Is Your Health Plan SPD ERISA-Friendly?

March 14, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – Does your company have a legitimate summary plan description (SPD) for its health care plan, or simply a certificate of coverage?

Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), employers must provide a plan document and SPD for their health insurance plans. Despite these requirements, employers may simply have a certificate of coverage—written by the insurance carrier—rather than an actual SPD, Richard Schwartz, partner at Seyfarth Shaw’s Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation department, said during the firm’s health care event, “Provide Health Coverage or Pay a Tax Penalty: What Employers Need to Know About Health Care Reform.”

The certificate of coverage from the insurance company satisfies insurance laws, but is not always drafted with ERISA in mind, he said. Beyond ERISA requirements, these documents sometimes fail to contain language that is protective of employers, he added.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

“There’s some exposure out there, if upon audit the DOL asks [an employer] for their SPD,” Schwartz told PLANSPONSOR.

The employer could also run into trouble if an employee asks for an SPD that does not exist. The worst-case scenario would be if a claim goes to litigation and the employer cannot provide an SPD, he warned.  

There are two kinds of risk, Schwartz explained: The risk of a problem arising, and your exposure should it arise. “Sometimes you can’t mitigate the risk of something happening,” he said, but you can be prepared if it does.

When preparing or reviewing SPDs, Seyfarth Shaw said plan sponsors should: 

  •  Review the insurance certificates and make sure their understanding of the program is the same as the insurer’s or third-party administrator’s (TPA’s) understanding of it;
  •  Identify any substantive or legal provisions that are missing or inadequate;
  •  Identify any desirable or protective language that is missing or inadequate; and,
  •  Ask the insurer or TPA if they will correct any inadequate provisions or add any “missing” provisions.  

Plan sponsors that do not have actual SPD documents for their health care plans can contact their ERISA attorneys. “This is an extremely important subject,” Schwartz concluded. 

DC Participants Transfer Less in February

March 14, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - After rising sharply in January, defined contribution (DC) plan participants’ daily transfer volumes resumed levels closer to normal in February.

According to the Aon Hewitt 401(k) Index, net transfer activity was moderate, totaling $431 million or 0.31% of total participant balances. This amount is far less than January’s total of $930 million (see “DC Participants Embrace Equity in January”).  

Net daily transfers favored fixed income funds for 63% of trading days in February, which is similar to the trend of 2012. Transfers into diversified equities (equity excluding company stock) asset classes totaled $104 million of total flows or 0.06% of total assets.  

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Total net outflows during the month were heavily concentrated among two asset classes: company stock funds, losing $193 million (45%), and bond funds, which lost $171 million (40%) due to flows. Additionally, large U.S. equities funds lost $45 million (10%) and emerging market funds lost $22 million (5%).

February ended with net inflows for most asset classes. The largest inflows went to GIC/stable value funds, which gained $151 million (35%). Premixed funds received $75 million (17%) and international funds took in $70 million (16%) of monthly inflows, while money markets gained $68 million (16%).  

Employee discretionary contributions, another measure of participant sentiment, increased their equity allocations from the January average of 62.2% to 63.4% of new contributions were invested in equities during February.  

By the end of February, participants’ overall equity allocation remained flat at 61.1%, up slightly from 61.0% at the end of January.

«