Everything You Need to Know About Maryland Saves

The state-managed auto-IRA program launched in September 2022 and should cross $1 million in AUM in the coming days.

The Maryland Small Business Retirement Savings Program, commonly known as MarylandSaves, is Maryland’s state-managed IRA program which launched in September 2022. The program offers a simple retirement option for small businesses that might be deterred by the cost of creating a 401(k) plan for their employees.

Signing up is supposed to be as easy as possible, “a 15-minute deal”, says Josh Gotbaum, the chair of the Maryland Small Business Retirement Savings Board and a guest scholar at the Brookings Institution, and lot of effort went into making that so. Employers share their payroll information with MarylandSaves, which handles the rest.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Glenn Simmons, CEO and executive director of MarylandSaves, explains that the plan is very similar to a Roth IRA. Annual contributions are limited to $6,500 per year, and the contributions are made after taxes.

Simmons says he and his staff are concerned about this relatively small annual savings limit but notes that many of the participants are lower-income and are thus unlikely to be encumbered by the limit. He also says that the goal was to “start with what we can,” and it was essential to prioritize getting the program launched, enroll participants quickly, and then figure out items like contribution limits later.

How It Works

After an employer registers, MarylandSaves contacts the employee “at least three times” over the course of the next 30 days and automatically enrolls the employee in the plan, contributing 5% of salary if they do not respond. Participants can opt out or change their contributions at any time.

Gotbaum explains that MarylandSaves takes sponsorship responsibilities away from the employer. Instead, employers give Maryland their payroll information and, assuming the employee does not opt out, the state processes the payroll deduction. According to Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, an adviser to the U.S. Secretary of Labor, former board member of MarylandSaves and former Maryland lieutenant governor, employers are not allowed to offer a match on these contributions.

Townsend explains that small businesses often struggle more than larger companies to offer a retirement plan and suffer economically for it, because it makes it harder to hire and retain talented employees.

Of all the states that currently have an auto-IRA program, Maryland is the only one that uses an incentive, rather than a penalty, to encourage enrollment. Maryland has a $300 annual business report filing fee, but if an employer already has a sponsored retirement plan or joins MarylandSaves, the fee is waived. Only businesses that have existed for two years are longer are subject to this requirement.

This feature of MarylandSaves comes from the unique political circumstances in which the related legislation was passed. Gotbaum explains that the early stages of MarylandSaves were negotiated when Martin O’Malley, a Democrat, was governor, with both legislative houses controlled by Democrats.

How It Started

When Larry Hogan, a Republican, became governor in 2015, the negotiations to establish MarylandSaves changed because in Maryland, as in many states, an auto-IRA is much more popular with Democrats than with Republicans. Waiving the filing fee, which Hogan had wanted to remove in any case, was one concession made to Republicans who opposed a mandate or a penalty.

Gotbaum also explains that financial advisers have opposed state programs of this kind because of the concern they might lose out on potential clients, “even though this was business that nobody had yet.”

One such skeptic was Andy Serafini, a Maryland state senator from 2015 to 2020 and the highest-ranking Republican on the Maryland Budget and Taxation Committee at the time. He is now a senior vice president and financial adviser at Wealth Enhancement Group.

Serafini explains that he initially opposed the legislation that would create MarylandSaves. He insisted that the incentive to join the program be a “carrot” instead of a “stick” and was averse to placing a mandate on small businesses. Waiving the $300 filing fee became the answer to that objection.

Townsend and Gotbaum are not sure if waiving the fee will be as effective penalizing employers that do not offer retirement savings options. Maryland is the only state with an IRA program that incentivizes participation in this way, so its results could impact future policies in other states.

Serafini said that financial advisers and the insurance industry strongly opposed the program, but he understood that something like it would pass eventually and that it could help Maryland’s retirement security. He also noted it could help address the employee recruitment-and-retention issues that small businesses in the state have as a consequence of not having a retirement plan.

He proposed that the program should have investment options other than a default target-date fund so that advisers could still advise clients on how to invest, potentially bringing them some advisory business. MarylandSaves now offers a standard investment option, with an emergency savings fund for up the first $1,000 of contributions and a target-date fund for further contributions, and a self-directed option that includes the standard options, plus a bond index fund and a global growth  stock fund option.

