A Review of How the Fiduciary Rule Could Affect Retirement Plan Sponsors
The fiduciary rule has shaken up the advisory space, but plan sponsors also need to know what’s in the rule and make plans for how it could affect them.
Issuance of the final fiduciary rule, or conflict-of-interest rule, from the Department of Labor (DOL) has shaken up the advisory space, but plan sponsors are paying attention too, waiting to see how it will affect services from their providers and advisers.
Cerulli Associates anticipates advisers will increasingly choose technology platforms to deliver advice, and insurance product pricing may become more like mutual funds. Fourteen percent of retirement plan providers surveyed by SPARK Institute believe they will become an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) fiduciary for the first time under the new regulations.
In addition, nearly two-thirds, 64%, of the nation’s top retirement plan recordkeepers and providers believe that the new DOL fiduciary rule will deter rollovers from retirement plans into individual retirement accounts (IRAs), thus helping them to retain assets, the LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute found in a survey. And one-third of financial advisers who counsel defined contribution (DC) plans already plan to make changes to mutual funds used in their clients’ DC plans in 2017, according to a study from Ignites Retirement Research.
The fiduciary rule will affect all plan types, including defined benefit (DB) plans, 403(b)s and health savings accounts (HSAs).
Many see the fiduciary rule as a positive for plan sponsors. Experts say plan sponsors will see an expansion of fiduciary services, and sponsors and participants will be offered more information to help them make informed decisions. But, plan sponsors will likely face changes and new liabilities of their own.
Plan sponsors should definitely know what’s in the rule, and take action to prepare for changes in provider and adviser service delivery. Actions 403(b) plan sponsors are taking include re-evaluating adviser choices, reviewing investment lineups and reviewing plan governance structure.
However, plan sponsors should move forward with preparation, even though some think the DOL Secretary pick by president-elect Donald Trump could change the course of the rule.
A new report from BrightScope
and the Investment Company Institute (ICI) finds the great majority of employers
that sponsor 401(k) plans—more than three-quarters—contribute to their plans to
promote employee financial wellness.
The in-depth study, “The BrightScope/ICI Defined
Contribution Plan Profile: A Close Look at 401(k) Plans, 2014,” shows employers
use a range of formulas when they provide matching contributions. It also
reveals that plan sponsors offer a wide variety of investment choices and that mutual fund fees in 401(k) plans have trended down.
Data from the study was drawn from the Department of Labor (DOL)
on a wide range of private-sector 401(k) plans, with additional detailed
investment data drawn from the BrightScope Defined Contribution Plan Database,
which covers nearly 30,000 large 401(k) plans.
“The study underscores how the 401(k) plan’s flexible
structure permits employers to configure their own plan designs to encourage
employee participation and meet the needs of their workforces,” observes Sarah
Holden, ICI’s senior director of retirement and investor research and a
researcher on the study. “As the 401(k) market evolves, plan sponsors revisit
and refine their plan designs and remain committed to promoting retirement saving,
offering a wide range of investment choices, and often making contributions to
the plans.”
Looking across the universe of 401(k) plans, the analysis
finds that employers contributed about one-third, or $115 billion, of total
401(k) plan dollars invested in 2014. In nearly all (95%) of the large plans
with 5,000 participants or more, the employer contributed in 2014, while more than
three-quarters of small 401(k) plans with fewer than 100 participants featured
employer contributions.
“Focusing on a sample of large 401(k) plans reveals that in
25% of 401(k) plans in the BrightScope database, employers contributed to the
plan without regard to how much the employee contributed,” the study shows. “Simple
matching formulas are the most common type of employer contribution—found in
45% of 401(k) plans in the BrightScope database.”
Under simple matching formulas, an employer matches an employee
contribution up to a fixed percentage of the employee’s salary (for example,
50 cents on the dollar on employee contributions up to 6% of pay). Another 14% of
401(k) plans in the BrightScope database had a tiered formula, with employers
matching different levels of employee contributions at different rates, and 2%
of employers matched up to a maximum dollar amount.
Among the most positive findings, researchers observe that nearly
all (97%) of the sample of more than 50,000 large 401(k) plans with 100
participants or more and at least $1 million in plan assets included at least
one of the three activities considered crucial to plan success by many
observers—automatic enrollment, employer contributions, and carefully
controlled participant loans. Twenty-one percent of the 401(k) plans in the
sample reported evidence of all three activities.
“Larger plans were more likely to have all three activities
in their plans,” researchers suggest. “The most prevalent combination of plan
activities was employer contributions in plans that also had participant loans
outstanding—observed in 47% of 401(k) plans in the sample.”
NEXT: Fund fees
trending down
Based on the data from the BrightScope database, the study
found that mutual fund fees in 401(k) plans trended downward between 2009 and
2014. The study also found that fund expenses are typically lower in larger
plans.
“For instance, the average asset-weighted expense ratio for
domestic equity mutual funds was 82 basis points for 401(k) plans with $1
million to $10 million in plan assets, compared with 39 basis points for 401(k)
plans holding more than $1 billion in plan assets,” researchers observe.
Brooks Herman, head of data and research at BrightScope, a
unit of Strategic Insight, further observes that fees in 401(k) plans continue
to trend downward over time, due in large part to increased transparency in the
form of public disclosure that have allowed plan participants and plan sponsors
to better judge the impact of fees on 401(k) savings.
As in years past, other key findings show mutual funds were the most common 401(k)
investment vehicle, holding 46% of 401(k) plan assets in the sample in 2014. Collective
investment trusts (CITs) held 26% of plan assets; guaranteed investment
contracts (GICs) held 9%; separate accounts held 4%; and the remaining 16% was
invested in individual stocks, bonds, brokerage, and other investments. In the qualified
default investment alternative (QDIA) slot, target-date funds (TDFs) are still supreme; 76%
of 401(k) plans in the sample offered target-date funds, compared with 32% in
2006. During the same period, the share of participants who were offered target-date funds rose from 42% to 77%.
The research further shows the offering of index funds rose
from 79% to 89% from 2006 to 2014, and the percentage of plan assets invested
in index funds rose from 17% to 29% during that period.