Strong Markets, Steady Discount Rates Pushed Pension Funded Status Up in January

Corporate pensions funding surpluses rose to 27-month highs last month.

U.S. corporate pension funds continues to exceed 100% funded levels after growing further in January, pushing to a recent high.

Milliman, which tracks the funded status of the largest 100 U.S. plans through the Milliman 100 Pension Funding Index, reported funding ratios of these plans rose to 105.8% at the end of January, up from 104.8% the month before. The gains are largely due to a strong equity market, as well as little change in discount rates. This is the highest funded status level in 27 months, according to Milliman.

Markets returned 1.19% in January, increasing plan assets by $9 billion to $1.308 trillion at the end of the month. Monthly discount rates, used to value plan liabilities, increased by one basis point, to 5.60%, reducing plan liabilities from $1.240 trillion in December 2024 to $1.237 trillion in January. 

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

“The funded status surplus of the Milliman 100 plans reached a 27-month high at the end of January—the perfect start to the year as plan liabilities declined while plan assets grew after market gains exceeded expectations,” said Zorast Wadia, actuary at Milliman, in the firm’s monthly report.

Many companies with pension funds in surplus are choosing to outsource the investment management of their portfolios or to offload their plan liabilities to insurers.

“With Fed[eral Reserve] rate cuts still a possibility this year, prudent asset-liability management remains a key directive for plan sponsors to preserve the funded status gains achieved thus far,” Wadia said.

According to Agilis, plan sponsors saw funded status gains of from 1% to 3% in January. With 2025 expected to be a volatile year, Michael Clark, managing director and chief commercial officer at Agilis, wrote in a note that corporate plans should lock in their gains and offload their pension liabilities.

“We anticipate that 2025 will continue to be volatile, so plan sponsors would do well to lock in gains through their investment strategies and pursuing pension risk transfer strategies,” Clark said.

According to Mercer, which tracks the pension funded status of S&P 1500 companies, these funds saw their solvency increased to 110% in January from 109% in December 2024. Plan surpluses increased to $158 billion in January from $135 billion last December.

Wilshire, which tracks the funded status of corporate plans in the S&P 500, found that the funding surplus increased by 1.8% in January, to 105.4%, the highest funded status level tracked by Wilshire in more than a year, up from 103.6% at the end of December. Over the trailing 12 months, funded status increased by 8.8%.

LGIM America, which tracks the health of a hypothetical corporate defined benefit plan through its Pensions Solutions Monitor, finds that a plan with a 50/50 stock/bond asset allocation saw its funding ratio increase to 112.6% in January from 111.1% last December.

Aon, which tracks the funded status of pension plans of companies in the S&P 500, reported that the funded status of these plans increased to 103.4% in January from 102.5% in December. Plan assets increased by $12 billion, while liabilities decreased by $1 billion.

According to WTW, which tracks the funded status of U.S. retirement plans through its WTW Pension Index, funded status rose to its highest value since mid-2000. In January, the index rose to 124.6, up from 122.2 in December, as strong investment returns offset an increase in liabilities. The index, based on the performance of a hypothetical plan with a 60/40 portfolio, saw investment returns of 2.2% in January. Liabilities increased by 0.2%, due to changes in discount rates, resulting in a 2.0% increase in pension funded status.

October Three Consulting tracks pension finances for two hypothetical funds: Plan A, with a 60/40 allocation, and Plan B, with a 20/80 allocation. The firm found that the funding of Plan A improved more than 1%, while Plan B improved less than 1% in January.

Interest Rates

Interest rates have long been an uncertainty for plan sponsors. Since the Federal Reserve started raising rates in 2022, higher interest rates have contributed to an increase in corporate funded status. Pension surpluses should not be affected by further rate cuts in the near future: Bond markets now predict no cut to the benchmark federal funds rate until December 2025. The strong Consumer Price Index report this week, showing a 3% increase in inflation driven by higher food and energy prices, reinforces the sentiment that the Fed is unlikely to resume rate cuts soon.

