Allianz Targeted by Raytheon in Fiduciary Breach Lawsuit

The complaint suggests Allianz abandoned a hedging strategy that was the supposed cornerstone of an investment fund utilized by the Raytheon pension plan, resulting in unexpected losses. 

Plaintiffs have filed a new Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Allianz Global Investors.

Distinguishing the case from many of the numerous ERISA suits filed in the past several years, the plaintiffs in the suit are not retirement plan participants but instead are members of the Raytheon Technologies Corporation Pension Administration and Investment Committee. In their complaint, the plaintiffs suggest Allianz mismanaged a fund called the AllianzGI Structured Alpha U.S. Equity 500 LLC, allegedly leading to hundreds of millions of dollars in losses on behalf of the Raytheon pension plan.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“Allianz courted retirement plans to invest in the fund, promising them that structural risk protections were the cornerstone of the Structured Alpha strategy,” the complaint states. “While the fund was designed to generate returns through an options trading strategy, Allianz promised that hedges would be in place ‘at all times’ to cap the downside risk of that strategy. Allianz told investors that these hedges would limit investment losses to a ‘defined maximum loss,’ afford ‘reinsurance’ against a market crash, and eliminate the risk of a margin call.”

According to the complaint, Allianz also promised that it would never forecast the direction of the market or market volatility, that Structured Alpha’s investment strategy was “non-directional,” and that it would “perform whether equity markets are up or down, smooth or volatile.” The plaintiffs say these claimed risk protections were critical to the decision by the plan’s fiduciaries to invest assets in Allianz’s Structured Alpha investment strategy.

“Yet when equity markets declined, volatility spiked and the fund’s option positions were exposed to a heightened risk of loss in February and March 2020, Allianz’s promised protections were absent,” the complaint alleges. “Unbeknownst to the plan fiduciary or anyone at Raytheon, and in violation of Allianz’s stated investment strategy and the fiduciary duties it owed under ERISA, Allianz had abandoned the hedging strategy that was the supposed cornerstone of Structured Alpha, leaving the portfolio almost entirely unhedged against a spike in market volatility.”

The complaint goes on to allege that Allianz placed a directional bet that volatility would remain relatively low even as the pandemic struck in the U.S. The plaintiffs call this “the equivalent of a ticking time bomb if its forecast (one it had promised ‘never’ to make) proved false.”

“As Allianz has since admitted, it constructed the fund’s portfolio to offer no downside protection against the market decline and volatility spike that occurred in February and March 2020,” the complaint alleges. “Contrary to its promise to investors that it would always purchase hedges as ‘reinsurance’ for the options it sold, Allianz had purchased no hedges for an entire segment of the portfolio. Meanwhile, the so-called hedges that Allianz did purchase were not the hedges Allianz said it would buy.”

Allianz Global Investors shared the following statement regarding the lawsuit: “As we set out at the time, the Structured Alpha portfolio sustained losses during the severe market rout in late February and March. While the losses were disappointing, the allegations made by Raytheon Technologies Corporation Pension Administration and Investment Committee are–like other plaintiffs’–legally and factually flawed, and AllianzGI will defend itself vigorously against them.”

Allianz has not yet responded to a request for comment about the complaint, but it has responded to similar allegations leveled in related lawsuits filed in recent months.

How HSAs Work

Speakers at the virtual PLANSPONSOR 2021 HSA Conference discussed features of health savings accounts (HSAs) and rules regarding them.

Speaking during the opening session of PLANSPONSOR’s 2021 Virtual HSA Conference, Roy Ramthun, founder and president of HSA Consulting Services LLC, said the best way to understand a health savings account (HSA) is to think of it as a bank account that is typically paired with a high-deductible health plan (HDHP), or an HSA-qualified health plan.

He said HSAs are paired with such plans to help participants in HDHPs meet the expenses that come with the plans and to provide them with tax savings during the process.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“Anyone covered by a high-deductible health plan can participate in an HSA,” he said. “The only people who may be covered by that type of plan who cannot participate are tax dependents; anyone enrolled in Medicare, Medicaid or Tricare; or anyone participating in health FSAs [flexible spending accounts] or HRAs [health reimbursement arrangements]; or anyone covered by other insurance with no or low deductibles.” In 2021, the minimum deductible is $1,400 for an individual and $2,800 for a family, Ramthun said.

Other than their triple tax advantages—contributions are tax-free, profits on investments are tax-free and withdrawals used for qualified medical expenses are tax-free—there are two other main benefits of HSAs, Ramthun said.

“Lower premiums help fund HSAs; in general, a high-deductible health plan tends to bring your premiums down, and that money is then available to help you fund your HSA account,” he said.  “Also, account holders get free preventative health care below the deductible.”

Ramthun added that HSA-compatible insurance and coverage extend to a wide variety of medical needs, including preventive care, dental coverage, vision coverage, cancer and other specific illness insurance, hospital indemnity insurance, accident insurance, medical liability insurance and discount cards.

Zack Hoffmann-Richards, an associate with Groom Law Group, said he favors HSAs, particularly because of their triple tax advantages, lack of income minimums or limits, and additional catch-up contributions permitted at age 55.

“They also decrease employer and employee income and payroll taxes,” Hoffmann-Richards said. “Employer contributions are exempt from federal income and employment taxes, and, unlike FSAs and HRAs, employers are not required to determine if employees use their HSA contributions for qualified medical expenses because the account is the property of the account holder, who is responsible for its management. If the account holder distributes money from the account for non-medical expenses under the age of 65, that money will be subject to income tax and a 20% penalty. Only if the account holder is disabled or 65 and older will those fees not apply.”

The IRS also permits HSA holders to make a one-time transfer from a traditional individual retirement account (IRA) or a Roth IRA to an HSA, Hoffmann-Richards continued. “However, both accounts must be owned by the same individual, and they must be eligible to contribute to an HSA for that year.”

Hoffmann-Richards said IRS Publication 502 contains all the details about what medical expenses an HSA can cover. Recent changes the IRS made now allow for HSAs to cover COVID-19 testing and treatment, telehealth services and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs and medicines, even if they are not prescribed, as well as menstrual care products and insurance premiums, he said.

He said the accounts can cover the account holder, their spouse and any qualifying children or relatives whom the account holder claims as dependents on their taxes.

HSAs are user-friendly because they typically are tied to a debit card or online bill payment system, said Jamie Greenleaf, lead adviser and principal at Cafaro Greenleaf. “The money rolls over year after year, and, if invested, can grow substantially.”

The IRS also permits employers to automatically enroll their workers in an HSA as long as it includes an opt-out provision, she said.

“We think automatically enrolling workers in HSAs is a best practice because it helps participants drive their success in building dollars for medical equity throughout their lifetime,” Greenleaf said.

Finally, Hoffmann-Richards noted that HSAs are generally not subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). “The DOL [Department of Labor] issued two Field Assistance Bulletins granting sponsors safe harbor from ERISA if the establishment of the HSA is completely voluntary,” he said.

«

Thank you so much for your interest in our content. Please register to access this complimentary archived content. By registering, you will receive our newsletter which can be opted out of at any time.

 

 

Already Registered? Click here to confirm.