Get more! Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.
2004 Brings Good Returns in Stock Mutual Funds
According to Lipper Inc., a Reuters-owned mutual fund watcher, small-cap value funds led all US diversified mutual funds, posting 20.9% average returns for the year. Small-cap core funds were close behind at 18.49%, according to Reuters. The Russell 2000 rose 17.18% on the year.
In contrast, large-cap growth funds had the lowest returns by style on the year, posting 7.4% gains since January 1. These funds still outperformed – the Dow Jones – which posted a 3.31% gain on the year.
Specialized funds also performed well in 2004, with real estate funds bringing in 32.03% on the year, making them the top performer. Natural resource funds followed closely however, posting average returns of 29.8%. Tech stocks were the year’s worst performers, posting significantly smaller gains of 4.01%.
By geography, international funds performed the best in 2004 on the back of the weaker US dollar, posting average gains of 17.66%. Latin American funds were the biggest returners in 2004 at 38.19%. European funds performed well in 2004, posting 22.07% gains. International gold funds were the only mutual funds to see negative returns on the year, losing 8.81%.
By individual funds, iShares’ MSCI Austria Index Fund outperformed all others in 2004, posting gains of 71.38%. ProFunds’ Wireless Communication UltraSector fund was the second-best performer on the year, posting returns of 67.59%. The Ameritor Investment Fund had the worst gains on the year, losing 35.29%, while ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector lost nearly as much, falling 35.23%.
Looking at the markets in the past five years, small-cap and value funds performed the best. Of large-cap styles, only value funds posted positive returns, with 3.5% average yearlry gains. On the other end of the spectrum, small-cap value rose 16.53% annually. By sector, real estate – buoyed by low interest rates – performed the best over the past five year, rising 21.57% per year on average. Tech performed the worst, losing of 16.36% annually on average.