(b)lines Ask the Experts – Taxation for Beneficiaries Younger than 59½

January 8, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR (b)lines) – “A participant in our retirement plan recently died and she was not married, so her daughter was the beneficiary. The daughter is younger than age 59½.

“Will she pay ordinary income taxes if she receives a lump-sum distribution? And what about the 10% premature distribution penalty that would normally apply for distributions to individuals who have not yet attained age 59½.”  

Michael A. Webb, Vice President, Retirement Plan Services, Cammack LaRhette Consulting, answers:  

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Good question! Some beneficiaries mistakenly believe that 403(b) distributions (or other qualified plan distributions, such as 401(k) distributions) are not taxable to the beneficiary since such assets, such as life insurance proceeds, generally pass directly to named beneficiaries. However, this is an incorrect assumption; 403(b) plan assets are subject to ordinary federal income taxes upon distribution to a beneficiary.   

If you think about it, this taxation makes sense, since the assets accumulate in the account without taxation and were always designed to be “tax-deferred”, not “tax-free”. Note, however, that Roth 403(b)s are not subject to any federal taxes upon receiving a qualified distribution, and a distribution to a beneficiary would be the type of distribution  that would not subject the beneficiary to federal income tax. After-tax contributions to a 403(b), would also not be taxed (since they have already been taxed, by definition), though such contributions are uncommon in 403(b) plans. Note, however, that earnings on non-Roth after-tax contributions would be subject to taxation.  

However, 403(b) distributions to a beneficiary are NOT subject to the 10% premature distribution penalty, even if the beneficiary is younger than 59½, since distributions to a beneficiary or estate are an exception to the penalty (note: the IRS provides a handy list of exceptions to the penalty as well as an explanation of the penalty itself, at IRS Tax Topic 558 http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc558.html).  

 Of course, the beneficiary need not take a lump-sum distribution of her mother’s 403(b) balance. She can maintain the assets in the 403(b) plan as an inherited 403(b) if the terms of the plan permit it, and take distributions in the future, again subject to ordinary federal income taxes, but no 10% premature distribution penalty. Like any other 403(b) plan assets that are eligible for distribution, she can also roll over the 403(b) into an IRA account; however, it must be an inherited IRA in her name, as beneficiary of the deceased participant. If the beneficiary wishes to preserve tax deferral of 403(b) assets, she should consult with a tax advisor well versed in such matters for discussion of the various options, which are beyond the scope of this column.  

You may have noticed that the Experts did not mention state or estate taxes; this was intentional, as the taxation of death benefit distributions varies by state and estate taxes are beyond the scope of this article; beneficiaries should contact their tax advisers to address any state or estate taxation issues. 

 

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.
Tags
Reported by
Reprints
To place your order, please e-mail Reprints.

Pension Funded Status Slow to Rebound

January 7, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - In December, plans in the Milliman 100 Pension Funding Index experienced a $54 billion increase in funded status.

The increase is due to a $46 billion decrease in the pension benefit obligation (PBO) and an $8 billion increase in assets.

The $54 billion improvement in December follows a $33 billion improvement in November, but it would still take many more months of improvement to make up for a year of ballooning pension deficit, Milliman said. At year end, the deficit of $412 billion is $74 billion higher than last year.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“It was a good year on the asset side, with these pensions experiencing a $90 billion gain,” said John Ehrhardt, co-author of the Milliman Pension Funding Study. “But it was a rough year on the liability side, with interest rates driving a $164 billion increase in the pension benefit obligation. People may be getting tired of hearing me saying it but interest rates have been the story for the last four years and that’s not going to change in 2013.”

In December, the discount rate used to calculate pension liabilities increased from 4.05% to 4.18%, decreasing the PBO from $1.794 trillion to $1.748 trillion at the end of the month. The overall asset value for these 100 pensions increased from $1.328 trillion to $1.336 trillion.

Looking forward, if these 100 pensions were to achieve their expected 7.8% median asset return and if the current discount rate of 4.18% were to be maintained throughout 2013 and 2014, these pensions would improve the pension funded ratio from 76.4% to 81.0% by the end of 2013 and to 85.7% by the end of 2014.

 

These year-end figures are only tentative, and will be revisited when the 2013 Milliman Pension Funding Study is completed in March. De-risking activities made by some of these companies will probably lower asset and liability figures, which we expect to have a slightly negative impact on the overall funded status of these plans.

The complete study is available here.  

 

«