Baby Boomers Stuck in the Middle

August 5, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – Unprepared Baby Boomers face a bleak decision as they enter their mid-60s—work beyond the traditional retirement age or risk running out of money down the line.

Orlando Ashford, president of the Talent business at Mercer, says it’s becoming increasingly common to see retirees attempt to rejoin the work force due to the prospect of depleting previously accumulated assets. In a recent analysis from Mercer on the “four generations at work,” Ashford suggests the United States’ economy-wide shift in career and retirement savings arrangements is having the greatest impact on the generation of workers born between 1946 and 1964, widely known as the Baby Boomers.

Put simply, many Boomers are stuck between the fading defined benefit-dominated retirement system and the still-developing defined contribution system. Entering the later stages of their working lives, Boomers have spent long portions of their careers under the defined benefit (DB) paradigm—and while many Boomers expect to receive some lifetime pension benefits from a current or former employer, many are not saving enough in supplementary defined contribution (DC) accounts to adequately supplement future income streams.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Mercer’s research suggests Baby Boomers are also stuck between the need to save for their own retirement and other pressing daily financial concerns—especially the need to support both children and elderly parents. Other primary challenges facing Baby Boomers include lingering recessionary impacts, lengthening lifespans, and increasing health care expenses, according to Mercer.

“Boomers are moving from the age of dependence and support, whether it was government support or corporate support, into an era of individual accountability,” Ashford says. The combined force of these pressures makes taking charge of retirement savings quite a challenge for Boomers, he adds (see “Personal Accountability in a DC World”).

“The implications for employers are quite fascinating,” Ashford says. “How are you going to help retirees re-enter a changing work force? How are you going to manage people in their second or third career, while engaging people who are in their first career at the same time?”

The Mercer analysis suggests these pressures are already reshaping retirement for the modern individual. Retirement is no longer necessarily a one-time event for many workers, as it once was for earlier generations. More workers, especially Boomers, will continue to work part-time or attempt to re-enter the work force after a short break, Mercer says, making retirement a phase, not a single date.

Shams Talib, a senior partner and leader of Mercer’s retirement business in North America, says Baby Boomers are not oblivious to the challenges they face. Many are feeling financially vulnerable and insecure about retirement, he tells PLANSPONSOR, and their worries are playing out against the background of mounting funding challenges for Social Security.

Most Boomers are planning to rely at least in part on supplemental retirement income from the federal government, Talib explains. But whereas younger generations have time to prepare for any cutbacks in promised Social Security benefits, late-career workers would find it more difficult to replace anticipated income without delaying retirement.

Indeed, Tablib predicts the aging of the Baby Boomer population will bring a lot of long-standing predictions about the potential shortcomings on the DC retirement system to a renewed public focus. He points to the 2014 Retirement Confidence Survey conducted by the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI), which shows nearly a quarter of workers age 55 and over have saved less than $1,000 for retirement. A third of this same age group thinks an individual can retire comfortably on less than $250,000 in savings. (According to Fidelity Benefits Consulting research, a 65-year-old couple retiring this year will need an average of $220,000 in today’s dollars to cover medical expenses alone throughout retirement.)

“This issue is starting to have some interesting consequences on the broader work force,” Talib says. “If senior employees can’t afford to retire, it creates increasing frustration in the work force, resulting in a lack of focus and lost productivity among younger workers who feel their advancement opportunities are limited.”

What’s more, those born in the later part of the Baby Boomer generation are not assured to get Social Security payments, Mercer says. The sheer size of the Baby Boomer generation threatens the viability of the federal safety net program. Mercer cites the U.S. Census Bureau to suggest there will be 84 million people in the 65-and-older age category by 2050—meaning nearly double the number of people could be drawing benefits from Social Security than do so today (see “It Is Difficult to Factor Social Security into Retirement Planning”).

“This generation is still expecting to get Social Security,” Talib says. “The nuance is the eligibility will change. So they may have to wait longer before they can get it, if at all.”

Even in the face of these obstacles, plan sponsors and advisers have the opportunity to maximize employee productivity and give employers a recruiting edge through superior benefits offerings, Mercer says. For example, taking a proactive stance to help Baby Boomers make informed caregiving decisions regarding an elderly parent could have a positive residual impact on an entire work force, the analysis suggests.

