After some 50 years of operations, the American Society of
Pension Professionals and Actuaries (ASPPA) has taken a new name, the American
Retirement Association (ARA), to reflect an expanding mission.
The ARA and its affiliated organizations represent more than 20,000
members across nearly all retirement industry professions—including actuaries,
consultants and administrators, insurance professionals, financial advisers,
accountants, attorneys and human resource (HR) managers.
The ARA’s roots extend back to the 1966 founding of the American
Society of Pension Actuaries. Today its members
work with retirement plans of all types, from traditional defined benefit (DB) pension
plans to 401(k)s, 403(b)s and 457 plans.
Brian Graff, executive director and CEO of the ARA, says membership has seen strong growth in recent years. “This
new name and structure allows us to better acknowledge and represent the
distinct perspectives of an expanding array of retirement plan professionals in
a dynamic and complex legislative and regulatory environment,” he says.
Based in the Washington, D.C., area, the ARA is a nonprofit organization with the goals of
educating retirement benefit professionals and “creating a framework of policy
that gives every working American the ability to have a comfortable retirement.”
The organization is composed of four distinct
retirement industry associations. These are the American Society of Pension
Professionals and Actuaries (ASPPA); the ASPPA College of Pension Actuaries
(ACOPA); the National Association of Plan Advisors (NAPA); and the National
Tax-deferred Savings Association (NTSA).
As part of the launch of the American Retirement
Association, a new logo and brand identity have also been developed for each of
its member associations.
Automatic
enrollment is being touted as a must-use feature for defined contribution (DC) retirement
plan sponsors to increase plan participation and help more employees get on
track for retirement, but many plan sponsors cannot use this
feature, and some may not believe in forcing employees into their plans.
Specifically,
most 403(b) plans that are not governed by the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act (ERISA) cannot use automatic enrollment. John Kevin, vice
president for the K-12 market at VALIC in Houston, says most K-12 public school
systems’ hands are tied by state anti-garnishment laws which say amounts may
not be deducted from employee paychecks without written permission. Ellie
Lowder, of TSA Consulting and Training Services in Tucson, Arizona, which
provides consulting for PlanMember Securities Corp., the National Tax-Deferred Savings
Association (NTSA) and other clients in the industry, points out that for 501(c)(3)
tax-exempt entities that want to maintain the non-ERISA status of their
403(b)s, ERISA says they must have limited involvement with the plan, and
auto-enrollment would run afoul of the law.
These
plan sponsors want to boost employee participation and engagement with their
plans to ensure retirement readiness of employees and help employees retire
when they want. Lowder adds that helping employees retire when they want is a
budget-saver, as salaries and certain benefit costs are lower for new employees
than for long-term employees.
Kevin
tells PLANSPONSOR another reason it is important, especially for public
schools, to boost employee participation in their DC plans—403(b)s and 457s—is
the increasing uncertainty of public pension benefits. Many public pensions
have funding issues, and many have made changes, such as lengthening service
requirements and increasing employee contribution requirements. “Boosting DC
plan participation adds diversity to retirement savings options for employees
as well as employers,” he says. “If we increase participation in DC plans, it will
hedge against more uncertainty in the future for pensions, and for Social
Security.”
Lowder says the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has provided another reason for increased
interest in boosting participation in non-ERISA 403(b) plans. She tells PLANSPONSOR that in late 2013, she
began to receive reports that the IRS started a new focus in audits,
specifically in the K-12 public education market. The IRS had begun to check on
effective opportunity for employees to enroll and make changes, as required by
403(b) universal availability rules. “They told me when I followed up with them
that they were selecting for audit plans with participation rates as low as 15%
to 20%,” she says.
So,
what is a non-ERISA 403(b) plan sponsor to do to boost participation and
engagement without auto-enrollment as a tool?
Lowder
says, during a webcast following her conversation with the IRS, an agent told attendees
that to comply with effective opportunity, 403(b) plan sponsors must employ
year–round strategies; it is not enough to provide an annual notice of the
opportunity to participate in the plan. According to the agent, efforts must include
year-round education about the plan and financial issues. Lowder says this
should include newsletters, workshops and face-to-face meetings with benefits
staff and advisers to encourage enrollment.
Kevin
adds that employers should not forget tried and true methods DC plans have been
using to boost participation—various communications with participants and one-on-one
counseling with advisers. “Communication tactics are already well-developed,”
he says, suggesting plan sponsors use a multi-tiered approach, using do-it-yourself
calculators, websites, call centers and meetings, to reach a broader set of the
employee population. “Ultimately, it’s just a matter of getting participants
more engaged and helping them recognize the value of these plans in the face of
future uncertainty.”
According
to Lowder, plan vendors or providers will need to bring to the attention of
employers the need to increase 403(b) plan participation and how to do so
because employers do not have expertise in these plans. For example, she notes
that K-12 plan sponsors are school business officials; they’re not experts in
supplemental retirement plans.
Most
K-12 plans, and many other 403(b)s have multiple vendors or providers. Lowder
says vendors are approaching plan sponsors about providing more financial
education opportunities for employees, but the plan sponsors are questioning
how other vendors will react if the plan sponsor allows one to provide
financial literacy workshops. She says this can be done, without slighting vendors,
if the presenting vendor brings to every workshop a list of all vendors and their
contact information and is not allowed to tout itself during workshops. “I’ve seen
this, and participation increased for all providers in the plan following the
workshops,” she notes.
Lowder adds that the
message to employees is important, and education should include workshops about
the basics—such as what is an annuity and what is a mutual fund—as well as an offer
to help employees calculate the gap between what they will need in retirement
and what other benefits and Social Security will provide them. “The call to
action is to identify this gap,” she says.