Trust in retirement plan service providers has dropped below last year’s levels, a study finds, but there’s an opportunity for discussions about ways to improve.
Retirement plan sponsors polled continue to express
deep pessimism about service providers and retirement advisers, with trust in
financial institutions at 8% (a slight dip from 2014’s 9%) and trust in their
current plan provider at 58%, a loss of seven percentage points from last year’s
65%.
Survey respondents assessed their trust in a current provider by levels of agreement
with the statement they “can always trust their provider to do what is right,”
according to the Second Annual Plan Sponsor Trust & Confidence Study by the National
Association of Retirement Plan Participants (NARPP).
The top factor for plan sponsors
for choosing service provider is trustworthiness, which scores higher than participant
customer service, quality of the customer experience, technology, education, administrative
service and cost.
Calculating trust starts with the
plan sponsors’ opinion of service provider competence, says Laurie Rowley, president
and co-founder of NARPP. Can the service provider do the job they’re supposed
to do? To assess actual trust, the survey asked plan sponsors to describe the
amount of trust they have in financial institutions as well as their current
service providers: “How much of the time can you trust financial institutions
to do the right thing?”
The low numbers mirror the general
public’s confidence in financial institutions, Rowley tells PLANSPONSOR, “which
is quite low. Surveys by Pew Research and Stanford University, among others, show the general
public’s trust in financial institutions hovers in the 10% to 11% range.”
In fact, she says, there seems to be quite a
pall over the defined contribution (DC) industry, where people have more
personal experience with financial institutions, including recordkeepers. In
NARRP’s survey, trust scores for plan providers range from a high of 74% to a
low of 24%, so there’s clearly room for improvement, Rowley notes, especially
if plan sponsors consider the factors that both build and erode trust: accountability,
following through on promises, and understanding needs of the plan sponsor and
employees.
“I can’t think of a factor that’s
more important than accountability and reliability,” Rowley says. “And that’s
where the conversation needs to shift, to how well the provider is doing the job.”
Plan sponsor dissatisfaction with a service provider can be an opportunity for
discussion, the basis for a conversation between plan sponsor and recordkeepers
to see how services to participants, for example, can be improved. “If you’re
having a problem with education or service, the plan sponsor can point it out,”
she says. Change won’t take place immediately, Rowley says, but the more people
talk about it, service providers are going to have to level up their game.
“Building and restoring trust with
both plan sponsors and consumers should be a top priority for financial
institutions,” says Rowley. "Trust a plays unique and critical role in
participant savings behavior—it is a key ingredient for sustained engagement
and for improving retirement savings outcomes.”
The study’s data challenge some of the
more traditional aspects of what drives loyalty and satisfaction, according to Rowley.
“Trust is the bedrock of every brand,” she says. “It is key to participant
engagement, and it is the most important selection and loyalty factor for plan
sponsors.”
The top-rated service providers for
2015 are: Vanguard; Wells Fargo and Charles Schwab (tied for second place); and
Transamerica.
The 2015 study includes
measurements for:
Trust levels with retirement advisers;
Efficacy of service providers’
education programs;
Attitudes about fees and fee
disclosure; and
Individual trust rankings for the
major service providers.
The Plan Sponsor Trust & Confidence Study, fielded
in March 2015, polled 1,226 plan sponsors ranging in size from less than $5 million
to more than $250 million in plan assets (average $61 million). All major industry
groups are represented in the sample. Developed
by NARPP, Boston Research Technologies and Professors from Stanford University,
the study is in its second year. Its goal is to set a standard for evaluating retirement
plan service providers by measuring trust, and the characteristics that build
or erode trust.
For more information about NAARP’s study or to receive a report, email the organization at contact@NARRP.org.