Begin Your Path to Wellness Compliance Now

September 23, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Employers increasingly realize that healthier employees give them an edge over the competition; that’s why top companies are developing creative ways to engage workers in wellness initiatives and improving personal health.

However, it’s not easy to determine what is and isn’t legal when it comes to wellness.

On June 3, 2013, the U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services and Labor and Treasury released final rules on Incentives for Nondiscriminatory Wellness Programs in Group Health Plans. These amend the 2006 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) non-discrimination and wellness provisions, which prohibit group health plans from discriminating against an individual because of his or her health. 

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Starting January 1, 2014, these newly clarified rules take effect for employers offering incentives for health-contingent wellness programs through a group health plan. Given the short time frame until the rules take effect, now is the time to evaluate wellness initiatives to ensure compliance.

Employers should design wellness strategies to promote health and prevent disease, not as a way to discriminate against individuals with health risks. Application of these five wellness requirements depends on whether the plan is “participatory” (offered to all employees regardless of health status) or “health-contingent” (giving a reward to those who meet a health-related standard, whether outcome-based or activity-only).

If your wellness initiative is considered health-contingent, it must follow these five requirements:

1.     All individuals must have the opportunity to qualify for the reward at least once per year.

·         SAME as the original guidance.

2.     The total of all health-contingent wellness rewards, whether for one or multiple health factors and activities, is limited to 30% of the total cost of employee-only health coverage. Programs designed to prevent or reduce tobacco use may increase the total tobacco-related reward to 50% of employee-only health coverage.

·         CHANGE - The total amount of the reward increased from 20%. Yet, the average employer incentive ranges from 3% to 11%.

3.     The program must have a reasonable chance of improving health or preventing disease without discriminating based on a health factor. A reasonably designed program must not be overly burdensome, discriminate based on a heath factor or be suspect in method.

·         SAME with clarification.

4.     The program must provide reasonable alternative standards to those who don’t meet the initial standard. You must provide the reasonable alternative for all health-contingent wellness program rewards, or the standard can be waived for an entire class or on an individual basis.

·         SAME with a number of clarifications which specify if an individual completes a reasonable alternative mid-plan year, the same full-plan year reward must be awarded retroactively to the beginning of the year or prorated through the rest of the year.

5.     You must communicate the ability to qualify for the reward through a reasonable alternative standard, or the possibility of a waiver of the standard in all plan materials.

·         SAME with new sample language.

In compliance matters, seek the advice of your attorney. Talk with your consultant or wellness partner to ensure your wellness initiative is reasonably designed to promote health and prevent disease, and to determine whether your current wellness rewards approach requires changes. Engaging employees requires more than incentives. A healthy workplace culture starts with commitment from senior leaders and direct supervisors, and is reinforced by passionate front line employees. Consider how a healthy workforce may contribute to your organization’s performance, and work with your consultant or internal partners to develop a plan to achieve it.

Laura Hoag is a Senior Consultant with Findley Davies’ Health and Group Benefits Practice, specializing in integrating wellness programs into health care strategy and organizational culture.   

 

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.

How Public Pensions Invested Assets

September 23, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – The total holdings and investments of major public pension systems reached their high level during second quarter 2013, passing their 2007 peak for a second consecutive quarter.

According to the Quarterly Survey of Public Pensions compiled by the U.S. Census Bureau for the 100 largest public-employee retirement systems in the country, cash and security holdings totaled $2,943.5 billion in the second quarter of 2013, reaching the highest level since the survey began collecting data in 1968. Cash and security holdings had a quarter-to-quarter increase of 0.4%, from $2,931.8 billion last quarter, and a year-to-year increase of 8.4%, from $2,715.4 billion in the second quarter of 2012. Earnings on investments totaled $38.3 billion in the second quarter of 2013.

Corporate stock holdings quarter-to-quarter increased 0.6%, from $1,006.9 billion to $1,013.2 billion in the second quarter of 2013. Corporate stocks year-to-year increased 7.4%, from $943.1 billion in the second quarter of 2012. Corporate stocks comprised about one-third (34.4%) of the total cash and security holdings of major public pension systems for the current quarter.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The survey found corporate bond holdings quarter-to-quarter decreased 1.5%, from $330.8 billion to $325.7 billion in the second quarter of 2013. Corporate bonds year-to-year decreased 9%, from $357.9 billion in the second quarter of 2012. Corporate bonds comprised less than one-eighth (11.1%) of the total cash and security holdings of major public pension systems for the current quarter.

International securities holdings quarter-to-quarter decreased 0.7%, from $596.7 billion to $592.6 billion in the second quarter of 2013. International securities year-to-year increased 16.8%, from $507.4 billion in the second quarter of 2012. International securities comprised about one-fifth (20.1%) of the total cash and security holdings of major public pension systems for the current quarter.

Federal government securities holdings quarter-to-quarter decreased 0.1%, from $267.3 billion to $267.1 billion in the second quarter of 2013, according to the survey. Federal government securities year-to-year increased 6.9%, from $249.8 billion in the second quarter of 2012. Federal government securities comprised less than one-tenth (9.1%) of the total cash and security holdings of major public pension systems for the current quarter.

The survey also found government contributions had a quarter-to-quarter increase of 11.8%, from $20.4 billion to $22.8 billion in the second quarter of 2013, and a year-to-year increase of 2.3%, from $22.3 billion in the second quarter of 2012. Employee contributions had a quarter-to-quarter increase of 21.2%, from $9.4 billion to $11.4 billion in the second quarter of 2013, and a year-to-year increase of 11.2%, from $10.3 billion in the second quarter of 2012.

Government contributions to employee contributions had a 2 to 1 ratio this quarter—government contributions comprised 66.6% and employee contributions comprised 33.4% of total contributions. Total payments totaled $62.2 billion, reaching the highest level yet. Total payments quarter-to-quarter increased 3.6%, from $60.0 billion last quarter, and a year-to-year increase of 16.8%, from $53.2 billion in the second quarter of 2012.

The survey examined a panel of the 100 largest state and local government pension systems, as determined by their total cash and security holdings reported in the 2007 Census of Governments. These systems comprised 89.4% of financial activity among such entities, based on the 2007 Census of Governments.

More information about public pensions can be found here.

«