking emergency savings to retirement savings in some way.

This surge of recent public support for SECURE 2.0 could reflect anxiety that it might not be passed on time. If the legislation is not passed by January 3, 2023, the legislation would have to be re-introduced fresh in the new Congress. This would not likely be a death sentence for the package, but it would significantly postpone its adoption.

Industry watchers believe, however, that it will pass attached to a must-pass bill in December, and Senator Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said on a press call Tuesday that he expects the legislation to pass this year.

«