Mercer cites a recent report from the National Alliance for Caregiving to show employees with elder care responsibilities are more likely to report missed days of work. The same study suggests there’s an 8% differential in increased health care costs between caregiving and non-caregiving employees. When extrapolated to the overall business sector, this increased health care bill would cost U.S. employers an estimated $13.4 billion per year, Mercer says.

Employees providing elder care—most of them are Baby Boomers, Mercer says—were significantly more likely to report depression, diabetes, hypertension, or pulmonary disease. In addition, these employees were more likely to report negative influences of personal life on their work.

Offering some sort of elder care support or education could help mitigate some of these effects, Talib says. Other challenges may require other tools. For instance, if the plan participants cite the challenges of funding a child’s college costs, the plan officials could look into establishing a supplementary 529 college savings plan to bring more formality to Boomers’ efforts to save for their kids’ college expenses.

“One of the main goals of the sponsor and adviser has to be building a sense of personal accountability among the Baby Boomer employees, and indeed among all generations,” Talib adds. “The challenge of plan sponsors and advisers is a little different for older generations. They need to build an immediate focus on retirement income adequacy and preparedness for health care in retirement.”

(b)lines Ask the Experts – Managing Form 5500 Filing for Multiple Plans

August 5, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR (b)lines) – “I work for a large nonprofit hospital, and through a series of acquisitions we have ended up administrating a variety of 401(a), 401(k) and 403(b) plans (more than 10), some of which are a) frozen, b) have very few participants, or c) both.

“It has created an overwhelming amount of Form 5500 filings (readily apparent to me this time of year as I am making certain that extensions have been filed for each plan as I write this), in addition to other reporting and disclosure requirements, as well as other administrative work. Is there anything I can do to reduce the burden?”  

Michael A. Webb, vice president, Cammack Retirement Group, answers:

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Excellent question, and, given the current climate of mergers and acquisitions in health care, a question to which I am certain a number of our readers can relate! There are a variety of solutions to these issues, dependent upon factors such as plan size and type, plan features, and whether the plan is frozen or active, and how long the plan has been frozen or active.

The best first step is to develop a retirement plan organizational chart of each member of your current controlled group in a separate box. In each box, indicate whether or not the entity sponsors  a retirement plan; if yes, list the plan (or plans) by type (e.g. 401(a), 401(k), 403(b), 457(b)/(f), etc.), name of plan recordkeeper (or recordkeepers), plan contribution formula, whether or not the plan is subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) (if applicable), whether the plan is active or frozen and, if the latter, when the plan was frozen to new contributions. This may sound basic, but the Experts have encountered  situations in which an administrative staff of the plan sponsor discovered plans (457(b) and 457(f) plans in particular) about which they were previously unaware.

The next step is to confirm that EXECUTED copies of all plan documentation for each plan exists, along with a copy of the most recent filed Form 5500 for the plan (if subject to ERISA). Again, this may sound simplistic, but completed documents that a plan sponsor neglected to sign are not uncommon.

Next, make all of this information available to benefits counsel well-versed in retirement plans of nonprofits, and pose the following question: “How can I simplify the administrative burden posed by sponsoring such a large number of plans?”

Counsel will then likely propose several solutions in response to this question, including, but not limited to, the following:

  • Merging and/or terminating plans. Note that only plans of the same type (e.g. 403(b)) can be merged;
  • Confirming that plans with less than 100 participants are being filed as small plans for Form 5500 purposes (which eliminates such administrative burdens as a plan audit), and what steps can be taken, if any, to reduce the number of participants of plans that are on the threshold of being a small plan; and
  • Confirming that 403(b) plans are taking full advantage of certain grandfathering provisions that allow for certain contracts not to be considered to be part of the plan for purposes of the Code or certain sections of ERISA (the latter which may be able to reduce the number of plan participants for purposes of the previously mentioned solution above).

 

Once appropriate action has been taken in this regard, a plan sponsor may also wish to look at the number of recordkeepers it utilizes, and perhaps issue a request for proposals (RFP) to consolidate the number of recordkeepers to as few as one, since, in addition to reducing administrative burdens, the purchasing power of the retirement plan assets of the entity can be improved. However, such a process generally does not take place until after any plan merger/termination issues have been addressed, since plan sponsors that sponsor fewer retirement plans are generally more attractive to potential recordkeepers than those that sponsor a greater number of plans.

Good luck!

 

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.

«