How Should Plan Sponsors Stand Up a New Retirement Plan Committee?

Plan sponsors can find education and training for their retirement plan committees from several sources, but how best to build one and why are separate questions.

How Should Plan Sponsors Stand Up a New Retirement Plan Committee?

Extracting optimal value from a retirement plan committee requires careful attention to the committee’s governance structure, composition and operations.

Why Convene a Committee?

Although not every plan sponsor has a plan committee, establishing a panel will increase the plan’s fiduciary oversight, adding value for sponsors covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and benefitting the plan, says Theresa Conti, a senior consultant at July Business Services. Conti champions the value committees can add both by educating and training people who serve on the committee and by providing educational material for participants. 

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Josh Itzoe, founder and CEO of FiduciaryWor(k)s, agrees with Conti that plan sponsors add value to their plans by holding regular meetings and teaching fiduciary training. He says these are “critically important” to the sponsor’s fiduciary duty and oversight. Teaching the members of a plan committee to think about their fiduciary duties to the plan and participants will provide benefits to the sponsor, he adds.

When the committee members are properly taught to understand their fiduciary responsibility, “they understand [the] gravity of what they’re doing and [are] much more likely to be engaged [in trainings], and they’re much more likely to take steps to achieve the outcome, ultimately, they’re trying to do,” Itzoe explains.

Fiduciary regulations under ERISA demand fiduciaries act prudently and solely in the interests of participants, follow the terms of plan documents and that fiduciary decisionmaking must be based on a prudent and well-documented process, ERISA and Department of Labor regulations state. Retirement assets held in 403(b) plans for nonprofit entities that are unaffiliated to a church or government are protected under ERISA.

The presence of an ERISA attorney at meetings is important to ensure members “are staying in alignment with their obligations under ERISA,” says Joan Neri, a counsel in Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. “I find the biggest issue sometimes is when there are meetings that are held without the attorney, and then later on, we’re looking at the minutes or trying to figure out what decisions were made.”

Committee Structure  

Neri advises that sponsors follow a blueprint to build a committee.  

The “starting point [is] to make that [governance] evaluation, present the advantages of having a committee, and then the next step is to provide the committee with guidelines on how they are to operate,” Neri says. “It is really important to have an ERISA attorney spearheading this, because these are laws and legal issues and legal responsibilities that the committee needs to understand.”

Sponsors’ biggest legal and regulatory issues often emerge when the committee members have proposed and decided a plan provision without attorneys present to provide legal guidance, Neri says. 

“[When] we’re looking at the minutes or trying to figure out what decisions were made, sometimes it’s difficult to point to anything specific that can support [why decisions were] a good fiduciary practice,” Neri explains. “The way I do [trainings is] being present at meetings and present at discussions that the committee members have.”

Who Should Serve on Committees?

Smart choices for individuals to serve on a plan committee include company leaders who also have a skill set in investment and finance, Neri advises.

Members are often individuals with titles such as CFO, vice president of finance and comptroller. The majority of a committee’s membership is often comprised of personnel with such backgrounds, Neri says.   

“They will be able to navigate not only the administrative responsibilities that go along with running the plan, but also the investment decision making, which is important,” to lessen the risk of plan sponsors being sued, she adds.   

Charting Next Steps

Once a plan sponsor makes the decision to launch a committee and has selected the members, the next step is to devise committee guidelines that outline how the panel will operate, Neri says. The plan sponsor should establish committee guidelines with a charter, similar to corporate bylaws, she explains.

“The charter will talk about the members’ responsibilities; how they are to run meetings; what constitutes a quorum; can they make decisions without a meeting? How does that work? (which is usually [by] unanimous written consent); their authority to delegate; their authority to delegate to one another once a decision is made; and how often the meeting should be held,” Neri says.

More sophisticated charters incorporate a detailed responsibilities chart that outlines different committee members’ duties in running the plan, she adds.

“What I’ve done for committees is develop a chart where I talk about the responsibility and then talk about who does what in carrying out that responsibility,” Neri says. “For instance, the plan loan responsibility might emanate from the committee, and they oversee it, but it could be that the recordkeeper is handling the actual administration of loans and maybe goes back to the committee only if there [are] certain issues. That has to be parsed out.”

Gen Z Outpaces Previous Generations in Retirement Savings

The youngest generation in the workforce has saved almost three times the amount Gen X households had saved in defined contribution plans at the same age, according to ICI data.

Fueled by the prevalence of defined contribution plans in today’s workplaces, the percentage of Generation Z households with DC plan accounts is more than three times that of similar-age Generation X households in 1989, according to new data published by the Investment Company Institute. 

While younger workers are managing more student loan debt and have suffered from ballooning expenses more than prior generations, ICI found that the long-term financial outlook for this generation is promising, primarily due to DC plans offering automatic enrollment and attractive lineups of diversified investments. 

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Gen Z households in 2022 had two-and-a-half times more assets in their DC plans—adjusted for inflation—than Gen Xers had in 1989 at the same age. ICI stated that the story is similar for Millennial households when compared with the same age cohort in 1989. 

Employees aged 18 to 25 had a median of $5,000 in DC plan assets in 2022, whereas the same age group in 1989 had an adjusted median of $1,729 in plan assets. 

For employees aged 26 to 41 in 2022, median assets averaged $26,000, whereas the same age group in 1989 had adjusted median assets of $11,528.  

Automatic enrollment has also played a role in boosting DC retirement account ownership, as more than half of DC accountholder households younger than 35 in 2023 reported that they had been automatically enrolled into their plans. Automatic features became commonplace for DC plans after the Pension Protection Act of 2006, which partly explains why balances were significantly lower in 1989. Of households aged 18 to 25 in 2022, 24% have a DC plan, while only 7% of the same group had a DC plan in 1989. 

In addition, seven in 10 mutual fund account-holder households younger than 35 in 2023 reported that they purchased their first mutual fund through their employer-sponsored retirement plan.  

ICI argued that defined contribution plans play a significant role in savings, as more than half of DC account owners younger than 35 said they probably would not save for retirement if not for their workplace plan. About 82% of DC savers agreed that the tax treatment of their retirement plans was a big incentive to contribute.  

A recent 401(k) participant study conducted by Charles Schwab found that members of Gen Z are optimistic they will retire sooner than other generations, as the average age at which they expect to retire is 61 years old, whereas Millennials expect to retire at 64, members of Gen X expect to retire at 65 and Baby Boomers expect to retire at 68. 

However, the Schwab survey revealed that Gen Z workers feel they face the most obstacles to saving for a comfortable retirement. These obstacles include inflation, keeping up with expenses, unexpected expenses, helping aging parents financially, saving and paying for children’s education, stock market volatility and paying off credit card debt.  

Because some policymakers have questioned the public value of the tax deferral that retirement plans receive, survey respondents were asked whether the government should take away these tax incentives. ICI found that, overall, nearly nine in 10 respondents disagreed with proposals to remove or reduce tax incentives for retirement savings.  

Respondents also largely disagreed with suggestions to allow the government to prevent individuals from making their own investment decisions in DC accounts, whether while working or in retirement. 

As a whole, the majority of respondents expressed confidence that the 401(k) system and other DC plan accounts will help them in retirement, as 73% said they were either “somewhat” or “very” confident that 401(k) and other employer-sponsored plan accounts can help them meet their retirement goals.  

The ICI report included responses from 2,035 Americans aged 18 and older and was conducted during November and December 2023. 

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.