(b)lines Ask the Experts – Why the Fiduciary Rule Applies to IRAs but Not Non-ERISA 403(b)s

“I know that the applicability date of the Department of Labor’s (DOL)'s  final fiduciary rule is on hold, but presuming it becomes effective, why does it apply to IRAs?

“Aren’t IRAs exempt from the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), and thus any of ERISA’s fiduciary provisions? And what about the many 403(b) plans that are also not subject to ERISA? If the fiduciary does not apply to those plans, why would it apply to IRAs?” 

David Levine and David Powell, with Groom Law Group, and Michael A. Webb, vice president, Retirement Plan Services, Cammack Retirement Group, answer: 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Excellent questions! Let’s address non-ERISA 403(b) plans first, as such plans are specifically exempted from the final fiduciary rule by the following language:

“Code section 403(b) contracts and custodial accounts purchased or provided under a program that is either a ‘governmental plan’ under section 3(32) of ERISA or a non-electing ‘church plan’ under section 3(33) of ERISA are not subject to the final rule. Similarly, the Department in 1979 issued a ‘safe harbor’ regulation at 29 CFR 2510.3–2(f) which states that a program for the purchase of annuity contracts or custodial accounts in accordance with section 403(b) of the Code and funded solely through salary reduction agreements or agreements to forego an increase in salary are not ‘established or maintained’ by an employer under section 3(2) of the Act, and, therefore, are not employee pension benefit plans that are subject to Title I, provided that certain factors are present. Those non-Title I 403(b) plans would also be outside the scope of the final rule.” 

Thus, any 403(b) plan that is not subject to ERISA is exempt from the final fiduciary rule. However, there are many 403(b) plans of private, tax-exempt employers that are subject to ERISA, and would thus be subject to the final fiduciary rule.

As for IRAs, you are correct that they are generally exempt from ERISA provisions. However, IRAs are subject to the Tax Code; and Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code address prohibited transactions between IRAs an “disqualified persons” including fiduciaries. The section then goes on to define to define a fiduciary to include any person designated as a fiduciary under ERISA. It is this basis that the DOL is using to affirm that its definition of what constitutes a fiduciary applies to Section 4975 of the Code as well. In addition, the DOL has specific authority over Code Section 4975 through Reorganization Plan No. 4, an executive order issued in 1978. Of course, enforcement of these prohibited transaction rules under the Tax Code would be the responsibility of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and not the DOL. It should be noted that 403(b) plans are specifically exempt from Code Section 4975, which partially explains the differing treatment of IRAs and non-ERISA 403(b) plans under the final fiduciary rule.

And, of course, as you stated in your question, the applicability date of the final fiduciary rule has been delayed, so none of its provisions apply as yet.

 

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.  

Do YOU have a question for the Experts? If so, we would love to hear from you! Simply forward your question to Rebecca.Moore@strategic-i.com with Subject: Ask the Experts, and the Experts will do their best to answer your question in a future Ask the Experts column.
Tags
Reported by
Reprints
To place your order, please e-mail Reprints.

Retirement Plan Recordkeepers Provide 'Low Advice'

More than half of households with $100,000 to $500,000 in investable assets rely on “low advice” providers, a new Cerulli Associates analysis finds. 

“Financial firms’ myopic emphasis on retirement planning minimizes consideration of other important priorities,” a new report from Cerulli Associates warns. “This is a disservice to the middle market, which includes more than 70% of investor households under age 40.”

According to the May 2017 issue of The Cerulli Edge – U.S. Edition,  “successfully addressing the goal-focused advice demands of the middle-market segment requires scalable technology tools that are interesting, interactive, impartial, impactful, and incremental.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

More than 23 million U.S. households possess investable assets between $100,000 and $500,000, according to Cerulli. “These middle-market households average approximately $250,000 each in investable assets, accounting for more than $5.4 trillion collectively,” Cerulli reports. “While households in this tier have made admirable progress in beginning to accumulate assets, they often fall below the client wealth levels that traditional financial advisers target.”

“Ironically, while these households are not frequently targeted, as a group they are likely to receive some of the greatest incremental benefits by engaging with an adviser who can help guide them toward increased financial security,” Cerulli says. “Improvements in cash flow management, satisfying insurance needs, and increased attention to their portfolios have the potential to markedly increase the long-term financial success of these households, but recognizing and addressing these issues rarely rises to the top of their to-do list unless nudged by a comprehensive advice provider.”

For plan sponsors, it is important to note that investors widely do not approach these topics with the appropriate level of urgency until it’s too late—in the wake of an untimely market correction, layoff, or even death.

“When we look at the sources of financial advice that these middle-market households rely upon, we find that 56% turn to what can fairly be deemed as “low advice” providers—bank deposit arrangements, direct investing platforms, and retirement plan providers,” Cerulli says. “Though many firms operating in these segments try and offer libraries of written or video content that purports to help their clients better understand a variety of topics, they consistently aim to deliver general guidance rather than personalized advice.”

NEXT: From general to personal advice 

Sooner or later, Cerulli warns, investors in this segment will ask representatives of their providers for some sort of personalized advice.

“Representatives are generally instructed to direct the inquiring party to the previously mentioned resources or suggest the client seek a more specialized advice source,” Cerulli says. “This model is deemed necessary to limit providers’ potential exposure to litigation if any proffered advice is found to be sub-optimal, but these scenarios invariably weaken clients’ perception of their advice providers and leave the clients’ advice needs unsatisfied.”

Cerulli’s report continues: “As individuals enter the workforce, the one piece of financial guidance they are almost assured of hearing is the need to start saving for retirement as early as possible. While this is usually not bad advice, it is also not likely the type of action that would have the most immediate or long-term benefit to a young investor.”

Instead of “recognizing the importance of the journey, and helping clients maximize the utility of their assets along the way,” Cerulli says financial advice firms have traditionally focused their efforts on helping investors reach “the number.”

“However, this retirement focus generally minimizes consideration of a variety of other financial priorities. Unless middle-market investors actively seek a comprehensive financial planner, they are unlikely to receive even guidance on topics beyond retirement accumulation.”

Information on obtaining Cerulli Associates research is available here

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.