U.S. State, Municipal Pensions Saw Funding Statuses Fall 6.6% in 2022

The Equable Institute released its final 2022 projections for U.S. state and local public pensions funding status, revealing the best—and worst—funded state pensions.

The national average funded ratio for U.S. state and local public pension plans is estimated to have declined 6.6% last year, from 83.9% in 2021 to 77.3% in 2022, according to a recently released end-of-year report on public pensions from the Equable Institute. The drop is primarily due to negative asset returns, which averaged -6.14% in 2022, falling well short of assumed annual returns laid out in pension plan designs, which had projected an average of a 6.9% annual gain.

Equable used figures from 76.4% of the 225 retirement systems with available data that reported preliminary investment returns for their full fiscal 2022 to inform the prediction. The remaining plans with available data have fiscal years that end on December 31 and will be reporting in the coming months.

During 2022, states and cities made full contributions to their pension funds and, in many cases, even provided supplemental contributions. However, poor investment returns in 2022 drove down the average funded ratio for state and local plans.

Equable found that state and public pensions in Connecticut, Mississippi, New Jersey, Illinois, Kentucky and South Carolina are at a critical funding level, meaning their pensions are less than 60% fully funded against the liabilities due to pensioners. Kentucky, at 47.3% funded, and Illinois, at 50% funded, were the worst funded states in the nation to end 2022.

Conversely, Washington, D.C. and Washington state topped Equable’s aggregate funded ratio rankings, with funded ratios of 103.4% and 102.9%, respectively. Similarly, pension systems in Iowa, Tennessee, New York, Nebraska, Wisconsin and South Dakota earned top marks by maintaining average funded statuses greater than 90%, a ratio deemed “resilient” by Equable.

2022’s negative returns erased nearly half of the funded ratio gains of 2021, which Equable explains was an outlier. “Last year’s incredible investment returns (24.8% on average) did include some future returns that were ‘pulled forward’ and ultimately led to a market correction,” according to the firm’s report.

As a repercussion of market movements, the total pension funding shortfall, also known as an unfunded liability gap, will increase to $1.45 trillion in 2022, reversing the one-year drip below the $1 trillion funding gap line in 2021.

“Strong investment returns in 2021 led to a decline in unfunded liabilities, down to $986.6 billion, [though] that pension debt has increased back up to $1.45 trillion as of 2022’s calendar year end, due to poor investment returns,” the Equable report stated, noting that the better-than-expected performance in private equity during 2022 kept this increase from being even greater.

According to the report, Equable does not expect most pension funds to hit their assumed rates of return for 2023, due to a variety of reasons, including: major public market indices being effectively flat over the last six months; the lag in reporting equity values on non-mark-to-market assets, such as private equity placements; the war in Ukraine; and the specter of more interest rate increases by the Federal Reserve. “Pension fund trustees should be considering lower investment assumptions, and state legislatures should be looking at larger contribution rates,” the report states.

Investment consultancy Wilshire found in an end-of-year report on the funding statuses of U.S. state public pensions that the aggregate funded ratio for U.S. state public pension plans increased by 3.1% during the fourth quarter of 2022, finishing at a funded ratio of 68.4%. Despite the gains in funding status during Q4, funding statuses in the quarter in November, estimated at 70.5% to end that month.

“Calendar year 2022 caps a volatile year for markets with the FT Wilshire 5000 Index ending 2022 down 19%, which is its fourth worst calendar year return,” wrote Ned McGuire, managing director at Wilshire. “This quarter’s ending funded ratio has fallen to its level [not seen since] the end of the second quarter of 2020, after the onset of COVID-19.”

Key Actuarial Changes for Public Pension Plans in 2023

The Actuarial Standards Board approved changes for public pension plans’ investment portfolio risk assessments, disclosures of employer contributions and investment gain/loss analyses.  

Changed actuarial standards of practice—ASOP 4—are no epic bedtime story.

Funding valuation reports for public pension plans will have to include additional information following several actuarial changes approved by the Actuarial Standard Board, part of the American Academy of Actuaries, in the finalized Actuarial Standards of Practice No. 4., Measuring Pension Obligations and Determining Pension Plan Costs or Contributions.

The changed standards are effective for any actuarial report that meets the following criteria, according to the ASOP 4:

  • The actuarial report is issued on or after February 15, 2023; and
  • The measurement date in the actuarial report is on or after February 15, 2023.


“In some cases, these are things that some [public pension plan] reports already include. So for any given public pension plan, they may see all of these as changes or some of them may not represent a change,” says Rebecca Sielman, a principal and consulting actuary at Milliman.

The changes require public pension plans in the valuation report to include an assessment of the portfolio investment risk with a low default risk obligation measure. This will disclose a reasonable actuarially determined contribution and additional analysis of how the plan’s funded status changed from the prior measurement, she says.  

Sielman outlined four changes: “Does the report include this new liability measurement using the low default risk obligation measure? Secondly, does the report include splitting the investment gain or loss from noninvestment gains or losses? The third change requires the report disclose a reasonable actuarially determined contribution.”

She adds, “The fourth is: Does the report talk about the implications of the plan’s funding policy on the expected levels of future contributions and funded status? Those are the four things. That’s our checklist as we look through our valuation reports to make sure that those four things are in place for public pension plans.”

The changes “should have no impact on the prevalence of public pension plans or levels of benefits provided,” Sielman says. “It’s providing additional information in our funding valuation reports, so it shouldn’t have any impact on costs on benefits or whether pension plans continue to exist or how they’re funded. We’re just providing additional information.”

Sielman explains this is to get at the question of “How can we get our arms around the impact of the risk that is being taken with the investments?”

The changed standards are driving at improved transparency, disclosures and risk assessments within public pension plans’ diversified asset portfolios, says Todd Tauzer, national public sector retirement practice leader at Segal.

Requiring pensions to use low default risk obligation measures to calculate the plan’s portfolio assets changes the discount rate. Public and private pension plans use a discount rate, which is the interest rates used to determine the current value of estimated future benefit payments, according to the Government Accountability Office website.

The reasonable calculation rate change was approved to help public pension plans arrive at a greater assessment of the appropriate yearly funding amount to bring the pension to complete funded status. Not all public pension plans use a funding policy that is based on the employer contributing an actuarily determined contribution rate, says Sielman.

Instead, some public pension plan sponsors use a predetermined contribution rate, explains Sielman.

“Typically, it’s expressed as a percentage of payroll that is fixed and not actuarially determined at 12% of pay or 14% of pay [and] it’s a fixed contribution rate, not an actuarially determined contribution rate,” she says. “That fixed contribution rate may not be enough to bring the plan to a fully funded position within a reasonable period. This modification to is to make sure that plan sponsors have the framework for judging a fixed contribution rate and whether it is adequate to bring a plan to a fully funded position within a reasonable period of time.”

She adds, “There are many pension plans that do already have an actuarially determined contribution and contributed, or maybe they don’t contribute it, but at least they know what it is.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

 

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.