Biden Administration Releases Final Rules on Mental Health Parity

The updates are meant to ensure that ERISA health plans provide the same amount of coverage for mental health and substance abuse care as for physical health care benefits.

The administration of President Joe Biden announced Monday a series of final rules to expand access and lower costs for mental health and substance use care.

The rules, issued by the departments of Health and Human Services; Labor; and Treasury, are aimed to strengthen the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, enacted in 2008, which requires health insurance plans that cover mental health to do so at the same level as physical health.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

In 2020, Congress made changes to the MHPAEA that require health plans to conduct meaningful comparative analyses to make sure they are not making it harder for individuals to access mental health and substance use benefits than to access medical benefits. The MHPAEA was also amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021.

The final rules now make it clear that employers offering health plans need to evaluate their provider networks, how much they pay out-of-network providers and how often they require—and deny—prior authorizations, according to the administration’s announcement.

The outcomes of these evaluations may reveal where plans need to make changes to comply with the rule, such as “adding more mental health and substance use professionals to their network or reducing red tape for providers to deliver care,” the White House stated.

Under the rules, health plans also cannot use non-qualified treatment limitations that use more restrictive prior authorization, other medical management techniques or narrower networks to make it harder for people to access mental health and substance use disorder benefits. In addition, health plans are required to use similar factors in setting out-of-network payment rates for mental health and substance use disorder providers as they would for medical providers.

Lastly, the final rules close an existing loophole from when the MHPAEA was first enacted, as it originally did not require non-federal government health plans, like those offered to state and local government employees, to comply with its requirements. Now more than 200 additional health plans for public employees are required to comply with the MHPAEA, expanding protections to 120,000 consumers, according to the announcement.

“Mental health care is health care,” Biden said in a statement. “But for far too many Americans, critical care and treatments are out of reach. Today, my administration is taking action to address our nation’s mental health crisis by ensuring mental health coverage will be covered at the same level as other health care for Americans. There is no reason that breaking your arm should be treated differently than having a mental health condition. The steps my administration is taking today will dramatically expand access to mental health care in America.”

Immediate reaction to the final rules was mixed. Melissa Bartlett, senior vice president of health policy at the ERISA Industry Committee, said in a statement that although the final rule incorporates some feedback that was offered by stakeholders, the potential impact of these changes “remains a great concern.”

“While more review is needed, the rule goes far beyond Congress’s clear intent when it enacted the MHPAEA and the CAA and, at a minimum, adds complexity to the landscape for employers who choose to offer behavioral health benefits for their workers,” Bartlett stated. “As ERIC evaluates this rule and assesses the implications for its member companies, we will consider all possibilities to prevent further harm to employers offering behavioral health benefits, and the employees and families who count on them–up to and including litigation.”

ERIC in May wrote a letter to the White House calling the proposed changes to MHPAEA “burdensome” to employer plans and said the changes would cause plans to face “a morass of incomprehensible regulatory standards for compliance.”

ERIC argued that the result of enacting the rule would be increased costs for employers sponsoring health benefits and decreased access to high-quality providers and mental health care services done remotely. Even worse, the group warned that it could result in employers scaling back coverage or dropping mental health and substance use disorder coverage completely.

The departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury intend to continue to provide guidance and compliance assistance materials in the coming months to assist plans and issuers in complying with the MHPAEA, as well as inform participants, beneficiaries and enrollees regarding their rights under the rule.

The final rules generally apply to group health plans and group health insurance coverage on the first day of the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2025, according to the Employee Benefits Security Administration. However, plans and companies will be given until January 1, 2026, to comply with certain new standards.

Until the applicability date, plans and issuers are required to comply with the existing requirements, including the CAA amendments to the MHPAEA.

More information on the final rule can be found on EBSA’s website.

The Case for State Auto-IRAs: ‘Simplest Avenue’ to Facilitate Retirement Savings

For the smallest of employers, offering a state auto-IRA program provides minimal administrative and fiduciary burdens.

Angela Antonelli

From a small business owner’s perspective, deciding whether to offer a retirement plan comes down to two essential questions: “How much time is this going to take?” and “How much is this going to cost me?” says Angela Antonelli, the executive director of the Center for Retirement Initiatives at Georgetown University.

As small business owners are largely focused on keeping their doors open, many do not have the time or funds to figure out what plans and service providers will suit their employees’ needs. Antonelli says the goal of state-run plans for private sector workers is to help the smallest employers offer a program that is simple, low-cost and easy to execute.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

“That being said, the reality is: For some small employers, not offering plan has just been inertia more than anything else,” Antonelli says. For some employers, “it’s not an administrative burden or cost issue; they just haven’t taken the time to make it happen.”

Increased Adoption

The Bureau of Labor Statistics found that 67% of U.S. private sector workers had access to a defined contribution retirement plan, as of March 2023, and 49% chose to participate in the plan, according to an April 2024 report.

Because in states with automatic individual retirement account programs, private sector employers who do not offer a plan are required to facilitate the state program, many employers have started offering those programs to their employees purely because of the mandate.

New 401(k) plan formation has also increased in states that have adopted auto-IRA policies, according to a study recently conducted by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

However, Antonelli says there is still a segment of small businesses for whom the state program is all they can manage.

“[For] populations that might be part time, working different schedules … [or] are not highly paid employees, the reality is, an auto-IRA account is going to be perfectly suitable for those employees,” Antonelli says. “But for other employers, where maybe it’s just been a factor of inertia, they’re now getting pushed to do what they’re honestly capable of doing.”

Developing Track Record

State auto-IRA programs continue to make significant progress; since inception, they have accumulated $1.64 billion in assets and registered about 220,000 employers.

In particular, CalSavers, California’s retirement savings program, one of the first programs created, continues to break new ground: California State Treasurer Fiona Ma announced on August 29 that CalSavers reached $1 billion in assets under management.

CalSavers was created by legislation passed in 2016 requiring employers in California that do not sponsor a retirement plan to participate in CalSavers—an auto-IRA with no employer fees or fiduciary liability. The program is professionally managed by private sector financial firms with oversight from a public board chaired by the state treasurer.

From the pilot in 2019 through July 2024, CalSavers has seen 89.5% of private sector employers in California respond to the call to register for the savings program and more than 519,000 participants have contributed to accounts. There are 50,000 facilitating employers in the program.

Meanwhile, proponents of pooled employer plans, created by the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019, have argued that the multiple employer plans are particularly advantageous for small plans, as they provide advantages of scale and typically low-cost investment lineups.

Antonelli agrees that a lot of efficiencies come with PEPs, such as lighter administrative and fiduciary burdens for plan sponsors, but for some of the smallest employers, she says PEPs still bring their technical challenges.

“Keep in mind, the PEP is an ERISA plan,” Antonelli says. “Setting up an ERISA plan [or] a standalone 401(k) is a very different calculus [than a state auto-IRA]. It’s more time-consuming, it’s more administration. There are more costs associated with doing all of that.”

Antonelli notes that there are now more options for employers to set up retirement plans than ever before. The new challenge is for those in the industry to explain these options to employers and for employers to select the right plan type for their business and their participants.

“After we’ve come out of SECURE 2.0, and the industry has been given starter 401(k)s [and] the tax incentives for [small plans], now [the responsibility] shifts to the industry,” Antonelli says. “You’ve been given the tools you’ve asked for. What are you going to do with those, and how are you going to reach out to employers and help them sort through all these options?”

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.