“The Federal Reserve paused its campaign of interest rate cuts resulting in minimal month-over-month changes in corporate bond yields—used to value corporate pension liabilities,” said Ned McGuire, a Wilshire managing director, in a statement. “The positive returns across asset classes helped maintain the month-end aggregate funded ratio estimate above 100%.”

Still, there are many uncertainties ahead for plan sponsors, such as the economic impact of federal policies, including tariffs, as well as the direction of interest rates. 

“Markets will be closely watching for the economic impact of the recently announced tariffs and other potential executive actions,” said Matt McDaniel, a partner in Mercer’s wealth practice, in a statement. “The Fed continues to take a ‘wait and see’ approach with interest rates, leaving plan sponsors a lot of uncertainty to process to start the new year.”

ERISA Industry Committee Outlines Latest Employer Priorities

In its letter to Congress, ERIC urged lawmakers to ‘preserve and protect’ ERISA, maintain tax incentives in health and retirement plans, and impost health care cost transparency.

The ERISA Industry Committee sent a letter on Tuesday to members of Congress stating its positions on several policy issues that affect large employer member companies that provide health, retirement and other benefits to workers across the country.

The public letter was released on the heels of the American Benefits Council’s release of its public policy strategic plan for employer-sponsored retirement and health plans for the next five years.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

ERIC’s letter touches on maintaining the current tax incentives in employer-sponsored health and retirement plans but mainly focuses on health care-related issues, such as enhancing high-deductible health plans and health savings accounts and creating more transparency about the cost of health care and prescription drugs.

The letter was specifically addressed to Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, and Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana. According to ERIC, its letter is timely, as Congress considers instructions to individual committees as part of the budget reconciliation process.

ERIC’s letter stated that it is concerned by proposals to cap the federal income tax exclusion for employer-sponsored health coverage in the hopes of paying for the extension of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, a priority for President Donald Trump.

“Doing so would be a direct tax increase on working families, and would be detrimental to employment-based coverage–the single largest source of coverage for millions of workers and their families,” the letter stated. “ERIC strongly opposes any changes to this tax exclusion.”

ERIC also expressed its opposition to any proposal that would weaken incentives on which workers rely to save for retirement.

“Middle class workers rely on tax incentives, longstanding in the tax code, that promote responsible savings and drive investment,” the letter stated. “Reducing the amount Americans can save in tax-preferred vehicles or changing when savings [are] taxed are counterproductive, short-sighted policies that would only undermine the success of the retirement system.”

The comment appeared intended to discourage requiring more retirement-plan contributions to made on an after-tax, or Roth, basis.

In addition, ERIC asked the House Committee on Ways and Means to consider several recommendations to improve “health care affordability and competition.” ERIC highlighted specific health savings account-related bills that the group supports, such as the Telehealth Expansion Act to provide telehealth coverage for HSA beneficiaries and the Health Savings for Seniors Act to permit Medicare beneficiaries to participate in and contribute to HSAs.

Addressing the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, ERIC urged lawmakers to “protect and strengthen” the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The organization also stated it opposes any attempt to mandate state reporting or other administrative obligations on companies that offer ERISA-regulated plans.

“Further erosion of ERISA preemption will adversely impact labor markets, disadvantage employees based on where they live or work, cause employers to cut back on benefit coverage, and raise the cost of health benefits—ultimately pricing some employees and their families out of coverage and undermining financial health and well-being,” the letter stated.

ERIC argued that one key way to strengthen ERISA would be to clarify that third parties performing services on behalf of plan sponsors for health benefit plans are subject to the same fiduciary duty to the plan as plan sponsors. ERIC released an issue brief in September 2024 urging Congress to deem pharmacy benefit managers as fiduciaries under ERISA, as PBMs increasingly have come under scrutiny for having “opaque business practices,” among other issues.

Another of ERIC’s requests to the Committee on Education and the Workforce was to “address out of control, unjustified premiums assessed to defined benefit pension plan sponsors to pay for the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s single-employer insurance program.”

ERIC wrote that PBGC premiums are set by Congress and that it has increased premiums several times in the last 12 years. ERIC urged the Committee on Education and the Workforce to take this opportunity to reduce further premium assessments to the “maximum extent possible.”

«