Market Downturn Highlights Importance of Risk Strategies

August 15, 2011 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Current stock market instability and falling bond yields underscore the risk defined benefit pension plan sponsors are assuming if they don’t have measures in place to minimize that risk, according to Aon Hewitt.

An Aon Hewitt news release noted this time last year (August 11, 2010), the aggregated funded ratio of Canadian defined benefit plans was 87% on an accounting basis. That figure steadily improved and on July 25, 2011, it sat at 97%.   

However, between July 25 and August 12, pension plans truly have been on a rollercoaster. At one point (August 8, 2011), pension plans sat as low as 85%, wiping out the gains – and more – from last year. The volatility seen in accounting position has been huge, with daily swings of more than 2% happening on every business day in August so far except four.  

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

“Given the economic ups and downs of the last few years, some sponsors are opting to minimize risk by implementing either a de-risking strategy or a dynamic investment policy. These plans will find that their funded status is less affected by market volatility,” said Tom Ault, a vice president with Aon Hewitt in Vancouver, in the announcement.  

According to the firm, measures plan sponsors are adopting to reduce risk include making plan design modifications, as well as changing investment policy – increasing diversification out of Canadian equities and intermediate bonds and shifting to global equities, long bonds and alternatives. In addition, organizations may revamp their funding policy and contribution strategy.   

Dynamic investment policies, in particular dynamic de-risking policies, which reduce risk as a plan’s funded ratio improves, are perceived to be a prudent approach to reducing risk and long-term costs, while taking the emotional element out of asset mix decisions. Fundamental to the dynamic investment policy approach is identifying the right balance between two asset categories—return-seeking assets and hedging assets—and managing that balance over time.   

“The current rollercoaster ride may have convinced more plan sponsors of defined benefit plans that it’s time to adopt a more conservative approach to risk,” stated Ault.  

The source for Aon Hewitt’s data is its Pension Risk Tracker. The Pension Risk Tracker updates the aggregated funded ratio of defined benefit pension plans of companies in the S&P/TSX, S&P 500, FTSE and DJ Euro Stoxx 50 on a daily basis. For more detail and analysis of the change in pension funded ratios, visit https://rfmtools.hewitt.com/PensionRiskTracker/.

S&P Issues Report on Mid-Cap Funds in DC Plans

August 15, 2011 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – An S&P report contends that if the goal of employers is to offer retirement plans that are capable of generating adequate retirement funding for participants, then index funds should play a central role in defined contribution lineups.

In its report, “Mid-Caps in DC Lineups: Considerations for Plan Sponsors,” S&P looks at why the vast majority of defined contribution (DC) plans offer at least one index fund, which are mostly concentrated in the large-cap segment of the U.S. stock market.  Passive funds representing other asset classes are offered in far fewer plans, which may be due to popular misconceptions about the efficacy of indexing in markets that are perceived to be less efficient than large-cap equities.  S&P considers the basis for this perception, and why it believes the notion is unfounded for mid-cap equities.   

Key findings from the report include: 

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

  • While companies in the mid-cap segment of the stock market are more mature than small-caps, many may have strong growth potential relative to large-caps. Their unique fundamentals produce a distinct performance profile. 
  • Over the past decade, many investors – and the fund industry – seem to have embraced the notion of including a dedicated allocation to mid-cap equities in their portfolios. The number of actively managed mid-cap mutual fund products increased from 216 at the beginning of 2000 to 461 at the beginning of 2010. 

 

Are defined contribution (DC) plan participants well served by actively managed mid-cap choices, or is this a relatively efficient asset class where indexing works? Analysis shows that more than three quarters of the most widely used mid-cap funds in DC line-ups (drawn from the Pensions & Investment 2011 list of equity funds most frequently used in DC plans) have underperformed the S&P MidCap 400 over the three years ending March 31, 2011.  

Picking active mid-cap managers is risky for plan sponsors, the report said. Over three-, five- and ten-year periods, active funds that failed to beat the benchmark did so by a significantly larger margin than the amount by which outperformers beat the benchmark.  

Despite this evidence suggesting indexing mid-cap exposure is highly effective, less than 20% of DC line-ups in the survey have a passive mid-cap option available for participants.  

Contrary to conventional wisdom, indexing is a highly effective means of gaining exposure to market segments beyond large-caps, S&P notes. Mid-caps are not immune to the “arithmetic of active management.”

Nicole Bliman

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.