Active Management Linked to Strong Endowment Returns

April 24, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – A recent paper from the Commonfund Institute finds a positive connection between active investment management and high endowment returns in equity asset classes.

The paper, “Does Active Management Benefit Endowment Returns? An Analysis of the NACUBO-Commonfund Study of Endowments (NCSE) Data,” examines the active management versus passive management debate and concludes that endowments with more active asset management see higher returns net of fees from U.S. equity allocations.

The analysis also finds that endowments with a designated chief investment officer or outsourced chief investment officer (OCIO) are better able to earn incremental positive returns from active management than those without. 

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

“Larger endowments are better able to earn incremental positive returns from active management than the smallest endowments, but the effect appears to diminish as endowments increase in size,” say the authors of the paper, including David Belmont, Commonfund’s chief risk officer, and Irakli Odisharia, Commonfund’s market risk director.

“Active management is broad and portfolio managers may use a variety of factors and strategies to construct their portfolios,” explain Belmont and Odisharia, based in Wilton, Connecticut. These include quantitative measures, sector investments that attempt to anticipate long-term macroeconomic trends, and purchasing the stock of companies temporarily out of favor. Other strategies include risk arbitrage, short selling and option writing. The effectiveness of an actively managed investment portfolio depends on many elements, the team writes, which include the skill of the manager and the research staff, as well as market conditions.

Another element to consider is risk, says the paper. “Active managers have risk characteristics that match well with endowment risk appetite. These risks are typically slightly higher volatility, somewhat lower liquidity, and higher portfolio concentration than passive managers,” say Belmont and Odisharia.

The paper also notes that the performance benefits of active management are more evident over the long term. “Our results suggest that during individual years, active management in U.S. equity may or may not add value but that over longer periods of time, active management does add value and outperforms passive index investing. Outperformance in active investing is a long-term effect and takes time to materialize,” say Belmont and Odisharia.

Belmont and Odisharia observe that it requires skill and ongoing diligence to identify truly active managers and ensure the endowment isn’t paying excessive fees to a “closet indexer,” or a fund manager that advertises as active but closely correlates to an index. They say it is easy to make a mistake in differentiating a truly active manager from closet indexers and that performance analysis of managers’ returns is essential if one is to capture the benefits of active management. 

The paper recommends that in order to capitalize on the benefits of active management, smaller endowments need to have access to the services of a skilled evaluator in order to discern true active managers from closet indexers. For smaller endowments, the overhead costs of an in-house chief investment officer and support staff can outweigh the benefit. However, benefits of such services can be partially or fully obtained via the use of OCIO and consulting services.

The paper can be downloaded here.

BMO Touts Automatic Features in First of Education Series

April 24, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – BMO Retirement Services has released the first in a series of reports intended to educate retirement plan sponsors.

The paper, “BMO Defined Contribution IQ: Automatic Features,” is the first in a nine-part, bi-monthly education series titled “Defined Contribution IQ (DC IQ),” which was developed for retirement plan sponsors and their consultants. The reports will examine issues related to retirement plans, including plan design, participant utilization and operational efficiency.

The inaugural report in the series contends automatic features help increase employee participation in defined contribution (DC) plans and can significantly improve participant outcomes. The paper examines the use of automatic features within a DC plan and contends plan sponsors have not traditionally received guidance on how to implement these features effectively.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The paper identifies questions that plan sponsors need to address such as:

  • When should employees be automatically enrolled?;
  • Which default investment option should be used?; and
  • What annual automatic escalation rate should be adopted?

“For increased transparency and ease of understanding, we believe access to a retirement plan should be treated like any other employment benefit,” says Todd Perala, author of the series of papers and director of Strategic Initiatives, Retirement and Trust Services for BMO Global Asset Management, based in Chicago. “We recommend that during the annual benefits enrollment, plan sponsors simply inform employees that unless they opt out, they will be automatically enrolled in the 401(k) plan at the beginning of the new benefits year.”

The paper says a deferral rate as high as 6% for automatic enrollees does not increase the number of participants opting out. For this reason, BMO suggests automatically enrolling participants at the maximum matching level. In the paper, Perala recommends automatically escalating deferral rates by 1% to 2% annually, ideally timed with yearly salary increases to limit reductions in take-home pay.

In addition, Perala suggests a carefully chosen target-date fund may be the most suitable qualified default investment alternative. While traditionally, principal-safe investments were considered an ideal choice, he notes, these investments rarely generate the growth needed to provide for a financially secure retirement.

“While a target-date fund may have the potential for loss of principal, it also has the ability to generate the earnings over time that will be needed to support a more lengthy retirement period,” says Perala. “Among the universe of target-date funds, most of which use a fund-of-funds approach, we recommend plan sponsors select a fund family whose managers actively monitor the underlying investments. This ensures that no individual stock comes to represent an overly significant percentage of the fund’s total holdings.”

The paper can be downloaded here. More information about the plan sponsor education series can be found here.

BMO Retirement Services is a part of BMO Global Asset Management and a provider of retirement services such as defined contribution recordkeeping and defined contribution investment-only services.

«