Serafini’s main negotiating partner was a Democrat on the Budget and Taxation Committee at the same time, State Senator Jim Rosapepe, who is also a member of MarylandSaves’ Board. Gotbaum goes so far as to say the bill was primarily negotiated between the two.

Rosapepe confirms that “some of the private pension folks did not want competition.” The initial proposal also had a penalty for non-compliance which was opposed by many Republicans. The compromise was to remove the $300 filing fee, and 2023 is the first year in which covered businesses will be exempt.

Serafini also objected to the government picking investments itself. As a result, according to Gotbaum, MarylandSaves was set up as a nonprofit governed by the Maryland Small Business Retirement Savings Board, which is a fiduciary. The investments are selected by the board of financial professionals that includes Gotbaum, a former head of the U.S. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., and Phyllis C. Borzi, who was the assistant U.S. secretary of labor of the Employee Benefits Security Administration until 2017.

The program is chaired by Gotbaum, and the State Treasurer Dereck E. Davis and Secretary of Labor Portia Wu serve as ex-oficio members. Nine delegates also serve on the board, three appointed by each of the governor, the Maryland House of Delegates and the Maryland Senate.

The legislation that created the Maryland Small Business Retirement Savings Program passed the Maryland Senate unanimously in 2016, and Hogan agreed to fund the program’s startup costs.

How It’s Going

According to Simmons, MarylandSaves had about 1,700 registered employers participating and about 2,400 savers, as of March 28. The average monthly contribution is $167, and the average account balance is $392. Simmons says the program should cross $1 million in assets under management by mid-April.

Simmons says the primary obstacle to enrollment is a lack of awareness of the program. Many small businesses, and even other government institutions in Maryland, do not yet know about the program. Funding for marketing will be an important priority going forward, according to Simmons.

MarylandSaves also permits gig workers and the self-employed to enroll. Simmons explains that an Uber driver can connect their checking account to MarylandSaves and set up automatic payments with a minimum contribution of $5 a month.

Investment Options

MarylandSaves wanted to keep investment options simple, says Simmons, and therefore opted to keep options few. For emergency savings, the program uses an insurance product from Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. that has a guaranteed return of 1%.

The first $1,000 a participant puts into the plan is put into an emergency savings account. Townsend explains that the IRA does not have an early withdrawal penalty, so the from the IRA itself. The ESA is “for” emergencies, but the IRA is “for” retirement, even though either could be used for both.

MarylandSaves uses the Blackrock TDF suite as its default investment, but participants can elect to shift contributions to the State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund and/or the T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund.

Next Step: A Social Security Bridge

Simmons says the agency did consider providing annuities as part of the plan but says Townsend recommended helping participants get the most value out of “the annuity they already have,” referring to Social Security.

MarylandSaves is working to structure payments to retirees such that they are more likely to be able to postpone claiming their Social Security benefits until age 70 instead of claiming at 62, so retirees can maximize the value they receive. MarylandSaves also intends to include education and warnings to participants to inform them of their potential losses if they claim Social Security early.

Simmons emphasizes that nothing is finalized yet related to the Social Security bridge, but it is a feature at which they are looking closely and hope to implement soon.

Townsend was widely credited for pitching this idea to MarylandSaves, but she gives credit to Alicia Munnell of Boston College, who proposed the idea at a speech on state retirement programs that Townsend attended. Townsend says the Social Security bridge will be essential in helping lower-income retirees maximize their Social Security benefits, but the precise mechanics still need to be worked out.

Accelerated Retirement Plan Closings Put Pressure on Small Employers

A Morningstar report reveals the pandemic caused defined contribution plan closings to spike and new plan creation to slow down. 

 

After the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated retirement plan closings and dampened plan creation, a new report from Morningstar reveals that only 2,090 employers cover 50% of U.S. workers with retirement plans, leaving a heavy burden on small employers. 

While long-term growth may appear to make the retirement system look stable, Morningstar analysts argued that those numbers mask underlying turnover of thousands of plans and outflows of billions of dollars.  

