(b)lines Ask the Experts – What Is Revenue Sharing?

June 19, 2012 (PLANSPONSOR (b)lines) – At the live Ask the Experts session at the recent 2012 PLANSPONSOR National Conference, an attendee asked, “What is revenue sharing?” 

The experts answered:  

Simply put, revenue sharing is a practice where an investment company shares a portion of the revenue it receives for fund expenses from plan participants with a third party that performs a function the investment company would otherwise have to provide. A common example of this is a sub-transfer agency fee, or sub-ta, where the fund company compensates a recordkeeper for providing participant-level recordkeeping services which the fund company itself would ordinarily be required to provide.    

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Revenue sharing was a hot topic at the 2012 PlanSponsor National Conference due to increased efforts by the DOL to make certain that all forms of revenue sharing (there are many types) are disclosed via the 5500 and directly to plan sponsor via the new 408(b)(2) service provider fee disclosure requirement. The prudent plan fiduciary will review the disclosures to make sure such revenue sharing is reasonable relative to the service provided. If not, the fiduciary should negotiate a  reasonable reimbursement, with any excess revenue sharing credited to the plan in the form of an expense reimbursement account, which can then be credited back to participants or be used to defray legitimate plan expenses.  Until recently, expense reimbursement accounts were a rarity in 403(b) plans due to lack of plan sponsor knowledge of expenses. However such accounts have become increasingly commonplace, especially in larger 403(b) plans.    

The experts also noted that, though expense reimbursement accounts can be established in church and governmental plans that are not subject to ERISA, private tax-exempts with elective-deferral arrangements meant to comply with the ERISA exemption under Reg. §2510.3-2(f) should consult counsel well versed in 403(b) plans before attempting to address any revenue sharing or other expense issues, since such involvement presumable would violate the ERISA exemption.  

 

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice. 

DOL Secures 401(k) Funds from Government Contractor

June 18, 2012 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – The former CEO of a defunct Southern California electrical contractor has agreed to restore more than a half-million dollars in 401(k) funds to employees.

Mark Dell Donne, who served as a fiduciary of Aliso Viejo-based Journey Electrical Technologies Inc.’s retirement plan, agreed to restore $570,983 in 401(k) funds, to settle a Department of Labor (DOL) lawsuit. He has already restored $98,748 to the plan’s accounts.

The DOL’s lawsuit resulted from an investigation by its Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), which determined that between January 2004 and March 2008, some of the employees’ wages for work performed on public works projects were deposited in the company’s general funds instead of the workers’ 401(k) plan accounts as required under the government contracts. Employee elective 401(k) contributions and participant loan payments also were not forwarded for deposit into plan accounts, in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The plan had 105 participants and a balance of more than $1.9 million as of Dec. 31, 2010, the latest information available.

“We are pleased to be able to secure these retirement funds for the company’s former employees,” said Phyllis C.  Borzi, assistant secretary of labor for employee benefits security. “Employees working on government construction or service contracts are often unaware of the benefits they are entitled to under prevailing wage laws, including fringe benefit payments to their employee benefit plans. Plan fiduciaries have a legal responsibility to ensure that this money is properly deposited in employee accounts.”

«