(b)lines Ask the Experts – Retirement Plan Contributions from Disability Plan

July 15, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR (b)lines) – “I recently started working at a University and noticed that our disability carrier has been making contributions to our retirement plan on behalf of employees who are currently unable to work due to disability.

“Apparently we have a rider in our group long-term disability (LTD) plan that provides for such a benefit, so that such employees do not miss out on their retirement plan contributions due to disability. I have never seen these contributions before; does the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) permit such a benefit? And how are such contributions treated for tax purposes?”  

Michael A. Webb, vice president, Cammack Retirement Group, answers:

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Your question is quite timely since the IRS recently released final regulations in this regard (see summary here). Such insurance payments for disabled employees are indeed permissible, and are not taxable to participants at the time the amounts are remitted to the retirement plan, provided that the following conditions are met:

  • Premiums for the disability insurance contract are paid directly from the plan;
  • The plan receives the benefit payments as required by the disability insurance contract;
  • Benefit payments under the contract are paid because of an employee’s inability to continue employment with the employer because of disability; and
  • The benefit payments to a participant’s account aren’t more than a reasonable expectation of what the participant would’ve received as an annual contribution during the disability period, reduced by any other contributions.

In the Experts experience, however, the premiums for such insurance are often not paid directly by the plan, but by the employee, the employer or a combination of both. If the disability insurance premiums aren’t paid by the plan, the insurance benefits paid to the plan aren’t a return on a plan investment. Instead, if contributed to the plan, these payments are contributions to the plan governed by qualified plan contribution rules (generally, IRC Section 415(c), which limits contributions to a defined contribution plan, particularly 415(c)(3)(C) which applies to contributions while permanently and totally disabled).

Furthermore, even if not taxable upon contribution to the plan, this does NOT mean that the benefit is completely tax-free. Upon distribution of the participant’s account balance, these contributions would be taxable to the participant is a manner similar to any other plan benefit (with a waiver of the 10% premature distribution penalty in the event of total disability).

Though such contributions are permissible, in actual plan operation, they are often problematic from a compliance perspective. Such contributions are often misclassified in the retirement plan, or not remitted properly, due to the fact that the source of the contributions, the plan’s long-term disability carrier, is unfamiliar with retirement plans. Administration is often a manual process, which can also lead to errors. It is for this reason that some disability carriers provide such a benefit outside of the retirement plan, in a separate trust administered by the insurer. If a plan sponsor chooses to provide such a benefit within the retirement plan, it should work with benefits counsel well-versed in such matters to ensure that no operational failures occur.

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.
Tags
Reported by
Reprints
To place your order, please e-mail Reprints.

401(k) Investors See Lower Mutual Fund Expenses in 2013

July 14, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – Participants of 401(k) plans saw lower expense ratios when investing in long-term mutual funds during 2013, according to a report from the Investment Company Institute (ICI).

“The Economics of Providing 401(k) Plans: Services, Fees and Expenses, 2013” shows that at year-end 2013, nearly 38% of 401(k) plan assets were invested in equity mutual funds. In 2013, 401(k) plan participants who invested in equity mutual funds paid an average expense ratio of 0.58%, down from 0.63% in 2012.

Similarly, expense ratios that 401(k) plan participants paid for investing in hybrid mutual funds fell from 0.60% in 2012 to 0.58% in 2013. The average expense ratio 401(k) plan participants incurred for investing in bond mutual funds dropped from 0.50% in 2012 to 0.48% in 2013.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

One reason for this decrease is that participants in 401(k) plans tend to pay lower fees than fund investors overall, according to the report. The 0.58% paid by 401(k) investors in equity funds is lower than the expenses paid by all equity fund investors (0.74%) and less than half the simple average expense ratio on equity funds offered for sale in the United States (1.37%). The experience of hybrid and bond fund investors is similar.

“It is clear from our study that 401(k) participants investing in mutual funds tend to invest in lower-cost funds,” says Sean Collins, ICI’s senior director of industry and financial analysis, who is based in Washington, D.C. “This tendency on the part of investors sets up a competitive dynamic within the fund industry, as funds strive to provide ever better services at even more competitive prices. This dynamic is amplified to the benefit of retirement savers through the design of the 401(k) system, in which plan sponsors as fiduciaries select mutual funds as investment options for their plan.”

The report finds that this decrease in expense ratios is part of a pattern that has been going on for more than a decade. In 2000, 401(k) plan participants incurred expenses of 0.77% of the 401(k) assets they held in equity funds. The 0.58% incurred in 2013 is a 25% decline. The expenses 401(k) plan participants incurred investing in hybrid and bond funds also fell from 2000 to 2013, by 19% and 21%, respectively.

Several other factors contribute to the relatively low expense ratios of mutual funds offered through 401(k) plans, according to the report. They include:

  • Competition among mutual funds and other investment products to offer shareholders service and performance;
  • Plan sponsor decisions to cover a portion of 401(k) plan costs, which allow them to select lower-cost funds or share classes;
  • Economies of scale, which large investors such as 401(k) plans can achieve;
  • Cost- and performance-conscious decisionmaking by plan sponsors and plan participants; and
  • The limited role of professional financial advisers in these plans.

More information about 401(k) plans can be found at ICI’s 401(k) Resource Center. A copy of the report can be downloaded here.

«