AI Has Potential to Improve Plan Design, Expand Retirement Plan Access

Users may not be able to rely on artificial intelligence for financial advice yet, but technological developments are already making plan sponsors more efficient.

In the past few years, a retirement plan would be considered tech-savvy if it gave employees savings nudges on their birthday or hire date.

That’s changing—fast.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Tech-forward retirement plan providers, recordkeepers and third-party administrators are using artificial intelligence—including machine learning, large language models and even ChatGPT—to digitize and automate mundane plan administration tasks to reduce plan sponsors’ burdens and costs. Not only does it mean less work for plan sponsors, it is also making it easier for employees to save.

It’s necessary, too, as the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 mandates actions such as automatic enrollment and automatic escalation, which will require software updates.

Newer and smaller retirement plan providers are using technology to get a foothold in the industry and service more small- and midsize employers. In the future, technology may ease employee plan access, tailor investment offerings and perhaps offer advice, although sources interviewed for this story say technology is not there yet. The human touch is not going away, but it may just get more efficient.

Where We Are Now

Rakesh Mahajan, chief revenue officer at Human Interest Inc., a full-service 401(k) and 403(b) provider for small and midsize businesses, says digitizing and automating much of the retirement plan administration eliminates paperwork that was common even a few years ago. That efficiency makes it easier, faster and cheaper for plan sponsors to roll out benefits and simpler for employees to use. For new employees, accounts and investments are set up with a few mouse clicks. Eventually, he would like to make that even simpler.

“My aspiration is to have a magic button for everything,” Mahajan says.

Kevin Gaston, director of plan design consulting at Vestwell, says taking care of the administrative burden for plan sponsors also helps reduce their legal and compliance risks when offering the benefit, and technology can also flag other potential risks, such as alerting plan sponsors to late deposits or other issues.

On the Horizon

Chad Noorani, a retirement plan consultant at Benefit Financial Services Group, has experimented with using ChatGPT to gather compliance information and create a framework for blog posts that he would eventually rewrite to include his own resources and links. AI could help small retirement planners like Noorani become more efficient by, for example, writing code and personalizing materials to meet client needs. Efficiencies could allow him to scale his business and spend more time with clients.

“Business development may get easier; it may help you prospect better,” Noorani says, noting such automation could eliminate irrelevant discussions, such as pitching services that a plan sponsor may not need or want.

In the same vein, some retirement plans offer one-size-fits-most investment options, such as target-date funds, which may not be suitable for employees who have outside assets or competing savings goals.

Dani Fava, group head of product innovation at Envestnet, says machine learning and predictive analysis tools can make retirement plan design more customizable and help plan advisers create better savings strategies, even when employees have not entered all of their information. Envestnet’s Insights Engine uses machine learning to sift through its data and that of other connected data providers, plus an employee’s unique information, to find patterns. It can predict when a participant has outside assets and what type of assets with more than 75%accuracy. When Generative AI is included in the design of a retirement plan administration system, the toolcan learn from plan data and may be able to create more accurate or tailored offerings, she adds.

In coming years, plan sponsors are likely to have more participants who have more retirement savings, who will need greater support, Fava says. Generative AI could be used to create an asset allocation from the plan investment menu or identify the right level of savings without employees having to answer the usual risk tolerance questions.

Fava says this technology could be available in about a year, but getting regulators and plan sponsors comfortable using it is probably three to five years away.

Gaston says AI and fintech could expand access to robust savings tools, even at smaller businesses and for employees at all pay levels. “We look at it as a force multiplier, downwards and outwards.”

He says while AI’s effect on performance will be closely followed, he thinks AI could be used to offer investment guidance, such as spotting portfolio risk that is out of balance or finding new ways to increase savings. Gaston sees AI’s greatest benefit as improving financial wellness and finding that next dollar of savings, more than affecting asset management.

Industry sources reiterate that retaining a human touch will be important because of the emotions tied up with money. Humans will need to give AI boundaries, especially in a field of complex legal and rigorous compliance regulations. “You can tell Chat GPT to make me the best plan design. … It may not be fair or equitable, so it’s not good,” Gaston says.

