Americans Show Lack of Knowledge, Uptake of Long-Term Care Insurance

The U.S. will soon have more 65-year-olds than ever before, but many are unprepared for long-term care costs, new data from Nationwide shows.

An unprecedented surge of retirement-age Americans is quickly approaching, as the number of people turning 65 every day will increase to more than 12,000 in 2024, according to the Alliance for Lifetime Income. 

Despite this anticipated growth in the country’s retirement-age population, very few are insured for the costs of long-term living, and most don’t understand the basics of long-term care insurance, according to new data from the Nationwide Retirement Institute. 

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Nationwide, in collaboration with LIMRA, surveyed 1,439 adults aged 24 or over between April 25 and May 12, 2023, to understand consumers’ attitudes and perceptions of long-term care protection. 

Unlike traditional health insurance, this type of insurance is designed to cover long-term services and support, including personal and custodial care in a variety of settings, such as one’s home, a community organization or other facility, according to the Department of Health.  

Someone turning 65 today has almost a 70% chance of needing long-term care in their remaining years, according to the Administration for Community Living. Women, on average, need care longer (3.7 years) than men (2.2 years). 

Lack of Education 

While 18% of adults surveyed said they currently own long-term care insurance, including 27% of Millennials, industry data from LIMRA shows only 3.1% of Americans have purchased long-term care insurance, and most of those are older consumers. 

This discrepancy is possibly due to a lack of education around long-term care insurance. For instance, more than half of respondents (51%) in the Nationwide survey confused long-term care insurance with long-term disability insurance, and almost a third (29%) confused it with health insurance.  

When asked about this confusion, survey respondents reported being misled, misunderstanding their policy or mistakenly assuming it was covered by other insurance products, according to Nationwide.  

“Many Americans—mostly Millennials—mistakenly believe they have long-term care coverage, usually in their company’s benefit package, when in fact they do not,” Holly Snyder, president of Nationwide’s life insurance, said in a press release. “Though this misconception is understandable, it puts them in danger of discovering that they don’t have coverage much later on when they really need it.” 

The most common reason for people not purchasing long-term care insurance was it being “too expensive.” Baby Boomers and women were significantly more likely to indicate expense as the reason they don’t currently own long-term care insurance, Nationwide found. More than a quarter of respondents also worry that paying for long-term care will diminish their children’s inheritance.  

Based on a 2022 AALTCI Annual Price Index survey, the average annual long-term care premium is $2,200 for men and $3,700 for women, with a median cost of $2,500. Additionally, as people age, the cost of coverage increases. The average cost estimate for long-term care insurance for a Millennial is $1,500, compared to $2,000 for Gen X and $3,000 for Boomers.  

For those who said they have long-term care insurance, 57% said they purchased the policy to avoid being a financial burden to friends and family, and many said they would feel less like a burden if they could pay family members to take care of them.  

When asked what benefits or features would make respondents reconsider long-term care insurance, many placed a high value on the ability to buy a policy that has guaranteed premiums that will never increase, as well as guaranteed benefits that will stay the same as long as they continue to pay the premiums.  

Some Millennial respondents (26%) said they would like the ability to transfer money from their 401(k) plan or an annuity to purchase coverage.  

Information Sources Differ Among Generations 

Baby Boomers are significantly more likely to seek advice from financial professionals when it comes to selecting a financial product like long-term care insurance, while Millennials tend to lean toward media influencers, blogs and forums. In fact, Nationwide found that more than half of Millennials that have considered buying long-term care insurance in the last 24 months received information about policies via social media.  

Overall, respondents were more likely to speak with their spouse and friends about long-term care costs than they were to speak to a financial professional. Only 7% said they would speak with their employer about these costs.   

More than one in four adults (27%) across all age groups have not discussed long-term care costs with anyone. That said, 30% would discuss long-term care costs with a financial professional in the future, according to the survey.  

Nationwide urges financial professionals, and plan sponsors, to encourage discussions around long-term care costs in retirement even if an individual believes they are covered.  

Former HR Head Sues Investment Manager Alleging Retirement Plan Breaches

The former director of human resources at alternatives specialist Weiss-Multi-Strategy Advisers has sued the company, adviser subsidiary and retirement plan trustee George A. Weiss.   

Hedge fund manager GWA, LLC and George A. Weiss, founder and CEO of the company’s investment adviser subsidiary Weiss Multi-Strategy Advisers LLC, are facing a class action complaint filed on July 24 alleging violations of fiduciary duty and prohibited transactions provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act by fiduciaries for the GWA, LLC 401(k) profit sharing plan. 

Beth Andrew-Berry, formerly director of human resources at Weiss Multi-Strategy Advisers LLC, sued both defendants, alleging five separate fiduciary breach counts against each entity. The lawsuit is Beth Andrew-Berry et al. v. George A. Weiss and GWA, LLC. The complaint was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Hartford Division.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“Defendants violated ERISA’s fiduciary duties…and its prohibitions on self-dealing…by using the Plan and its assets to advance the business interests of GWA, LLC and its founder, George A. Weiss, over those of Plan participants—which are current and former employees of the Company,” Andrew-Berry alleges in the complaint. “As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ breaches of their fiduciary duties, the plan and its participants and beneficiaries have suffered tens of millions of dollars of losses.”

Andrew-Berry’s lawsuit, which was brought by Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, targets the way the plan assets were invested and the assets’ investment in company funds and other concerns. Andrew-Berry is seeking to restore all losses suffered by the plan and its participants and obtain other equitable relief as provided under ERISA, according to the complaint.

The plaintiff claimed 11 instances of breach of fiduciary duty against defendants, under ERISA Section 404

The defendants allegedly breached their fiduciary duties by the following conduct, among other alleged violations:

  • Indulging conflicts of interest when investing in inferior proprietary Weiss fund and failing to properly monitor those funds.
  • Investing in and maintaining an excessive concentration in Weiss funds—the sole plan investments available to participants—for self-interested business reasons.
  • Failing to consider the age demographics of Plan participants and their need to grow their retirement savings through assets and strategies aimed at capital appreciation and growth.

 

As of the most recent data available from December 31, 2021, the plan had approximately $103 million in assets and 187 participants, the complaint shows.

Weiss is a fiduciary to the plan and the plan’s trustee. Andrew-Berry is a participant in the GWA, LLC 401(k) profit-sharing plan, and was an employee of George Weiss Associated Inc. or one of its affiliates from 2016 until 2022, according to the complaint.

The plaintiff seeks to certify a class period applying to all participants in or beneficiaries of the GWA, LLC 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan (F/K/A the George Weiss Associates, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan) at any time on or after July 24, 2017, the complaint states.

Representatives for the defendants did not return a request for comment.   

Andrew-Berry is represented by attorneys with the law offices of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, based in Washington, D.C.

«