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Morningstar’s “2023 Retirement Plan Landscape Report stated that the U.S. defined contribution system relies on new employers to create, on average, 44,000 plans per year to compensate for the more than 377,000 plans that closed from 2012 to 2021.  

The value of assets in plans has dropped by an average of more than $400 billion each year since 2015, according to the report, as plan assets shrink in years without strong investment returns. The system depends on new contributions and strong returns. 

“The COVID-19 pandemic did not dramatically throw off this delicately balanced system, but it did provide a warning for policymakers and plan sponsors of how future economic disruptions could cause the system to stop adding plans at a fast enough rate to replace the tens of thousands that close every year,” the report stated. 

Pandemic’s Impact 

Morningstar estimated that the beginning of the pandemic caused the number of plans closing to spike, as more than 40,000 plans closed in 2020.

Overall, Morningstar found that mega plans—those with more than $500 million in assets—mitigated the pandemic’s overall impact, and by 2020, these plans added more than 15.8 million people and covered 45% of all U.S. DC plan participants.  

In comparison, small and medium plans with $100 million or fewer in assets added fewer than 1.5 million participants in the same span, with their market shrinking to 38% of U.S. participants by 2020 from 48% in 2011, according to Morningstar. 

“The U.S. system does not work nearly as well for people who are not fortunate enough to work for larger, established employers, the general sponsor profile for larger plans,” according to the report. 

From a cost perspective, the larger the plan, the less expensive it is likely to be for participants to invest in retirement. Small plans remain, on average, more than twice as expensive as mega plans, Morningstar states.  

The median small plan moved the needle slightly faster, dropping 4 basis points in 2020 compared with 2019, while medium, large and mega plan total costs fell by 2, 3 and 1 bps, respectively. 

“The majority of DC plan participants are in larger plans and benefit from lower costs of these, with 80% of participants in plans charging less than 80 basis points,” the report said. 

Workers at smaller employers with smaller plans, who are saving just as much as those at employers with larger plans, could potentially have 9% less saved in assets at retirement, simply due to higher fees. 

PEPs Could Make a Big Impact 

This struggle for smaller plans to offer low-fee investments to participants is what partially motivated Congress to create pooled employer plans in 2019, as PEPs should allow more small employers to pool their assets and achieve the scale—and lower fees—of large employers, according to Morningstar.  

However, while PEPs have the potential to reduce fees for participants as new plans grow, Morningstar argued that there will be challenges due to the complex structure of allowing multiple employers to operate in one plan. 

“If there is a proliferation of PEPs without significant enough asset concentration to provide the benefits of scale larger single-employer plans enjoy, the benefits to workers could be muted,” Morningstar reported. 

Because PEPs were only rolled out in 2021, Morningstar has not fully studied them yet, but the report stated the firm’s belief they can help close the gap between small and large plans if there is “sufficient and smart uptake.” 

CITs Charge Less 

Morningstar analysts also suggested that the adoption of collective investment trusts could aid in lowering costs for smaller plans. CITs are pooled-investment vehicles organized as trusts, maintained by a bank or trust company, and are managed in accordance with a common investment strategy.  

CITs, according to Morningstar, can offer a significant benefit to workers saving for retirement through reduced expenses, as they typically charge participants less than mutual funds.  

From 2012 to 2019, looking at all plans except mega plans, assets in CITs and mutual funds both grew at roughly the same average year-over-year rates: 7.3% and 7.9%, respectively, according to the report. In the following two years, among the same cohort of plans, CIT assets grew more quickly: 10.8%, compared with 8.7% for mutual funds.  

Morningstar found that much of the growth in CIT assets occurred in plans with between $100 million and $500 million in assets. Even plans smaller than this increased their use of CITs by more than $15 billion in this two-year period, the report showed. 

“Reaching a broader range of plans has been a struggle for CITs, but the most recent data shows the tide could be turning as CIT assets in smaller plans are growing not just in raw terms, which can always be partially attributed to market returns, but also in terms of percentage of total assets,” the report stated. 

Morningstar’s report, which analyzed 2020 and 2021 plan-year data, used data filed by U.S. retirement plans on Form 5500 and collected by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration. The report was limited to plans covered by Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as these plans file Form 5500 annually.  

 

«