Report Shows Decline in Employer Health Coverage

March 1, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – A U.S. Census Bureau’s report, “Employment-Based Health Insurance: 2010,” shows the rate of employer-based health plan coverage dropped from 64.4% in 1997 to 56.5% in 2010.

According to the report, among employed individuals, the percentage covered by employer plans dropped from 76.0% in 1997 to 70.2% in 2010. Those not in the work force—people without jobs not currently looking for work—saw a change of 45.4% to 38.6%. For unemployed individuals—people without jobs actively seeking employment —the rate fell from 33.5% to 30.8%.

Hubert Janicki, an economist with the Census Bureau’s Health and Disability Statistics Branch, clarified how individuals who are not employed could be covered by employment-based health insurance, saying: “Unemployed and individuals not in the labor force with employment-based coverage were generally covered by a previous employer’s plan or someone else’s, such as a spouse’s or a parent’s employer.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The study found that family income was a strong predictor of working for an employer that offers any health insurance benefits: Individuals with family income less than 138% of the federal poverty level were the least likely (43.3%) to work for an employer that offered health insurance benefits, and those with family income 401% and above of the federal poverty level were the most likely (80.9%) to work for an employer that offered health benefits. The federal poverty level for a family of four was $22,113 in 2010.

The report cited several reasons for nonparticipation in an employer’s health insurance plan. Half (50.4%) of nonparticipating workers whose employer offered health insurance benefits declined coverage by choice. While two-thirds of these (66.4%) declined coverage because they were receiving health care insurance from another source, more than one-quarter (27.4%) opted out due to cost. Roughly one-third of nonparticipating employees—37.1% in 1997 and 32.2% in 2010—claimed they were “ineligible” for an employer-sponsored plan, typically because they had not completed their probationary period or they were temporary or part-time workers.

Other highlights of the report include:

  • In 2010, 71.1% of employed individuals ages 15 and older worked for an employer that offered health insurance benefits to any of its employees.
  • Less than half (42.9%) of individuals who did not complete high school worked for an employer that offered health insurance to any of its employees, compared with more than three-quarters (78.9%) of individuals with a college degree.
  • 75.7% of workers ages 45 to 64 worked for an employer that offered health insurance benefits, compared with 60.0% of workers 19 to 25.
  • Among married couples with only one member employed in a firm that offered health insurance benefits, 68.7% of married couples provided coverage for the spouse.
  • While 37.6% of firms with fewer than 25 employees offered more than one health insurance plan, 65.6% of firms with 1,000 or more employees offered more than one plan.

The report uses data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.

Sara Kelly

Retirement Plans a Major Vehicle for Owning Mutual Funds

March 1, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) In 2012, 72% of households owning mutual funds owned them through employer-sponsored retirement plans.

A research report from the Investment Company Institute (ICI) indicates nearly half of mutual fund-owning households held funds through multiple channels in 2012. Seventeen percent of mutual fund-owning households held mutual funds both inside employer-sponsored retirement plans and through investment professionals; 5% owned mutual funds both inside employer-sponsored retirement plans and through the direct market channel; and 10% held mutual funds through investment professionals and the direct market channel. Thirteen percent owned funds through all three channels.  

Older mutual fund-owning households tend to own mutual funds outside of employer-sponsored retirement plans. In 2012, 73% of mutual fund-owning households age 50 or older held mutual funds outside of employer-sponsored retirement plans, with 82% of these owning mutual funds through investment professionals. In contrast, 57% of younger mutual fund-owning households held their funds outside of employer-sponsored retirement plans. In addition, 27% of older mutual fund-owning households held funds only in employer-sponsored retirement plans, compared with 43% of younger mutual fund-owning households.  

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The research, which examines ownership of mutual funds through investment professionals, found more than half of mutual fund-owning households owned funds purchased through investment professionals. In 2012, 53% of households owning mutual funds held funds purchased through the investment professional channel, which includes registered investment advisers (RIAs), full-service brokers, independent financial planners, bank and savings institution representatives, insurance agents and accountants. Thirty percent owned funds purchased through the direct market channel, which includes fund companies or discount brokers.  

Mutual fund-owning households with ongoing advisory relationships tended to be headed by slightly older individuals and were more likely to have greater household financial assets than households without advisory relationships. The median head of household age for mutual fund-owning households with ongoing advisory relationships was 52, compared with a median age of 49 among households without ongoing advisory relationships.   

Median household financial assets for mutual fund-owning households with advisory relationships were nearly double that of their peers without advisory relationships. Mutual fund-owning households with female decisionmakers were more likely to have ongoing advisory relationships than households with male decisionmakers.  

The research report, “Ownership of Mutual Funds Through Investment Professionals, 2012” is at http://www.ici.org/pdf/per19-02.pdf.

«