The Far Future

Giuseppe Sette, president and co-founder of Toggle AI, says his firm is teaching large language models how to invest, educating the models  on financial concepts that will allow them to better understand and analyze investment problems. In the distant future, plan advisers might be able to assign some asset management decisions to AI, which he dubs an evolved version of “robo-advisory.” He also considers creating a drawdown strategy in retirement “another incredibly fertile opportunity” for AI.

However, Sette cautions that there is no room for error when using AI in finance or retirement planning because of the strict regulations and compliance. After all, AI still has a propensity to “hallucinate,” or make up answers, or it could identify investment opportunities using incorrect or inaccurate criteria.

To avoid those problems, Sette says AI developers would need to narrow the intent and type of questions a user asks an AI-enabled tool, so that the AI system can understand what the user wants. Critically important is establishing safeguards to control what the model says back to the user.

Relying on AI for financial advice remains some time off, but Sette is clearly bullish on the progress already made.

“It’s easy to get Pollyannish, because it’s very likely the most exciting technology we’ve seen [in] the last—I don’t know, ever,” he says.

Supreme Court Strikes Down Biden’s Student Loan Forgiveness Plan

The court’s conservative majority rejected President Biden’s plan to cancel up to $20,000 in student loan debt for eligible borrowers. 

The Supreme Court Friday ruled against President Joe Biden’s student loan forgiveness program that would have canceled up to $20,000 in student loan debt for millions of eligible borrowers. 

In the 6-3 decision, the court’s majority ruled that the Biden administration overstepped its power by attempting to forgive more than $400 billion in student loans because it had not been explicitly approved by Congress. 

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

The court considered two cases: one brought by six states—Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Missouri and South Carolina—and the other brought by two people who have student loan debt outstanding, Myra Brown and Alexander Taylor. The court ruled that the six states that challenged the loan relief program had the proper legal standing to do so, but that Brown and Taylor did not.  

In the Department of Education et al. v. Brown decision, the court rejected the argument that Biden’s plan was lawful under the 2003 Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act, or HEROES Act. The law stated that the government can provide relief for recipients of student loans when there is a “national emergency,” allowing it to act to ensure people are not in a “worse position financially” due to an emergency. 

“The secretary asserts that the HEROES Act grants him the authority to cancel $430 billion of student loan principal. It does not,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote. “We hold today that the act allows the secretary to ‘wave or modify’ existing statutory or regulatory provisions applicable to financial assistance programs under the Education Act, not to rewrite that statute from the ground up.” 

Roberts also argued that the HEROES Act language was not specific enough, arguing that the court’s precedent “requires that Congress speak clearly before a department secretary can unilaterally alter large sections of the American economy.” 

Payments on federal student loans have been on pause since the start of the pandemic, but these payments will now resume in October, according to the Department of Education. Interest on federal student loans will also resume accruing in September. 

Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the dissent, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, that: “In every respect, the Court today exceeds its proper, limited role in our Nation’s governance.” 

In response to the decision, President Biden released a statement expressing his disappointment, but also said that “this fight is not over.” 

“I believe that the Court’s decision to strike down our student debt relief plan is wrong,” Biden said. “But I will stop at nothing to find other ways to deliver relief to hard-working middle-class families.” 

What This Means for Plan Sponsors 

While this ruling now puts pressure on the Biden administration to find an alternative way to forgive student debt that could withstand legal challenge, it also brings to light the importance of student loan benefits, which plan sponsors have the option of offering to employees. 

The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 includes an optional provision that permits employers to make matching contributions to an employee’s retirement account when the employee makes “qualified student loan payments.” The intention is that people would not have to forgo entirely retirement savings while repaying student debt. 

This provision applies to 401(k), 403(b), SIMPLE IRAs and governmental 457(b) plans and is meant to benefit those who were not previously participating in their retirement plans.  

Kristen Carlisle, vice president and general manager of Betterment at Work, said in a statement that the Supreme Court decision “provides a moment for employers to really step up for employees, knowing the heavy financial and mental burden that this debt places on individuals.” 

“It’s time for student loan support to go from a ‘nice to have’ to a fundamental go-to for any company that’s looking to offer a modern financial wellness benefits package,” Carlisle said. “Support can be provided in a variety of ways: whether it’s by offering a student loan management solution to help employees better understand and easily pay down their debt, offering direct contributions through student loan/401(k) matching programs, or offering sessions with a financial advisor.” 

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.