BLS Data Shows Changing Landscape in Retirement Plan Coverage

March 6, 2006 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) shows there has been an overall drop in retirement plan coverage, a participation shift from defined benefit to defined contribution plans, and changes in retirement plan features in the last decade.

According to a BLS report, in 2005, 60% of workers had access to some type of retirement plan. Of those offered a retirement plan, 85% participated in a defined benefit plan, defined contribution plan, or both. However, data shows a shift in the type of plans employees are participating in.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

In 1992-93, 32% of private industry workers participated in a defined benefit plan, while 35% participated in a defined contribution plan. In 2005, the number participating in a defined contribution plan had increased to 42%, while the number participating in defined benefit plans had decreased to 21%. BLS attributes the shift to c hanges in employment (i.e. more part-time workers, less union workers), federal regulation of defined benefit plan funding, the rise of 401(k) plans, and a growing shift in responsibility toward the employee for retirement savings.

While savings and thrift plans with a 401(k) feature are the most common type of defined contribution plan, BLS found other types of DC plan are still being used. In 2003, 70% of those participating in a DC plan were covered by a thrift and savings plan, 21% participated in a profit sharing plan, and 11% participated in a money purchase pension plan.

To help boost participation in DC plans, plan provisions have changed. Employer match contributions are increasingly used to encourage participation. BLS data showed the most common employer match formula to be 50% of employee deferrals up to 6% of salary. In addition, automatic enrollment is the newest tool employers are using to boost participation. In 2003, 5% of those participating in a thrift and savings plan were in a plan with an automatic enrollment feature.

Employers are also giving participants more investment choices for their DC contributions. In 2002, a quarter of employees permitted to choose their own investments in DC plans had more than 10 investment choices. In 1993, only 6% of employees had seven or more investment choices.

Aside from the shift to DC, BLS noted an increase in the use of non-traditional plans such as cash balance or pension equity plans. BLS data indicates that in 1991 only 3% of those who participated in a DB plan were covered by a cash balance plan. By contrast, in 2000, 23% were covered by a cash balance plan. In 2003, two percent of DB participants were covered by a pension equity plan, the newest type of hybrid plan. A pension equity plan is similar to a cash balance plan, but differs in that it uses participants’ final salary in the calculation of benefits instead of using salary for each year of work.

BLS gathered its data from its National Compensation Survey (NCS). The most current incidence data is from the 2005 NCS. The most current plan provision data is from the 2003 NCS.

The BLS report is here .

PwC, Raytheon Shareholders Settle

May 27, 2004 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP has agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by Raytheon Co. shareholders who claimed the auditing firm signed off on misleading financial statements.

Shareholders of the Waltham, Massachusetts-based defense contractor alleged PricewaterhouseCoopers issued clean audit opinions of Raytheon’s finances, despite numerous red flags that indicated accounting problems in 1998. The suit, filed by New York State Comptroller Alan Hevesi, sole Trustee of the New York State Common Retirement Fund, said the auditing firm stood to gain more than $70 million worth of fees for non-audit services, according to a news release issued by Hevesi’s office.

In admitting no wrongdoing in the case, PricewaterhouseCoopers agreed to pay $50 million to settle the action.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

“This settlement sends a strong message to auditors and other gatekeepers that they will be held to a high level of accountability and integrity in matters that impact the investing public,” Hevesi said.   “Investors depend on these third parties to guard them from corporate corruption and fraud. Auditors must be independent and diligent in overseeing public companies in order to protect shareholders whose savings and retirements are vulnerable to corporate wrongdoing.”

Earlier this month, Raytheonagreed to pay a total of $410 million in cash and warrants to settle all claims against it and its former top executives in the same action.   Hevesi said if the settlements, which are both currently pending before the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, are approved; the $460 million settlementwould be the 6th largest settlement in securities class action history.

«